Modern Political Science, Of The "Ginned-Up Old Party"

mascale

Gold Member
Feb 22, 2009
6,836
800
130
The U. S. President is famously now on record defending Secretary Clinton from the email issue, equally famously, "Ginned Up" by the Republicans. As opposed to arousing the people's indignation, it seems, the concept "Rev Up" or getting "Keyed up" does not apply to the current Republican control of the federal legislatures. "Gin Ups" are rabble rousing incidents created out of nothing.

What does gin up mean? gin up Definition. Meaning of gin up. OnlineSlangDictionary.com

Historically, Abraham Lincoln, in fact, did not come to office with the intent of creating a Constitutional Amendment, abolishing slavery. The South in fact created a Israeli Level, infamous atrocity--the concept of a pre-emptive strike, with no basis in a genuine threat. Fort Sumter was attacked. Jews themselves are not a genuine threat, internationally, for example. Their reliance on the non-existent deity of human subjugation, in their Moses Atrocity--nowhere so-called--is also an atrocity of European Civilization, generally. Catholics and Protestants are all on board. By the time of Civil War, in fact, a slave was worth upwards of $2500 per person, and pretty much self-reliant. A mule was maybe worth $25.00, and hungry. An acre of land was worth a dollar, more or less. The South was under attack, but even though it was not.

The Republicans are also a rich person's party--Trump and Fiorina, most notably on the recent stages. Carly Fiorina ginned up a crisis over some kid, stillborn. Cemeteries know that stillborn babies happen.

The GOP tends to be supportive of Western Civilization generally. The basis atrocity revealed in Matthew 25:14-30--most recently the foreclosure crisis and the Great Recession--has remedy in Matthew 20:1-16, not applied until mostly the union cost-of-living adjustments of the 1940's. A $0.01 per hour raise was paid for every 0.3 rise of the Consumer Price Index: Equally to everyone covered in the CBA. That then got replaced with the fixed percentage COLA, most famously made permanent in Social Security by Richard Nixon, President, of the famous peculiar hiring tendencies. He himself wanted to not be thought a crook. So he hired some, and the rest is history(?).

Now there is no clear concept of how the Republicans intend to run the federal legislatures. Benghazi is no longer regarded a genuine investigative committee. Millions have health plans under ObamaCare. Possibly not even Trump even knows what the legislation is all about. The emails are being expunged and scrutinized by the Clinton lawyers and the FBI.

Essentially, now the entire GOP would be regarded a "Ginned Up" brand.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Lands of Many Nations: Know this Concept. . .deeply and personally! Maybe now able to join USC football team!)
 
Instead of a Constitutional amendment, which is constitutional, he decided to shred our COTUS and shit on the citizens.
Gotta love tyranny :)
 
The U. S. President is famously now on record defending Secretary Clinton from the email issue, equally famously, "Ginned Up" by the Republicans. As opposed to arousing the people's indignation, it seems, the concept "Rev Up" or getting "Keyed up" does not apply to the current Republican control of the federal legislatures. "Gin Ups" are rabble rousing incidents created out of nothing.

What does gin up mean? gin up Definition. Meaning of gin up. OnlineSlangDictionary.com

Historically, Abraham Lincoln, in fact, did not come to office with the intent of creating a Constitutional Amendment, abolishing slavery. The South in fact created a Israeli Level, infamous atrocity--the concept of a pre-emptive strike, with no basis in a genuine threat. Fort Sumter was attacked. Jews themselves are not a genuine threat, internationally, for example. Their reliance on the non-existent deity of human subjugation, in their Moses Atrocity--nowhere so-called--is also an atrocity of European Civilization, generally. Catholics and Protestants are all on board. By the time of Civil War, in fact, a slave was worth upwards of $2500 per person, and pretty much self-reliant. A mule was maybe worth $25.00, and hungry. An acre of land was worth a dollar, more or less. The South was under attack, but even though it was not.

The Republicans are also a rich person's party--Trump and Fiorina, most notably on the recent stages. Carly Fiorina ginned up a crisis over some kid, stillborn. Cemeteries know that stillborn babies happen.

The GOP tends to be supportive of Western Civilization generally. The basis atrocity revealed in Matthew 25:14-30--most recently the foreclosure crisis and the Great Recession--has remedy in Matthew 20:1-16, not applied until mostly the union cost-of-living adjustments of the 1940's. A $0.01 per hour raise was paid for every 0.3 rise of the Consumer Price Index: Equally to everyone covered in the CBA. That then got replaced with the fixed percentage COLA, most famously made permanent in Social Security by Richard Nixon, President, of the famous peculiar hiring tendencies. He himself wanted to not be thought a crook. So he hired some, and the rest is history(?).

Now there is no clear concept of how the Republicans intend to run the federal legislatures. Benghazi is no longer regarded a genuine investigative committee. Millions have health plans under ObamaCare. Possibly not even Trump even knows what the legislation is all about. The emails are being expunged and scrutinized by the Clinton lawyers and the FBI.

Essentially, now the entire GOP would be regarded a "Ginned Up" brand.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Lands of Many Nations: Know this Concept. . .deeply and personally! Maybe now able to join USC football team!)
(IMO)

You are either totally ignorant of historical facts as applied to a natural moral law --- or, you simply have a hatred for Jews.

Cannot think of another position?

As far as why you would want to defend liars or criminal behavior, or if it is simply you are naive enough to think the democrats are superior in goodness and the answer to our many ills --- I guess I can live without finding out the answer to that.
 
The "Great Compromise" had limited the slave trade, in the Constitution. Inadvertently, that likely became a clarion cause of the Civil War. Slaves were at first no longer really needed. Then they were, and they were each worth a bundle. The Constitution is not altogether the answer to centuries of tyranny. It can be worth a bundle to a few. In the slavery example, it managed to became even widely perceived a basis of tyranny, enslavement.

So even in the new concept of excitement of causes, with no basis in evidence or pretense of fact: Then there is enshrined a Goebbels-level tyranny, of mass persuasion gone mad. The current volley of "ginned up" crises has legal basis.

So I would be said an anarchist: Consider that in the concept of democratic rules in nations, the refusing to aid in the matter of an atrocity in one nation: Is not unlawful in all the other nations. A Holocaust lawful in all the other nations could exist even prior to WWII, in the one nation. Massive starvation in East Africa, or North Korea--is actually lawful in all the other nations. You do not get arrested for it, tried or convicted--for even not trying to end it.

So an unthinking Lincoln actually decided to reinforce the Fort, instead of offering other basis for conflict resolution, and nation-wide binding. The perception was that he was going to break the law, all by himself. That he refused to defuse. So instead the atrocity went forward. He took a bullet to the brain, and got himself a monument that at least has to be. . . cleared up every so often.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Lands of Many Nations Understand Trail of Tears: Well Ginned Up(?)!)
 

Forum List

Back
Top