MLB Players Forced to Endorse Homosexuality

Let's rephrase that... Yes you do need to force tolerance.. becuz you think any opposition to "gay pride" is morally .. and.. should be legally unacceptable.

Did I mention "legally"?

Nope.

I think that a society is a place where people live together. We're social animals. The more tolerant people are, the more they LEARN (not force) tolerance, the more tolerant they are.

Why do you think being a total ******* asshole is a positive skill set?

Literally people who have high EQ often make more money. It's a good skill.
 
White Pride rallies aren't a "political event". They are a family celebration and the ability of White Nationalist Nazis to have basic human protections from discrimination and abuse.

See how that works?

No I don't. White Pride rallies are a "political event" because their purpose is to threaten other races, religions and cultures. In Charlottesville they chanted "The Jews will not replace us" as they marched past the synagogues on a Friday night. They beat up counter protestors and 3 people died.

Get back to us when Gay Pride events are used to attacked straight people and send them to the hospital. Gay Pride events are a celebration of the right to be themselves.

Big difference.
 
A player choosing not to wear a "gay pride" symbol.. is being a ******* asshole? What .. exactly.. is the subject being discussed? I don't endorse any form of being a ******* asshole.

Imagine you're a player of a baseball team. On average there would be two or three gay people. You're in a team, and you're telling your team mates that you hate them.

Is that being an asshole? Yeah.
 
Did I mention "legally"?

Nope.

I think that a society is a place where people live together. We're social animals. The more tolerant people are, the more they LEARN (not force) tolerance, the more tolerant they are.

Why do you think being a total ******* asshole is a positive skill set?

Literally people who have high EQ often make more money. It's a good skill.

The idea that people will "learn (not force) tolerance" is laughable. You're asking white people to give up their white privilege and share power because it's the right thing to do.

Without legislation and enforcement, it's NEVER going to happen.
 
Imagine you're a player of a baseball team. On average there would be two or three gay people. You're in a team, and you're telling your team mates that you hate them.

Is that being an asshole? Yeah.
.. and yet it's never an issue for you to be a ******* asshole to a Trump voter. They are openly called every name in the book. Better to table the political endorsements and let sports just be sports. Better for everyone.
 
Imagine you're a player of a baseball team. On average there would be two or three gay people. You're in a team, and you're telling your team mates that you hate them.

Is that being an asshole? Yeah.

The idea that people will "learn (not force) tolerance" is laughable. You're asking white people to give up their white privilege and share power because it's the right thing to do.

Without legislation and enforcement, it's NEVER going to happen.
Never saw so much dramatic logic fail. Mind boggling.
 
The idea that people will "learn (not force) tolerance" is laughable. You're asking white people to give up their white privilege and share power because it's the right thing to do.

Without legislation and enforcement, it's NEVER going to happen.
I disagree. Well, I think you need leadership.

In the UK teachers have to teach tolerance, and people get more tolerant because school has tolerance, football teaches tolerance. Doesn't mean everyone gets tolerant though.

In Germany and Austria you have West Germany taking all the blame for WW2, and they are much more tolerant. Yes, there was a certain amount of legislation, banning the Nazi salute, but it's also banned in Austria and they can super racist.

What made the difference was education. West Germans were educated to make sure WW2 never happened again. Austrians were education as if it weren't their fault and the East Germans were told to be good Communists.

So you can see the tolerance in Germany on election maps.

1781786892514.webp


This is the main far right party in Germany. The NPD or now called Die Heimat. (The homeland).


1781787019688.webp


And this is an election map of who won where according to Proportional Representation. It's pretty clear that the AfD are a further right party.

Tolerance is evidence in the former West Germany and completely lacking in the former East Germany.
 
.. and yet it's never an issue for you to be a ******* asshole to a Trump voter. They are openly called every name in the book. Better to table the political endorsements and let sports just be sports. Better for everyone.

Well, a lot of people see the difference between being born something, and choosing something.

Your argument is basically that I have to be tolerant of intolerant people.

Then again I've had friends with weird views. I am tolerant. I can be around people. However when I come on to a political forum like this, I'm less tolerant because MAGA arguments are SO ******* SHIT, day in, day out. It's almost impossible to have a conversation with MAGA. I can't remember the last time I had a conversation with a MAGA person who actually made a logical argument and backed it up with evidence. Probably NEVER.

The fact that you don't understand tolerance for the way people were born or what they are that they didn't get to choose, ie, gender, ethnicity, sexuality, disabilities, is hardly ******* surprising is it.
 
Never saw so much dramatic logic fail. Mind boggling.

Thank you for saying NOTHING. Your "say nothing" post is mind boggling indeed. Try parsing why this is a "logic fail".

There is zero logic or explanation in your post, just an admission you're confused and don't know how to respond.
 
Your argument is basically that I have to be tolerant of intolerant people.
Really? Did I ask you.. or.. tell you who or what to tolerate? My argument is this: Do not require a collective political endorsement as a condition of employment becuz it forces some individuals to violate their conscience.
 
Yeah, the players should all be black and chained to a boat just before the game, before they're released into a cage where the good ol' white folk can watch and sneer and jeer and throw insults at the lowly black athletes.
This comment is so ignorant, so f**king stupid, so full of shit, so remarkably dumb that I can't believe an adult would post it.
You must be a child. A very immature and very ignorant child using ridiculous hyperbole, stomping your feet like the little p*ssy you are.
There's a big difference between not wanting major league sports to specifically cater to the gay community and wanting blacks in chains, you asshole.
Because clearly you with your superior views of bigotry and stupidity are far better than all black people, including those who were a part of NASA that sent men to the Moon. Because you send your load to the Moon every day with some underaged girl.
Of course, you would never say this to my face. Instead you cower behind your keyboard like the spoiled little brat you are, knowing that if you dared say this to my face, it would not end well for you.
GFY.
 
Really? Did I ask you.. or.. tell you who or what to tolerate? My argument is this: Do not require a collective political endorsement as a condition of employment becuz it forces some individuals to violate their conscience.

Most people who claim someone else having sex "violates their conscience" are just using religion to reinforce their bigotry.

Is it really a "conscience"? I can't see it.

And if you work in a team, if you work for a company that has more than one person, you have to deal with them. You might work with black people, gay people, women, whatever. You need to be tolerant.

Why any different for baseball players?
 
15th post
Have you ever been to Thailand? They have gay people, ladyboys and all that. Nobody cares because nobody pounds on them.

The ONLY REASON you have gay pride, is because of religious bigots who go around trying to tell everyone that this shouldn't happen.

Don't do it, get all these bigots to let gay people do, and gay pride will die. Because there won't be any point to it. It'll be like Thailand where you see some ladyboys but it won't even be an issue.
I am pretty old myself and the only people objecting to gsys are those, like myself, screaming "leave me alone". Take your flags, rainbows, bandage gear, and parades and leave everyone else alone, especially children. Just mind your own business and stop demanding support from people who don't want to have anything to do with your performance nonsense.
 
Really? Did I ask you.. or.. tell you who or what to tolerate? My argument is this: Do not require a collective political endorsement as a condition of employment becuz it forces some individuals to violate their conscience.

It doesn't "force" anything. Nobody forces you to work for any employer. If their policies "violate your conscience", don't take the job. I've turned down jobs with companies and individuals I thought were odious at best.

I used to joke that by taking a job with a big Bay Street law firm as an aging hippy, I was "selling my soul to the Devil". But I made the choice to take those jobs. Nobody "forced" me to "violate my conscience".
 
Tolerance does not mean you get to demand that everyone else has to change their behavior for you. Tolerance is you wear your flag but no one else has to. Tolerance is, you get to wear a Bible verse but no one else has to. Team uniforms mean no patches, no Bible verses for anyone.
 
Back
Top Bottom