MLB Players Forced to Endorse Homosexuality

[drudge X]

Why are you the stupidest version of yourself?

You smart? Answer the question.

 

[otto105]

Back to your trolling ways I see.

Nice to see you're as blind, deaf, and brain dead as ever.

Hilarious

No lube for you.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

I prefer ICE appreciation night.

That would actually be legit since it honors law enforcement.

 

[otto105]

That would actually be legit since it honors law enforcement.

Just like J6 does.

 

[drudge X]

Just like J6 does.

Like Harris bailed out blm looters and rioters?

 

[otto105]

Like Harris bailed out blm looters and rioters?

Hilarious

Free Derek!

 

[cowboy fan]

Yeah... and... , I can't lower myself to your level to explain how *** dumb what you wrote was.

Then learn how the forum works. Duh

 

[cowboy fan]

Thank you for saying NOTHING. Your "say nothing" post is mind boggling indeed. Try parsing why this is a "logic fail".

There is zero logic or explanation in your post, just an admission you're confused and don't know how to respond.

So more logic fail on top of logic fail. Too funny.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Then learn how the forum works. Duh

Oh, I should learn how the forum works, should I?

Oh, the forum works by someone posting something so vague nobody knows what you're talking about. Then they tell you this, and instead of making things clearer, you act like everyone's stupid for not being able to understand something super vague.

Yeah, I see how the forum works. I see it every day.

 

[cowboy fan]

Oh, I should learn how the forum works, should I?

Oh, the forum works by someone posting something so vague nobody knows what you're talking about. Then they tell you this, and instead of making things clearer, you act like everyone's stupid for not being able to understand something super vague.

Yeah, I see how the forum works. I see it every day.

I quoted two posts. Your post and that homosexual guy named dragon lady. My reply was to both of you. Get it now?

 

[frigidweirdo]

So more logic fail on top of logic fail. Too funny.

This is the point where you say WHY it is a logic fail.

But I doubt you can.

 

[frigidweirdo]

I quoted two posts. Your post and that homosexual guy named dragon lady. My reply was to both of you. Get it now?

Yeah, now I get it.

Only took you, what, four posts to explain that you thought both posts were a fail.

I wonder how many posts it would take you to actually explain why. 100? 1000? MAGA?

 

[cowboy fan]

This is the point where you say WHY it is a logic fail.

But I doubt you can.

Already said it. But you will keep crying, denier.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Already said it. But you will keep crying, denier.

If you think that, then I feel sorry for you. Maybe you just didn't get a good enough education.

 

[ding]

Have you asked your partner?

Well, mom.

Son, your dad says if it smells like shit it is probably shit.

 

[ding]

You ok if MLB is promoting baseball to ISIS?

Do you honestly believe they could make a buck doing that? Despite what you may believe this is a promotion aimed at growing fans.

 

[ding]

Why are you the stupidest version of yourself?

I wonder that about you all the time.

 

[LeftofLeft]

Why is it that Republicans/Trump Humpers/MAGA/conservatives, etc. are always talking about and worrying about gay folks?

Show us how Blacks embrace LBGTQ?

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Are they forcing them to "espouse beliefs"????

The problem with this argument is that, I go to work, and there's a gay person at work, so I sue my employer for forcing me to not lynch the gay guy at work. "Oh, it goes against my beliefs, I should have gay forced down my throat every day."

That's not a problem with my argument at all. That's an absurd extrapolation on your part with no bearing in reality, which you knew when you wrote it, but what else are you going to say when you know you're wrong?

That's not how it works. You go to work, you have to accept the people you work with.

You don't have to like it, but you have to accept different people. You have to accept people are different.

You can't go around demanding everyone fits into your views.

Who said otherwise?

Human Rights are essentially "you can do whatever you want, as long as you don't harm others", the idea is you're free up until the point when you interact with others, and then your rights and their rights collide. Whose rights come out on top? Well, neither really, both people are then forced to submit (might be the wrong verb, whatever) to the fact that the other person should not be harmed. Within normal society that "harmed" becomes something weaker. We should try and get along with those we work with, even if we don't like that person.

I don't like the ****** from Mississippi, I no longer talk socially to the guy, but I tolerate him when he talks work to me, I don't go up to his face and tell him I hate him. That's life.

I certainly don't agree with his views either.

None of this applies to forcing your employees to promote political messages. PERIOD.

Should they be forced to wear red "Make America Great Again" hats if the team decides to have a MAGA night? Should they be forced to wear hats with the thin blue line if they decide to have an "Honor the Police" night?

Do you feel it was appropriate for the Dodgers to promote a group openly hostile to a major world religion, particularly one that undoubtedly several players practice not to mention many attendees of the game being how heavily Latino Los Angeles is? (They'd have never DARED insult Muslims like that.)

If they want to sponsor a Pride Night, have at it. Put up decorations or whatever you want, but you don't force your employees to don their garb and promote it at a personal level. That's coercion, plain and simple. You know it and I know it.

 

[GLASNOST]

They can just pay their fines.

Are there fines to pay? They are on contract, right? They like/want to play, right? They haven't refused to play. The burden must be on the owners, not on the players. Right? Wrong?