Two words: judicial appointments.
It wouldn’t lead to a ‘theocracy’ but a republican president appointing radical rightist ideologues to the Federal courts – and indeed justices to the Supreme Court – could seriously undermine and erode our civil liberties and expand government authority into our private lives. The rights to privacy, due process, and equal protection of the law could be seriously curtailed, along with the abandonment of the rule of law, where citizens’ rights would be subject to majority rule.
again,given how hard it is for any one judge to move the other eight, this is mostly a bugaboo you frighten yourself with that has no basis anywhere.
And again, assuming that conservatives actualy want this.
Your reasoning failure seems to be that since you believe Conservatives to be stupid therefore they want a nut ball iranian style goofball theo state. This fear has no basis in reality, but is entirrely the fault of you eating too many anchovy pizzas.
Assuming this to be true, you then assume that one or two judges will matter. Regan and Bush appointed five. How far did they move the ball? Then there is the little matter of seante confirmation.
To reiterate, no one but a few random nut balls wants what you think we want, and even if we were stupid enough to want it, the proces makes it impossible to get.
