Mitt Romney 'formally not invited' to CPAC after impeachment vote on witnesses

[Ray From Cleveland]

No, not at all. You highlight something else he's said so many times "Folks, if you ever want to know what Democrats are up to, just pay attention to what they accuse the Republicans of."

That is classic projection. No one has caused more to the division of this nation than Rush.

What??? Are you trying to be funny here or something?

The Democrats when from Democrat to liberal. From liberal to progressive. From progressive to liberal Socialism. Their last three presidential contenders had the blessing from the US Communist Party, and one of their front runners--Sander's, they couldn't say enough about him.

On the right, more are leaning towards constitutionalism; former Tea Party people.

So where is this middle ground between constitutionalism and Communism? There is none. But remember what party took the largest and most frequent moves.

Notwithstanding it is not true about the communist party, Trump had the blessing of the Nazi party. So what the hell is you point?

The only policy of Trump's they agree with is his border stance, because the south are people of color. Other than that, they have no similarities.

If you bother to read the US Communist Party platform, you'd be hell pressed to find many differences between them and the Democrat platform. Not one or two issues that accidentally works in their favor, but most of them.

That is out and out false. I see this written a lot. Provide me a link so I can read it.

Yikes! Look who just endorsed Obama for 4 more years - WND

Chavez, Castro, Putin endorse Obama - WND

https://www.usnews.com/news/article...ty-leader-voted-for-sanders-will-back-clinton

 

[Katniss]

Not sure if there was a thread on this yet or not, I didn't see one in Politics.

Judging by reactions online, there are a number of conservatives who are angry:

Mitt Romney 'formally not invited' to CPAC after impeachment vote on witnesses

The chairman of CPAC announced that Utah Sen. Mitt Romney is "formally not invited" to the conservative group's annual conference this year.


Matt Schlapp, the head of the American Conservative Union, said Romney is not allowed at the event after the Utah Republican voted in favor of summoning witnesses in the Senate impeachment trial of President Trump. Romney was one of two Republicans who joined 47 Democrats in supporting the motion, which failed to pass on Friday.

"BREAKING: The 'extreme conservative' and Junior Senator from the great state of Utah, @SenatorRomney is formally NOT invited to #CPAC2020," Schlapp wrote in a tweet, which featured a photo of a troubled-looking Romney.

Can Willard "Mitt" Romney be expelled from the Republican party and forced to run as an independant?

That would be the worst thing. He would syphon Republican voters away from our candidate. That's why Sander's never ran as a Socialist. The two-party system is alive and well.

It's Utah. Romney was elected because he was the GOP nominee. As an independent he would gain VERY little support. The Mormon church is already turning against him.

I don't think they are turning against him. He's their front man who helps makes them appear mainstream. They are not looking to attract any attention. Perception is very important to them.

No, they are absolutely turning from him.
US election: Mormon Church in UK distancing itself from Mitt Romney's political campaign

I thought Romney was a US Senator. When did he get elected to British Parliament?

 

[Uncensored2008]

No, not at all. You highlight something else he's said so many times "Folks, if you ever want to know what Democrats are up to, just pay attention to what they accuse the Republicans of."

That is classic projection. No one has caused more to the division of this nation than Rush.

What??? Are you trying to be funny here or something?

The Democrats when from Democrat to liberal. From liberal to progressive. From progressive to liberal Socialism. Their last three presidential contenders had the blessing from the US Communist Party, and one of their front runners--Sander's, they couldn't say enough about him.

On the right, more are leaning towards constitutionalism; former Tea Party people.

So where is this middle ground between constitutionalism and Communism? There is none. But remember what party took the largest and most frequent moves.

Notwithstanding it is not true about the communist party, Trump had the blessing of the Nazi party. So what the hell is you point?

The only policy of Trump's they agree with is his border stance, because the south are people of color. Other than that, they have no similarities.

If you bother to read the US Communist Party platform, you'd be hell pressed to find many differences between them and the Democrat platform. Not one or two issues that accidentally works in their favor, but most of them.

sorta true--------now that anyone living in South America or has ancestry
in South Amerca has BECOME a "person of color" regardless of
actual "color"

The funny thing is that Argentina has actual segregation. I think they are a more white nation than the USA.

 

[JLW]

That is classic projection. No one has caused more to the division of this nation than Rush.

What??? Are you trying to be funny here or something?

The Democrats when from Democrat to liberal. From liberal to progressive. From progressive to liberal Socialism. Their last three presidential contenders had the blessing from the US Communist Party, and one of their front runners--Sander's, they couldn't say enough about him.

On the right, more are leaning towards constitutionalism; former Tea Party people.

So where is this middle ground between constitutionalism and Communism? There is none. But remember what party took the largest and most frequent moves.

Notwithstanding it is not true about the communist party, Trump had the blessing of the Nazi party. So what the hell is you point?

The only policy of Trump's they agree with is his border stance, because the south are people of color. Other than that, they have no similarities.

If you bother to read the US Communist Party platform, you'd be hell pressed to find many differences between them and the Democrat platform. Not one or two issues that accidentally works in their favor, but most of them.

That is out and out false. I see this written a lot. Provide me a link so I can read it.

Yikes! Look who just endorsed Obama for 4 more years - WND

Chavez, Castro, Putin endorse Obama - WND

https://www.usnews.com/news/article...ty-leader-voted-for-sanders-will-back-clinton

You have to go to world news daily. That website is notoriously right wing. No foreign leader did more for Trump than Putin and only Trump congratulated the Chinese government for 70 years of communist rule. No Democratic leader congratulated Xi.

 

[Nostra]

In the post I quoted, moron.

Right here:

Just like Trump. Who’d figure that Trump supporters and Trafficant supporters were one in the same. I’ll have to remember this. It says a helluva lot. Corruption is secondary to the entertainment value they provide.

So what...Idiot. You said he was entertaining I said like Trump. What you insecure mind reads into it afterward is your psychological issue. Where Di I say Nosepick is a Trafficant supporter?

You claimed I supported him.

You have been caught in yet another lie, idiot.

Show me where I said Nosetro is a Trafficant supporter? You can’t. Damn liar.

Already did, Chowderhead.

I'm not following you down your rabbit hole today. You got busted in yet another lie.

Deal with it.

You proved nothing but that you lied.

Have fun down your rabbit hole playing with yourself, liar.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Romney forgot what the media did to him in 2012

No he didn’t. He willfully sacrificed himself on the alter to let the Hussein win. He was a wimp, and never had any intention of winning.

I disagree he wanted to win he wants to be the democrat write in

 

[Nostra]

Yes, he is an entertainer. So what? That doesn't mean what he says isn't the truth. He's absolutely correct on so many things while still entertaining at the same time.

The more outrageous Rush is, the more money he makes. The more angry people get, the more they tune in, the more money he makes. Think about it.

Not at all. Years ago I was ignorant about politics. I didn't care much about it. As I got older and into my early 30's, I started to pay more attention.

One day at a family doing, my father and I were arguing about politics; our favorite pastime Dad and son thing we did. My then brother-in-law was helping my sister bring dinner to the table. As he listened on, he said "You must be a diehard Rush fan" as he chuckled. I had no idea WTF he was even talking about. Rush? That's one of my favorite bands out of Canada!!!!

Some time went by, and the Democrats did something (I forget what now) that really pissed me off. I recalled the comment my brother-in-law made to me months ago, and found this Rush guy.

I was amazed. It was like my thoughts were being amplified over the radio. Unlike the left who are slaves to NPR and CNN, Rush didn't tell me what to think, he broadcast what I've been thinking all along, and from that time, I was a fan. It's that way with most of his listeners.

Rush tells how his listeners to think every day. His broadcast is pure opinion. Rush is entertaining I will give him that. But don’t confuse his opinion for news.

It's funny to me how Dimwingers whine and cry about Rush, but turn around and claim they listen to him every day.

I'm sure Rush thanks you for his fat wallet, Rube.

Where the hell did I say I listen to Rush everyday, liar?

Right here, Dummy:

Rush tells how his listeners to think every day.

Either you are lying about what Rush says every day, or you listen to him every day to know what he says every day. Which is it? Are you a liar, or a Rush daily listener?

 

[Nostra]

No, not at all. You highlight something else he's said so many times "Folks, if you ever want to know what Democrats are up to, just pay attention to what they accuse the Republicans of."

That is classic projection. No one has caused more to the division of this nation than Rush.

What??? Are you trying to be funny here or something?

The Democrats when from Democrat to liberal. From liberal to progressive. From progressive to liberal Socialism. Their last three presidential contenders had the blessing from the US Communist Party, and one of their front runners--Sander's, they couldn't say enough about him.

On the right, more are leaning towards constitutionalism; former Tea Party people.

So where is this middle ground between constitutionalism and Communism? There is none. But remember what party took the largest and most frequent moves.

Notwithstanding it is not true about the communist party, Trump had the blessing of the Nazi party. So what the hell is you point?

which Nazi party?

Lol..all those white supremacy organizations that backed Trump..give me a break..

listen I only brought it up because of Ray’s comment about the communist party.

https://www.usnews.com/news/article...-quigg-endorses-hillary-clinton-for-president

 

[Nostra]

Not at all. Years ago I was ignorant about politics. I didn't care much about it. As I got older and into my early 30's, I started to pay more attention.

One day at a family doing, my father and I were arguing about politics; our favorite pastime Dad and son thing we did. My then brother-in-law was helping my sister bring dinner to the table. As he listened on, he said "You must be a diehard Rush fan" as he chuckled. I had no idea WTF he was even talking about. Rush? That's one of my favorite bands out of Canada!!!!

Some time went by, and the Democrats did something (I forget what now) that really pissed me off. I recalled the comment my brother-in-law made to me months ago, and found this Rush guy.

I was amazed. It was like my thoughts were being amplified over the radio. Unlike the left who are slaves to NPR and CNN, Rush didn't tell me what to think, he broadcast what I've been thinking all along, and from that time, I was a fan. It's that way with most of his listeners.

Rush tells how his listeners to think every day. His broadcast is pure opinion. Rush is entertaining I will give him that. But don’t confuse his opinion for news.

No, not at all. You highlight something else he's said so many times "Folks, if you ever want to know what Democrats are up to, just pay attention to what they accuse the Republicans of."

That is classic projection. No one has caused more to the division of this nation than Rush.

Liberals refer to truth telling as “division” while slurping up media PC drivel.

Yeah, I Don’t disagree that there is more PC drivel that’s I can take at times, but nothing that equals the divisive rhetoric that comes from Rush.

To know that you would have to be an avid listener to Rush.

I'm sure Rush's fat wallet thanks you.

 

[WEATHER53]

What??? Are you trying to be funny here or something?

The Democrats when from Democrat to liberal. From liberal to progressive. From progressive to liberal Socialism. Their last three presidential contenders had the blessing from the US Communist Party, and one of their front runners--Sander's, they couldn't say enough about him.

On the right, more are leaning towards constitutionalism; former Tea Party people.

So where is this middle ground between constitutionalism and Communism? There is none. But remember what party took the largest and most frequent moves.

Notwithstanding it is not true about the communist party, Trump had the blessing of the Nazi party. So what the hell is you point?

The only policy of Trump's they agree with is his border stance, because the south are people of color. Other than that, they have no similarities.

If you bother to read the US Communist Party platform, you'd be hell pressed to find many differences between them and the Democrat platform. Not one or two issues that accidentally works in their favor, but most of them.

That is out and out false. I see this written a lot. Provide me a link so I can read it.

Yikes! Look who just endorsed Obama for 4 more years - WND

Chavez, Castro, Putin endorse Obama - WND

https://www.usnews.com/news/article...ty-leader-voted-for-sanders-will-back-clinton

You have to go to world news daily. That website is notoriously right wing. No foreign leader did more for Trump than Putin and only Trump congratulated the Chinese government for 70 years of communist rule. No Democratic leader congratulated Xi.

See we get lots of “agrees and winner” and you get lots of “laughs”
Learn from that.

 

[Katniss]

I'd say he's more of an Independent these days. He still believes in the traditional republican platform which the trump republicans no longer believe in.

You have it backwards . It is Trump who is an independent, not Romney.

By your own admission, it is Romney who wants the same old same old, so he couldn't possibly be considered at all independent.

We will have to disagree. Trump is not an independent. He is attempting to convert america from a republic to an authoritarian country where everyone must do exactly as he demands or he will crush them. I'm just waiting for him to start having his opponents and those who speak out against him assassinated. I imagine that will be coming soon since the senate republicans have said he can do whatever he wants without recourse.

You think he is going to have people assassinated?

Did you skip your pills this morning or something?

I think Trump is capable of anything considering his history and recent actions. Your other comment isn't worth addressing.

Paranoid schizophrenia should never be the source of your political opinions.

You might want to offer that advice to the rush limbaugh lovers. Talk about coo coo

 

[JLW]

The more outrageous Rush is, the more money he makes. The more angry people get, the more they tune in, the more money he makes. Think about it.

Not at all. Years ago I was ignorant about politics. I didn't care much about it. As I got older and into my early 30's, I started to pay more attention.

One day at a family doing, my father and I were arguing about politics; our favorite pastime Dad and son thing we did. My then brother-in-law was helping my sister bring dinner to the table. As he listened on, he said "You must be a diehard Rush fan" as he chuckled. I had no idea WTF he was even talking about. Rush? That's one of my favorite bands out of Canada!!!!

Some time went by, and the Democrats did something (I forget what now) that really pissed me off. I recalled the comment my brother-in-law made to me months ago, and found this Rush guy.

I was amazed. It was like my thoughts were being amplified over the radio. Unlike the left who are slaves to NPR and CNN, Rush didn't tell me what to think, he broadcast what I've been thinking all along, and from that time, I was a fan. It's that way with most of his listeners.

Rush tells how his listeners to think every day. His broadcast is pure opinion. Rush is entertaining I will give him that. But don’t confuse his opinion for news.

It's funny to me how Dimwingers whine and cry about Rush, but turn around and claim they listen to him every day.

I'm sure Rush thanks you for his fat wallet, Rube.

Where the hell did I say I listen to Rush everyday, liar?

Right here, Dummy:

Rush tells how his listeners to think every day.

Either you are lying about what Rush says every day, or you listen to him every day to know what he says every day. Which is it? Are you a liar, or a Rush daily listener?

Not even close. Learn to read..

 

[Nostra]

You have it backwards . It is Trump who is an independent, not Romney.

By your own admission, it is Romney who wants the same old same old, so he couldn't possibly be considered at all independent.

We will have to disagree. Trump is not an independent. He is attempting to convert america from a republic to an authoritarian country where everyone must do exactly as he demands or he will crush them. I'm just waiting for him to start having his opponents and those who speak out against him assassinated. I imagine that will be coming soon since the senate republicans have said he can do whatever he wants without recourse.

You think he is going to have people assassinated?

Did you skip your pills this morning or something?

I think Trump is capable of anything considering his history and recent actions. Your other comment isn't worth addressing.

Paranoid schizophrenia should never be the source of your political opinions.

You might want to offer that advice to the rush limbaugh lovers. Talk about coo coo

You can start with JohnLaw........he says he is a daily listener.

 

[Katniss]

We will have to disagree. Trump is not an independent. He is attempting to convert america from a republic to an authoritarian country where everyone must do exactly as he demands or he will crush them. I'm just waiting for him to start having his opponents and those who speak out against him assassinated. I imagine that will be coming soon since the senate republicans have said he can do whatever he wants without recourse.

You think he is going to have people assassinated?

Did you skip your pills this morning or something?

I think Trump is capable of anything considering his history and recent actions. Your other comment isn't worth addressing.

Paranoid schizophrenia should never be the source of your political opinions.

You might want to offer that advice to the rush limbaugh lovers. Talk about coo coo

You can start with JohnLaw........he says he is a daily listener.

None of us are perfect. (grin)

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Not sure if there was a thread on this yet or not, I didn't see one in Politics.

Judging by reactions online, there are a number of conservatives who are angry:

Mitt Romney 'formally not invited' to CPAC after impeachment vote on witnesses

The chairman of CPAC announced that Utah Sen. Mitt Romney is "formally not invited" to the conservative group's annual conference this year.


Matt Schlapp, the head of the American Conservative Union, said Romney is not allowed at the event after the Utah Republican voted in favor of summoning witnesses in the Senate impeachment trial of President Trump. Romney was one of two Republicans who joined 47 Democrats in supporting the motion, which failed to pass on Friday.

"BREAKING: The 'extreme conservative' and Junior Senator from the great state of Utah, @SenatorRomney is formally NOT invited to #CPAC2020," Schlapp wrote in a tweet, which featured a photo of a troubled-looking Romney.

Such is the authoritarian right, fearful of dissent, seeks to compel conformity.

 

[irosie91]

That is classic projection. No one has caused more to the division of this nation than Rush.

What??? Are you trying to be funny here or something?

The Democrats when from Democrat to liberal. From liberal to progressive. From progressive to liberal Socialism. Their last three presidential contenders had the blessing from the US Communist Party, and one of their front runners--Sander's, they couldn't say enough about him.

On the right, more are leaning towards constitutionalism; former Tea Party people.

So where is this middle ground between constitutionalism and Communism? There is none. But remember what party took the largest and most frequent moves.

Notwithstanding it is not true about the communist party, Trump had the blessing of the Nazi party. So what the hell is you point?

The only policy of Trump's they agree with is his border stance, because the south are people of color. Other than that, they have no similarities.

If you bother to read the US Communist Party platform, you'd be hell pressed to find many differences between them and the Democrat platform. Not one or two issues that accidentally works in their favor, but most of them.

sorta true--------now that anyone living in South America or has ancestry
in South Amerca has BECOME a "person of color" regardless of
actual "color"

The funny thing is that Argentina has actual segregation. I think they are a more white nation than the USA.

more than funny------it was Spanish controlled south America that INVENTED
segregation in this hemisphere. Now----somehow-----even the Spanish from
SPAIN--------seem to have adopted the "I IS A PERSON OF COLOR" bs

 

[irosie91]

You think he is going to have people assassinated?

Did you skip your pills this morning or something?

I think Trump is capable of anything considering his history and recent actions. Your other comment isn't worth addressing.

Paranoid schizophrenia should never be the source of your political opinions.

You might want to offer that advice to the rush limbaugh lovers. Talk about coo coo

You can start with JohnLaw........he says he is a daily listener.

None of us are perfect. (grin)

you are RIGHT------none of us IS perfect

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Yes, he is an entertainer. So what? That doesn't mean what he says isn't the truth. He's absolutely correct on so many things while still entertaining at the same time.

The more outrageous Rush is, the more money he makes. The more angry people get, the more they tune in, the more money he makes. Think about it.

Not at all. Years ago I was ignorant about politics. I didn't care much about it. As I got older and into my early 30's, I started to pay more attention.

One day at a family doing, my father and I were arguing about politics; our favorite pastime Dad and son thing we did. My then brother-in-law was helping my sister bring dinner to the table. As he listened on, he said "You must be a diehard Rush fan" as he chuckled. I had no idea WTF he was even talking about. Rush? That's one of my favorite bands out of Canada!!!!

Some time went by, and the Democrats did something (I forget what now) that really pissed me off. I recalled the comment my brother-in-law made to me months ago, and found this Rush guy.

I was amazed. It was like my thoughts were being amplified over the radio. Unlike the left who are slaves to NPR and CNN, Rush didn't tell me what to think, he broadcast what I've been thinking all along, and from that time, I was a fan. It's that way with most of his listeners.

Rush tells how his listeners to think every day. His broadcast is pure opinion. Rush is entertaining I will give him that. But don’t confuse his opinion for news.

No, not at all. You highlight something else he's said so many times "Folks, if you ever want to know what Democrats are up to, just pay attention to what they accuse the Republicans of."

That is classic projection. No one has caused more to the division of this nation than Rush.

Except for Trump.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Yes, he is an entertainer. So what? That doesn't mean what he says isn't the truth. He's absolutely correct on so many things while still entertaining at the same time.

The more outrageous Rush is, the more money he makes. The more angry people get, the more they tune in, the more money he makes. Think about it.

Not at all. Years ago I was ignorant about politics. I didn't care much about it. As I got older and into my early 30's, I started to pay more attention.

One day at a family doing, my father and I were arguing about politics; our favorite pastime Dad and son thing we did. My then brother-in-law was helping my sister bring dinner to the table. As he listened on, he said "You must be a diehard Rush fan" as he chuckled. I had no idea WTF he was even talking about. Rush? That's one of my favorite bands out of Canada!!!!

Some time went by, and the Democrats did something (I forget what now) that really pissed me off. I recalled the comment my brother-in-law made to me months ago, and found this Rush guy.

I was amazed. It was like my thoughts were being amplified over the radio. Unlike the left who are slaves to NPR and CNN, Rush didn't tell me what to think, he broadcast what I've been thinking all along, and from that time, I was a fan. It's that way with most of his listeners.

Rush tells how his listeners to think every day. His broadcast is pure opinion. Rush is entertaining I will give him that. But don’t confuse his opinion for news.

No, not at all. You highlight something else he's said so many times "Folks, if you ever want to know what Democrats are up to, just pay attention to what they accuse the Republicans of."

That is classic projection. No one has caused more to the division of this nation than Rush.

Comrade traitor, you misspelled "Obama."

 

[Dogmaphobe]

You have it backwards . It is Trump who is an independent, not Romney.

By your own admission, it is Romney who wants the same old same old, so he couldn't possibly be considered at all independent.

We will have to disagree. Trump is not an independent. He is attempting to convert america from a republic to an authoritarian country where everyone must do exactly as he demands or he will crush them. I'm just waiting for him to start having his opponents and those who speak out against him assassinated. I imagine that will be coming soon since the senate republicans have said he can do whatever he wants without recourse.

You think he is going to have people assassinated?

Did you skip your pills this morning or something?

I think Trump is capable of anything considering his history and recent actions. Your other comment isn't worth addressing.

Paranoid schizophrenia should never be the source of your political opinions.

You might want to offer that advice to the rush limbaugh lovers. Talk about coo coo

You base your political opinions on an overactive imagination driven by paranoia rather than the dispassionate analysis of facts. If any Limbaugh supporters were similarly disposed towards hysteria, I would tell them the same.

If you are a right winger trying to make leftists look utterly unhinged, you have been quite successful. Your combination of stupidity and whackadoodle insanity seems a bit over the top to me, but good job nonetheless.

Yes, by all means just continue imagining Trump killing people and then react to him as if he had. If this isn't just an elaborate joke, I would suggest you talk to your parents about sending you to a therapist while you are still in high school so you can get the help you need before venturing out in the world.