Sunsettommy
Diamond Member
- Mar 19, 2018
- 14,917
- 12,544
- 2,400
- Thread starter
- #61
Haha, not a single research paper was published. Just a hit and run blog. Will we be featuring a powerpoint of this blog at the next IPCC?Ha ha, not a single true counterpoint was made,
No it is a publish paper at springerlink:
The European Physical Journal Plus volume 135, Article number: 462 (2020) Cite this article
Abstract
- 116 Accesses
- 124 Altmetric
- Metricsdetails
The nature of the climate system is reviewed. We then review the history of scientific approaches to major problems in climate, noting that the centrality of the contribution of carbon dioxide is relatively recent, and probably inappropriate to much of the Earth’s climate history. The weakness of characterizing the overall climate behavior using only one physical process, globally averaged radiative forcing, is illustrated by considering the role of an equally well-known process, meridional heat transport by hydrodynamic processes which, by changing the equator-to-pole temperature difference, also impact global mean temperature.
LINK
======
Not a blog at all, you that lazy to look up the link?
The article remains unchallenged.
Climate Contrarian Gets Fact-Checked by MIT Colleagues in Open Letter to Trump - Inside Climate News
Sign up to receive our latest reporting on climate change, energy and environmental justice, sent directly to your inbox. Subscribe here. This story was updated on March 7 to include a statement from Richard Lindzen. Richard Lindzen, an outspoken climate contrarian and retired Massachusetts...insideclimatenews.org
Richard Lindzen, an outspoken climate contrarian and retired Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor, sent a letter last month to President Donald Trump urging him to pull the United States out of the United Nations' climate change regime because global climate action is "not scientifically justified."
After MIT's climate researchers and faculty found out, they wrote their own open letter to the president, setting the record straight.
"As [Lindzen's] colleagues at MIT in the Program in Atmospheres, Oceans and Climate, all of whom are actively involved in understanding climate, we write to make it clear that this is not a view shared by us, or by the overwhelming majority of other scientists who have devoted their professional lives to careful study of climate science," said the March 2 letter, signed by 22 current and retired MIT professors.
So 1 guy vs 22 other guys all from MIT. That is like a 99 percent consensus that he (linden) is a fraud with an audience.
My question is are you the political chick also because you really do sound like her?
Linden is just looking for a job in the Trump administration.
All I see here is another warmist/alarmist dodge of post one article.
Post one article remains unchallenged