MIT Scientist Debunks Global Warming Hysteria

That the majority of the "scientific research" you reference, such as your chain of links/URLs in post #6, receive funding to prove an 'a priory' supporting the ACC/AGW hypothesis, does detract from the validity and psuedo-objectivity of those conclusions.

"a priori" s'il vous plait.

Aussi "pseudo." De rien.
 
By looking at how Democrats have exploited the job losses of the pandemic to look like job OPENINGS that they created.... With half a brain we can understand how they are exploiting long-term climate change to be a result of human activity and not a long-cycle natural global phenomenon. Through this misinformation campaign they are able to justify their desire to control human activity.
 
By looking at how Democrats have exploited the job losses of the pandemic to look like job OPENINGS that they created.... With half a brain we can understand how they are exploiting long-term climate change to be a result of human activity and not a long-cycle natural global phenomenon. Through this misinformation campaign they are able to justify their desire to control human activity.
1659903935007.png
 
The Democrats had to do nothing to gain a political advantage from the pandemic. Trump mismanaged that so badly he couldn't have been re-elected if he'd been revealed to be Jesus. If not for anthropogenic global warming it is very likely that the Earth would have been cooling slightly over the course of the last century-and-a-half. There are no net natural drivers at present for climate warming. People attempting to get governments to take action against AGW aren't trying to gain a political advantage. They're trying to save the human race you fucking idiot.
 
AGW has not been going on for thousands of years.

Irrelevant. AGW doesn't say cold weather will disappear in the immediate future.



Generalized to the point of meaninglessness. Global warming is increasing the frequency and severity of severe weather events.


He includes himself here and expects to be trusted. He has not explained why we shouldn't trust anyone else.

It would be more accurate to describe Mr Lindzen as an employee of the ExxonMobil corporation and more generally by the fossil fuel industry.

*******************
*******************

Background​

Richard S. Lindzen is former Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Meteorology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), a position he held from 1983 until his retirement in 2013. [3], [76], [77]

Lindzen’s academic interests lie within the topics of “climate, planetary waves, monsoon meteorology, planetary atmospheres, and hydrodynamic instability,” according to his faculty profile at MIT. [3]

Lindzen is a former distinguished senior fellow at the Cato Institute‘s Center for the Study of Science. The Center shut down in 2019, and was no longer affiliated with Lindzen at that time. “It’s unclear when he left Cato, and [Spokeswoman Khristine] Brookes declined to comment on personnel issues,” E&E News reported. [2], [101]

The Cato Institute, a conservative think tank where Lindzen has also published numerous articles and studies, has received at least $125,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998. In his 1995 article, “The Heat Is On,” Ross Gelbspan reported Lindzen charged oil and coal organizations $2,500 per day for his consulting services. [4], [5]

Lindzen has described ExxonMobil as “the only principled oil and gas company I know in the U.S.” [6]

In addition to his position at Cato, Lindzen is listed as an “Expert” with the Heartland Institute, a member of the “Academic Advisory Council” of the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF), and an advisor to the CO2 Coalition, a group promoting the benefits of atmospheric carbon dioxide. [58], [59], [62]

Fossil Fuel Funding​

As part of a March 2018 legal case between the cities of San Francisco and Oakland and fossil fuel companies, Lindzen was asked by the judge to disclose any connections he had to connected parties. [94]

In response, Lindzen reported that he had received $25,000 per year for his position at the Cato Institute since 2013. He also disclosed $1,500 from the Texas Public Policy Foundation for a “climate science lecture” in 2017, and approximately $30,000 from Peabody Coal in connection to testimony Lindzen gave at a proceeding of the Minnesota Public Utilities Commissions in September 2015. [98]

Arctic ice free? Check
Snow a thing of the past? Check
Major coastal cities underwater? Check
Guam tipped over? Check
 
By looking at how Democrats have exploited the job losses of the pandemic to look like job OPENINGS that they created.... With half a brain we can understand how they are exploiting long-term climate change to be a result of human activity and not a long-cycle natural global phenomenon. Through this misinformation campaign they are able to justify their desire to control human activity.
Trump mishandled the pandemic. Own it. He lied from the beginning about it and never stopped. He owns his lies and the recession. It was Trump who was in office when the economy went south.
 
Trump mishandled the pandemic. Own it. He lied from the beginning about it and never stopped. He owns his lies and the recession. It was Trump who was in office when the economy went south.

Dems had much better ideas. Like no travel restrictions, more trips on public transportation and more visits to Chinatown.
 
Trump had travel restrictions, Dems whined they were racist and xenophobic.
You twats would have made things worse. Like you always do.
When you restrict entrance from predominantly black nations and allow white infected Europeans to flood our airports, that is racism; that’s trump and that’s why his Humpers luv him.
 
Anyone remember this on the Twilight Zone "The book "To Serve Man" It's a Cookbook!. Don't get on that ship! You will be their next meal."
 
Dagosa has not explicitly stated that the Muslim travel ban was for COVID. And I have seen and read his post #414

In 410, he mentions the pandemic. In 411, I mocked the idea that Dems would have responded in any way that would have made things better than Trump.

I'm talking about Covid restrictions, not ones from months before.
 

Forum List

Back
Top