This assumes that the essential argument is between free markets and socialism. It's not. Neither exists. Here is what does exist. A partnership between the private sector and government. Your rant doesn't explain what's good about things like the Hoover Dam and the national Interstate.
None of that would be possible without the hard work and tax dollars from the private sector.
Both of those things you listed were built by tax payer dollars and private companies contracted to the gov't.
The private sector craves modern industrial infrastructure and a legal system to protect their property and enforce their contracts and [things like] FDIC insurance to protect their risk. The private sector lives off subsidies and bailouts. Profit makers crave government help, that's why the USA has built the largest lobbying system in the world.
Still... none of it possible without the private sector... all of that takes lots and lots of money.
Where does that money come from?
You seem to be making a point around which there is very little controversy, namely that a successful economy must find a way to channel rather than block selfishness.
Nobody is arguing for socialism. You've been captured by a talk radio straw man. We're trying to figure out how to build the Hoover Dam when no single market actor can afford to do it. We're trying to appraise the value of the government investment in commercial aviation and computer technology - and the level which capital depends on the modern industrial state, supplied by the public, made possible by taxation. Also your rant doesn't draw distinctions between the distributive economy of Denmark - where people are free, happy and well educated - and China, the unfree place with whom the glorious American private sector does the most business.
You can not tell me Obama and his fellow travelers are not pushing socialism... if you try to, you are being dishonest.
History proves his policies a failure.... Bush was nearly as bad as Obama, and that in itself proves those liberal policies a failure.
Lets actually give conservatism a chance, because we have yet to do so...
Capitalism is heavily dependent on these freedom hating nations for labor and raw material. WalMart and the American retail sector would not exist without communist China. Capitalism despises freedom. A free middle class brings terribly high labor costs, and they tend to impose a higher regulatory burden because they don't want corporations polluting their water. Investment Capital thrives in freedom hating parts of the world. Do you know how much higher the returns are with sweatshop labor.
We would not have to go abroad if our tax strucuture wasnt so tyranical....
Frank, your essential premise about incentivizing productivity by letting people realize the highest possible returns on their efforts is not a new idea. We all understand that if you pay people not to work, they won't work. You haven't addressed any of the complicated stuff though. The NYC Subway system and the ******* Brooklyn Bridge was made possible by [things like] government
and taxation - by private/public partnerships. Your rant doesn't draw any distinctions. It sounds well-meaning but extremely un-educated. You can do better. You have done better.