Mike Johnson gets shredded on the house floor

[22lcidw]

The January 6th Committee is not the DoJ and played no part in the prosecution of any protestors.

The congressional committee has nothing to do with the justice system.

Progs stole the election.

 

[pknopp]

But when they get caught doing it...the judge in the trial will often declare a mistrial as punishment...or even overturn a verdict. That will sometimes let possibly guilty defendants off the hook but the judge sees that as the result of prosecutorial misconduct...violating one of the tenets of our Justice System.

And those who do it aren't held accountable. That's why it continues to happen.

 

[Blisterfinger]

What criminals?

The ones that broke the law when they deleted and withheld evidence.

 

[Crepitus]

The ones that broke the law when they deleted and withheld evidence.

Well that never happened.

 

[Blisterfinger]

Well that never happened.

Sure it did

House Jan. 6 Committee deleted more than 100 encrypted files days before GOP took majority: sources

EXCLUSIVE: The former House Select Committee on Jan. 6 deleted more than 100 files it was required to turn over to the new GOP-led panel investigating “what really happened" during their months-long probe and the Capitol riot, Fox News Digital has learned.

www.foxnews.com

 

[Crepitus]

Sure it did

House Jan. 6 Committee deleted more than 100 encrypted files days before GOP took majority: sources

EXCLUSIVE: The former House Select Committee on Jan. 6 deleted more than 100 files it was required to turn over to the new GOP-led panel investigating “what really happened" during their months-long probe and the Capitol riot, Fox News Digital has learned.

www.foxnews.com

How do you know those were evidence of anything one way or the other?

 

[Man With A Plan]

How do you know those were evidence of anything one way or the other?

When someone destroys evidence it can be surmised that the evidence was of a crime they are attempting to hide. It's called "the theory of spoliation inference".

 

[Blisterfinger]

How do you know those were evidence of anything one way or the other?

It was illegally deleted. How can anyone know anything about it?

 

[Crepitus]

When someone destroys evidence it can be surmised that the evidence was of a crime they are attempting to hide. It's called "the theory of spoliation inference".

So you're guessing.

Dismissed.

 

[Marener]

When someone destroys evidence it can be surmised that the evidence was of a crime they are attempting to hide. It's called "the theory of spoliation inference".

Like when Trump told his employees to delete the security footage at Mar a Lago?

 

[Blisterfinger]

Like when Trump told his employees to delete the security footage at Mar a Lago?

So you're okay with the January 6th committee withholding and deleting evidence. Got it

 

[Man With A Plan]

Like when Trump told his employees to delete the security footage at Mar a Lago?

Exactly like that. Deleting security footage allows the prosecution to claim it was deleted to hide something. It's wrong if a defendant does it but it's REALLY wrong if the Government does it!

 

[Blisterfinger]

So you're guessing.

Dismissed.

Seems like he had a well thought out, legal answer to your question. You are okay with criminals as long as they come from your side.

 

[Man With A Plan]

So you're guessing.

Dismissed.

It's not guessing, Crepitus...it's surmising that what was destroyed was destroyed to hide criminal activity.

 

[Blisterfinger]

It's not guessing, Crepitus...it's surmising that what was destroyed was destroyed to hide criminal activity.

Anything that crappy boy doesn't like is guessing...

 

[Man With A Plan]

Anything that crappy boy doesn't like is guessing...

I don't think either Crepitus or Marener know much about the law to be honest.

 

[Marener]

Exactly like that. Deleting security footage allows the prosecution to claim it was deleted to hide something. It's wrong if a defendant does it but it's REALLY wrong if the Government does it!

Okay. Glad you can admit that Trump is a criminal.

 

[Marener]

So you're okay with the January 6th committee withholding and deleting evidence. Got it

You’re okay with Trump trying to destroy evidence.

Actual evidence. Not make believe evidence.

 

[Man With A Plan]

Okay. Glad you can admit that Trump is a criminal.

The act of deleting the tapes isn't in and of itself "criminal", Marener! It simply makes it allowable for opposition council to assume what was on the tapes showed without actually having them to prove that contention.

 

[Marener]

The act of deleting the tapes isn't in and of itself "criminal", Marener! It simply makes it allowable for opposition council to assume what was on the tapes showed without actually having them to prove that contention.

It is illegal when those tapes are evidence on an ongoing active investigation.

You’re really dumb. Don’t give legal advice.