Michigan Election Official: ‘No Reason to Believe Large Numbers of Votes Will Be Found’

Vigilante

Diamond Member
Mar 9, 2014
51,327
18,072
2,290
Waiting on the Cowardly Dante!!
“There’s no reason to believe there will be large numbers of votes that will be found subsequent to the current reporting,” Michigan Secretary of State spokesperson Fred Woodhams tells Breitbart News.

The Michigan Secretary of State’s official election results website shows Donald Trump with a 13,107 vote lead over Hillary Clinton, with 100 percent of precincts reporting.

Republican– Trump, Donald J. – 2,277,914 votes (47.60%),

Democratic– Clinton, Hillary – 2,264,807 votes (47.33%),

Libertarian- Johnson, Gary – 172,726 votes( 3.61%),

US Taxpayers – Castle, Darrell – 16,125 votes (0.34%),

Green – Stein, Jill – 51,420 votes (1.07%),

Natural Law– Soltysik, Emidio – 2,231 votes (0.05%),

Total Votes: 4,785,223

“In Michigan we have county boards of canvassers. They’re now doing their canvassing process,” Woodhams says. “Typically this process results in small vote shifts. That’s common to every election.”

“13,000 is a huge count of votes to change,” Woodhams notes.

Woodhams would not speculate as to why media outlets have not yet called Michigan for Trump. “You would have to ask the media outlets that question.”

Similarly, Woodhams could not explain why Politico is currently reporting a few thousand more votes in the state than the Michigan Secretary of State website is reporting, with a slightly different margin for Trump (11,423 versus 13,107).

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
 
It really doesn't matter if large numbers of votes were found. The Electoral College numbers decide who will be president, not popularity. Once your candidate hits that magical number of 270, he or she has won.
 

Forum List

Back
Top