Michael's World

Hobbit

Senior Member
Mar 25, 2004
5,099
423
48
Near Atlanta, GA
I have here today's (May 24) edition of BreakPoint, a quick column/radio spot discussing news from a Christian perspective. I get it by e-mail, so no link, though I'm sure it's out there somewhere. The writer/speaker is Charles Coleson, one of the bigwigs from the Nixon administration that went to jail, where he found God and later started a prison minstry.

Chuck Coleson said:
Michael's World
A Dangerous Place to Be

May 24, 2006

Michael Schiavo has published a book titled Terri: The Truth. It is about his well-known and, unfortunately, successful fight to end his wife's life. Opening this book is like falling down Alice's rabbit hole and ending up in a new and bizarre world.

You don't even have to turn to the first page—just look at the front cover, where Michael proclaims, "My two babies were threatened with death. I was condemned by the president, the majority leaders of the House and Senate, the governor of Florida, the pope, and the right-wing media. . . . I didn't respond to their attacks. I didn't confront their lies. Until now."

Well, a quick Internet search turns up page after page of Michael's vigorous responses on Nightline, Larry King Live, and other venues, most of it very confrontational.

Why would he respond now? Books sales and talk shows are a lucrative business.

This turns out to be typical of the way things work in Michael Schiavo's world. As readers of the book soon discover, Schiavo's opponents deserve all the venom he can spew on them. To Michael Schiavo's mind, nobody could possibly have a good reason for wanting to let Terri Schiavo live in her condition. So he paints his opponents as biased, liars, downright insane. Just as the book cover indicates, the pope, the president, the governor of Florida, Terri's family, and several cranks who sent Michael death threats—which, by the way, I know from experience happens in these kinds of cases—are all lumped into the same category: people who opposed Michael's noble crusade to kill his wife. Noble? Or was he after collecting the insurance money and marrying the woman he was living with? Michael Schiavo's world, if you believe his book, is like the old Westerns where the good guys wore white hats and the bad guys all wore black hats and twisted their mustaches a lot.

Joking aside, Michael Schiavo's world is a dangerous and scary place, a place where the "survival of the fittest" is taken to a whole new level—a place where a badly brain-damaged woman should have her food and water taken away simply because she is badly brain damaged and her husband says she would not want to live that way. It's a place where it's easy for even a registered nurse like Michael Schiavo to confuse food, which everyone needs, with the kind of life support, like a respirator, which his wife did not need. It's a place where, as Schiavo is accustomed to saying with a straight face, taking someone's food away is not starving her to death; it's simply allowing her to die peacefully and painlessly. (Why a hospice needs to administer morphine to a person dying painlessly is something that Schiavo does not bother to explain, like so many other issues.)

The scariest thing about Michael Schiavo's world is that he, and so many of his partisans in the media and the public, do not want to give the benefit of the doubt to a comatose person. Now, I admit that many people today think well of Michael and less of those of us who defended Terri Schiavo since the autopsy showed that she had been brain-dead when she was in a comatose state. But that's beside the point. Our concern was with safeguarding the process and giving her the benefit of the doubt. After all, you can't do an autopsy until the person is dead, and then it is too late to correct mistakes.

Reading Schiavo's book is a sobering reminder that we must never give up our fight to guard the rights of the weak and the voiceless, or one day we will all be living—and dying—in Michael Schiavo's world.
 
Hobbit said:
I have here today's (May 24) edition of BreakPoint, a quick column/radio spot discussing news from a Christian perspective. I get it by e-mail, so no link, though I'm sure it's out there somewhere. The writer/speaker is Charles Coleson, one of the bigwigs from the Nixon administration that went to jail, where he found God and later started a prison minstry.

Sometimes death is better than life. As for this case, I can't really comment because I didn't know Terry Schiavo's wishes (and of course they were somehow distorted when the husband argued with her family). But for people who make it clear that they'd rather die than live in a comatose state or any other state that involves suffering, I think it's our duty to comply with their demands. People like Jack Kavorkian (spelling?) should not be imprisoned. Euthanasia is humane.

When final wishes are shrouded in mystery (as was the case in the Terry Schiavo situation), we should not let her die until we can conclusively prove that that was what she would've wanted. For some reason, I felt like there was another motive that the husband wouldn't share with us.
 
liberalogic said:
Sometimes death is better than life. As for this case, I can't really comment because I didn't know Terry Schiavo's wishes (and of course they were somehow distorted when the husband argued with her family). But for people who make it clear that they'd rather die than live in a comatose state or any other state that involves suffering, I think it's our duty to comply with their demands. People like Jack Kavorkian (spelling?) should not be imprisoned. Euthanasia is humane.

When final wishes are shrouded in mystery (as was the case in the Terry Schiavo situation), we should not let her die until we can conclusively prove that that was what she would've wanted. For some reason, I felt like there was another motive that the husband wouldn't share with us.

Me agreeing with you (mostly)? Is this the Twilight Zone or something? Now, I'm against euthenasia, but I can agree to disagree, except about Kavorkian. Even if you agree with euthenasia, when he did it, it wasn't the patient's choise, it was his.

Everything else in there was spot on. If she really did want to die, then so be it. I can accept that. However, the issue didn't come up until Shiavo met a pro-euthenasia lawyer, who he spent much of his wife's health care lawsuit money on. And the family disbelieved him. They even offered to take her off his hands and pay for the whole thing, but he didn't so much as let an independant doctor look at her until after she was dead. Something still smells fishy.
 

Forum List

Back
Top