Michael Mann.. Deception and Misinformation
- Thread starter Billy_Bob
- Start date
Billy_Bob
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #42
Mann is stonewalling the demand for access to his email, data, code and sources. The court has already fined the little bastard for defying the order of the court to produce. Mann has tried to withdraw from the suit (admission he has lost) but the court is now taking it all the way and he must defend his accusations.. Mann is in a pile of shit over his head now.. It would not surprise me if Styne demands a summary judgment for him as the plaintiff has defied the courts orders. As Styne has separated himself from the NRO suit, things are about to get very interesting..
Last edited:
PK1
Gold Member
- Jun 26, 2015
- 3,912
- 534
- 140
---
Your criticism of the scientific consensus is interesting, in light of the worldwide blind acceptance of religious beliefs, as propagated by myths in the Torah, Bible, Quran, etc.
If you are evidence oriented and skeptical, you must also be an atheist (or strong agnostic) and agree with your previous statement with corresponding substitutions:
The BULL SHIT IS GETTING REAL DEEP IN HERE.. How many times must we show you that Abrahamic religious texts are a FABRICATION OF THE WORST KIND?
.
Last edited:
Old Rocks
Diamond Member
Now Silly Billy, given your claim of multiple degree, and evidence from your posts that you really haven't even passed a GED, claiming someone else is engaged in fabrication is pretty foolish on your part.
flacaltenn
Diamond Member
Never said he LOST IT -- I said he abandoned the discovery phase by not providing the REQUESTED data to the defense. And then he hid behind the protection that he doesn't have to do ANYTHING until the 2ndary Slapp suites are resolved.. If he was in a hurry to PREVAIL -- that case would be ready to continue whenever the idiot DC judges got off their duffs about their ridiculous SLAPP law.
So -- he's obviously NOT gonna provide discovery data -- will extend this out or ABANDON the case -- because he's UNWILLING to show his work. In addition HE KNOWS he's opened the wrong can of whoopass because defense will likely call "expert witnesses" to review the claims. Thus REVEALING all of the malarkey and astronomically INFLATED claims that he and others made for that work..
Old Rocks
Diamond Member
Hockey Stick Scores Another Point in Climate Study: Op-Ed
![ExpertVoices_02_LS_v2[2].jpg](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fi.livescience.com%2Fimages%2Fi%2Fseries%2F5%2Foriginal%2FExpertVoices_02_LS_v2%5B2%5D.jpg%3F1362601053&hash=7186bce4b5486ab7fea8837d6f9eae74)
The National Hockey League playoffs are right around the corner, and the first round could feature some big rivalry matchups, like a New York/Boston series, and a Canadian battle between Montreal and Toronto. But, an arguably bigger rivalry has just been settled: climate "skeptics" versus "the hockey stick."
In 1999, climate scientists Michael Mann, Raymond Bradley and Malcolm Hughes published one of the first studies reconstructing northern hemisphere temperatures over the past 1,000 years. They found that temperatures had been relatively flat, but slightly cooling over the past millennium up until the 20th century, at which point there was a rapid global warming. Their temperature reconstruction graph had the shape of a stick and blade, and "the hockey stick" was born.
However, a string of subsequent studies by a number of scientific groups from around the world have all yielded essentially the same result. Most recently, a paper published in the journal Nature Geoscience this week — co-authored by 78 experts from 60 scientific institutions from around the world — found yet another hockey stick. Their temperature reconstruction shows a slow slide into a future ice age ending abruptly with a sharp rise in temperatures in the 19th and 20th centuries. Recent global surface temperatures are probably the warmest in the past 1,400 years.
The study is the product of an international collaboration by the PAGES(Past Global Changes) scientific network, which supports research aimed at understanding the Earth's past environment in order to make predictions for the future. In 2006, scientists in the PAGES network decided to organize an initiative to reconstruct the climate of the last 2,000 years, which they called The PAGES 2k Network.
Scientists from regions around the world each contributed their expertise on past, local climate change. This expertise is based on a solid understanding of historical records and natural measurements such as tree-ring widths and ice cores. The result is a global surface temperature reconstruction based on 511 records in seven continent-scale regions, representing the best available data for each region.
Given the number of confirming studies, are the dingleberries going to go after the data of every one of them?
[TABLE="width: 1px, border-spacing: 0px"][TBODY][TR][TD]
[/TD][/TR]
[TR][TD]
Extreme weather such as heat waves, heavy downpours and droughts are expected to accompanying climate change. Recent research indicates this has begun happening.
Anne-Marie Blackburn, an expert on environmental policy, and Dana Nuccitelli, an environmental scientist at a private environmental consulting firm in the Sacramento, Calif., area, are contributors toSkeptical Science. They contributed this article to LiveScience's Expert Voices: Op-Ed & Insights.
[TR][TD]
Credit: DreamstimeView full size image
[/TD][/TR][/TBODY][/TABLE]The National Hockey League playoffs are right around the corner, and the first round could feature some big rivalry matchups, like a New York/Boston series, and a Canadian battle between Montreal and Toronto. But, an arguably bigger rivalry has just been settled: climate "skeptics" versus "the hockey stick."
In 1999, climate scientists Michael Mann, Raymond Bradley and Malcolm Hughes published one of the first studies reconstructing northern hemisphere temperatures over the past 1,000 years. They found that temperatures had been relatively flat, but slightly cooling over the past millennium up until the 20th century, at which point there was a rapid global warming. Their temperature reconstruction graph had the shape of a stick and blade, and "the hockey stick" was born.
Ever since, the hockey stick model has been one of the main targets of climate skeptics. After all, if the current global warming is unprecedented in the past 1,000 years, that would signal the need to do something to reverse it. The scientists involved have been under constant attack, as Mann documented in his book "The Hockey Stick and the Climate Wars."
The study is the product of an international collaboration by the PAGES(Past Global Changes) scientific network, which supports research aimed at understanding the Earth's past environment in order to make predictions for the future. In 2006, scientists in the PAGES network decided to organize an initiative to reconstruct the climate of the last 2,000 years, which they called The PAGES 2k Network.
Scientists from regions around the world each contributed their expertise on past, local climate change. This expertise is based on a solid understanding of historical records and natural measurements such as tree-ring widths and ice cores. The result is a global surface temperature reconstruction based on 511 records in seven continent-scale regions, representing the best available data for each region.
Given the number of confirming studies, are the dingleberries going to go after the data of every one of them?
Similar threads
