you need to re-read Mueller's authorization. He's not charged with prosecuting Trump. He was charged with uncovering any "links or coordination" between Trump and the Ruskies.
https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/967231/download
After that, he is empowered to prosecute ... or not.
I don't see a distinction. Part of "prosecution" is investigation. The goal of an investigation is to seek justice. The goal should not be to convict or get rid of Trump.
We can thank Ken Starr for this bullshit. Nobody stood up to him when he went after Bill Clinton with the singular goal of getting him removed, rather than seeking justice.
Mueller was charged with uncovering any, and hopefully all, of Trump and Russia's coordination.
I agree that Starr sort of run amuck, or allowed Paula Jones to run him amuck. (-: Starr found jack shit of illegalities in White Water. I never understood the line of gop thinking since the Clintons appeared to have lost money on the thing. LOL Although as we later learned, Hillary could find money selling a corpse. LOL Starr should have tur
you need to re-read Mueller's authorization. He's not charged with prosecuting Trump. He was charged with uncovering any "links or coordination" between Trump and the Ruskies.
https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/967231/download
After that, he is empowered to prosecute ... or not.
I don't see a distinction. Part of "prosecution" is investigation. The goal of an investigation is to seek justice. The goal should not be to convict or get rid of Trump.
We can thank Ken Starr for this bullshit. Nobody stood up to him when he went after Bill Clinton with the singular goal of getting him removed, rather than seeking justice.
Well the Trumpbots call is "Mueller hasn't charged anything, so this should end now," but as you say, charging Trump is not the objective, but if facts lead to that, it's Mueller's duty to either file charges himself or refer possible charges to Congress.
I think in the end, he'll just say "X facts, if taken as true by a jury/congress, could support a conviction of Y"