Mexican is a nationality, not a race.

[NightFox]

And that is why Trump's claim that Curiel is biased is absolute bullshit. Curiel is an American. He was born in Indiana. He's lived in this country his entire life. He's American. He's not Mexican. Therefore, it is impossible for him to be biased by Trump's wall building rhetoric.

Thank you drumpfodder for clearing this up.

He supports LaRaza, which exists to help illegal aliens, like the judge's parents. As a judge, he should not be allowed to support breaking our laws.

Er., wrong La Raza.... Curiel belongs to the La Raza San Diego Lawyers Association, the La Raza you're referring to is the National Council of La Raza, the two groups aren't affiliated with one another.

 

[Correll]

So, that is a yes.

SO, now what do you believe about Trump's right to get a Fair and Impartial Trial?

Is it less or more important then the Right of the Hard Left to go on a fishing expedition to get more information to smear Trump with?

Trump shot himself in the foot so far as a fair trial goes. Calling out the judge can be seen as contempt.

And if Trump's "university" had not bilked so many people out of so much money, there would be no need for a trial. "Fishing expedition"? Let's call an indictment an indictment.

So, you don't support Trump's right to a Fair and Impartial Trial?

It is shocking to see you admit that so clearly.

I guess things are changing. Used to be lefties would lie about that.

Trump pointing out that the Judge is biased in not Contempt, it is completely valid.

Your opinion on the case is not very credible, now that you have admitted that you don't care about Trump receiving a Fair Trial.

May I ask what rationalization you use for giving up on Equal Rights for everyone?

Copious amount of willful misrepresentation.
Trump is receiving a fair trial dispite dump's best efforts to play the race card.
As to rationalizing that's all you slapdick, as it always is.

No, he was quite clear that he agrees that Hispanics hate Trump but that he doesn't want Trump to get a Fair Trial, he just wants Trump to lose.

Trump was only playing the Race Card if you can show that he was knowingly making a false accusation.

And fuck you.

No. I said Trump shot himself in the foot. When a defendant calls out a judge prior to the start of a trial, he is either maneuvering for a mistrial or committing a breach of contempt of court.

I hope Trump gets a fair trial as every defendant should. But Trump is not making that possibility easy on himself.

Pride goeth before the fall.

You seemed to agree that "Hispanics hate Trump", but didn't care.

That all existed BEFORE Trump said anything, and you dismissed it without comment.

The only way I could read that was that you saw the issue, but didn't care.

How does that square with your claim that you DO suddenly care about Trump getting a Fair Trial?

 

[Grizz]

And that is why Trump's claim that Curiel is biased is absolute bullshit. Curiel is an American. He was born in Indiana. He's lived in this country his entire life. He's American. He's not Mexican. Therefore, it is impossible for him to be biased by Trump's wall building rhetoric.

Thank you drumpfodder for clearing this up.

"Therefore, it is impossible for him to be biased by Trump's wall building rhetoric."

Patently stupid.

Why?

Being "biased" has NOTHING to do with one's Nationality.

So racists are not biased?

How do you arrive here from this.....

"Being "biased" has NOTHING to do with one's Nationality."

I'll gladly answer your question when you answer this.

 

[Correll]

Let it go?

You don't think you're going to hear Paul Ryan over and over in Democratic campaign commercials saying that what Trump did was textbook racism?

Good luck with that dream.

Agreed.

Lefties will NEVER let the Race Card go.

It is pretty much all they got.

Other than a little CLass Envy and of course the Gender Card.

So there's no such as racism?

A lot of libs complain that I put words in their mouths.

And moments like this are why.

Your question makes ABSOLUTELY NO SENSE, in relation to my post.


As I try to understand WTF you meant, I am forced to start trying to guess what bizarre meaning you are assigning my words that would give rise to your question.

BUT, I know what happens then.

You deny that that is what you meant and we spend the next 20 pages arguing stupid sematics.

So, please explain the reasoning, very slowing and clearly, that led you from me agreeing with you that "we would see Ryan's accusation of textbook racism" to


"So there's no such as racism?"

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

And that is why Trump's claim that Curiel is biased is absolute bullshit. Curiel is an American. He was born in Indiana. He's lived in this country his entire life. He's American. He's not Mexican. Therefore, it is impossible for him to be biased by Trump's wall building rhetoric.

Thank you drumpfodder for clearing this up.

Impossible to be biased if you were born in the USA? is that what you are claiming? How about Sharpton, Jackson, Farrakhan, and Whoopi? Are they not biased?

BTW, Mexican is not a race, neither is muslim, or African, or Irish, or arab.

I'm saying that being Mexican is not a race, so Trump is not being racist when he wants to build a wall. Since Mexican is a nationality, nothing about Curiel can be Mexican. He is an American citizen, born in the United States to American citizens. If we reject any connection between anti-Mexican rhetoric and racism, we must also reject any connection between Curiel's ancestry and an imagined expectation that he will be biased against Trump because of that same rhetoric.

Then let us correct the language immediately! Trump is not a racist in this context. He is Anti-Latino.

For the record, he is also anti-POW, anti-Chinese, anti-Woman, anti-Black and anti-Intellectual.

Now, piling up all those things Trump is 'anti', can we imagine he is trying to use his big mouth to sway justice in his favor and failing spectacularly?

Rapists, murderers, drug dealers. Some of them, I assume, are good people.



Do you believe that Hispanics hate Trump?

"Rapists, murderers, drug dealers. I assume some of them are good people". What's not to like about Trump after he says something like that?

Nothing.

 

[Correll]

The vast majority of Hispanics oppose Trump. Correll agrees.

"THIS particular judge is [NOT] a member of a Hispanic organization that strongly opposes Trump on the issues, and slanders him in very strong language." Correll has the organizations confused.

"AND there has been a pattern of dem appointed judges releasing information from sealed court cases to provide potentially damaging information to dems" is merely an allegation and with no link to Curiel.

These are not assumptions that Correll continues to play the "hispanic" card without evidence.

Curiel is a dem appointed judge. As I said.

That is the link.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

And that is why Trump's claim that Curiel is biased is absolute bullshit. Curiel is an American. He was born in Indiana. He's lived in this country his entire life. He's American. He's not Mexican. Therefore, it is impossible for him to be biased by Trump's wall building rhetoric.

Thank you drumpfodder for clearing this up.

Fail.

That Trump believes a jurist cannot be impartial because of his race, religion, or national origin in fact renders Trump a racist and bigot – racism, bigotry, fear of those different, and seeking to disadvantage those perceived to be different through force of law is ignorant, hateful, and repugnant to the most fundamental tenets of our Nation.

A game of inane semantics in no way mitigates Trump’s bigotry, racism, and hate.

 

[NightFox]

The vast majority of Hispanics oppose Trump. Correll agrees.

"THIS particular judge is [NOT] a member of a Hispanic organization that strongly opposes Trump on the issues, and slanders him in very strong language." Correll has the organizations confused.

"AND there has been a pattern of dem appointed judges releasing information from sealed court cases to provide potentially damaging information to dems" is merely an allegation and with no link to Curiel.

These are not assumptions that Correll continues to play the "hispanic" card without evidence.

Curiel is a dem appointed judge. As I said.

That is the link.

Er.. he was first appointed to the bench by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger (California State Superior Court), who,was and last time I checked, is a Republican.

 

[LeftofLeft]

And that is why Trump's claim that Curiel is biased is absolute bullshit. Curiel is an American. He was born in Indiana. He's lived in this country his entire life. He's American. He's not Mexican. Therefore, it is impossible for him to be biased by Trump's wall building rhetoric.
.

Not impossible, just not likely based on the facts available, he is of Mexican descent and there is precedent for Americans of XYZ nationality descent harboring sympathies for the country of their ancestors origin.

In any case, it appears that even Trump has given up on this idiotic crusade so you probably should too.

My German and Italian Grandfathers put on a US Army uniform in 1942 to go stop what Germany and Italy were trying to do to US. Some Mexicans in the US get and respect that the US has immigration and border protection laws that need to be respected just as Mexico has laws and a southern border that it is trying to protect. Cutting to the chase, the reality is that Mexico is a corrupt failure of a nation that is simply trying to export its poverty to US. Rhetoric are the Mexicans here in the US who put Mexico above this country and scoff at the notion of the US enforcing its border protection laws.

The only idiotic crusade is the one where Mexico cries about human rights when it comes to US enforcing our borders. Take a look and review at how they treat illegals coming into their country; better yet, see the Mexican criteria in order to stay there permanently.

 

[Nosmo King]

Trump shot himself in the foot so far as a fair trial goes. Calling out the judge can be seen as contempt.

And if Trump's "university" had not bilked so many people out of so much money, there would be no need for a trial. "Fishing expedition"? Let's call an indictment an indictment.

So, you don't support Trump's right to a Fair and Impartial Trial?

It is shocking to see you admit that so clearly.

I guess things are changing. Used to be lefties would lie about that.

Trump pointing out that the Judge is biased in not Contempt, it is completely valid.

Your opinion on the case is not very credible, now that you have admitted that you don't care about Trump receiving a Fair Trial.

May I ask what rationalization you use for giving up on Equal Rights for everyone?

Copious amount of willful misrepresentation.
Trump is receiving a fair trial dispite dump's best efforts to play the race card.
As to rationalizing that's all you slapdick, as it always is.

No, he was quite clear that he agrees that Hispanics hate Trump but that he doesn't want Trump to get a Fair Trial, he just wants Trump to lose.

Trump was only playing the Race Card if you can show that he was knowingly making a false accusation.

And fuck you.

No. I said Trump shot himself in the foot. When a defendant calls out a judge prior to the start of a trial, he is either maneuvering for a mistrial or committing a breach of contempt of court.

I hope Trump gets a fair trial as every defendant should. But Trump is not making that possibility easy on himself.

Pride goeth before the fall.

You seemed to agree that "Hispanics hate Trump", but didn't care.

That all existed BEFORE Trump said anything, and you dismissed it without comment.

The only way I could read that was that you saw the issue, but didn't care.

How does that square with your claim that you DO suddenly care about Trump getting a Fair Trial?

Let's walk it through slowly. Trump hates Latinos. e.g. "Murderers, rapists, drug dealers. I assume some of them are good people". Hardly a ringing endorsement of the Latino community.

Trump calls out an American Latino judge and claims that he cannot find justice in his court. Now, that is either a maneuver for a mis-trial OR contempt of court, six to five and pick 'em, it's Trump's ham handed attempt at blowing the anti-Latino dog whistle for his supporters.

I have ALWAYS advocated fairness in our judicial system. I may be naïve, but that statue of justice blindfolded actually indicates to me there will be a fair trial. Trump's statements are making that possibility harder for him. Yet Trump makes such outlandish statements because, here to fore, no one has called him on it. The Emperor has no clothes.

 

[daws101]

Copious amount of willful misrepresentation.
Trump is receiving a fair trial dispite dump's best efforts to play the race card.
As to rationalizing that's all you slapdick, as it always is.

No, he was quite clear that he agrees that Hispanics hate Trump but that he doesn't want Trump to get a Fair Trial, he just wants Trump to lose.

Trump was only playing the Race Card if you can show that he was knowingly making a false accusation.

And fuck you.

No need, dump has done that multiple times!
You could quit now and save yourself from much deserved humiliation but you won't
I think you enjoy being gang banged!

Trump has done WHAT multiple times?

I pointed out that you need to show that Trump was knowingly making a false accusation of Racism, if you want to claim he was playing the "Race Card". Was there a response to that in your vague post?

Do you think Trump has a right to a Fair and Impartial Trial?

Here Are 10 Examples Of Donald Trump Being Racist

If you were smart you'd stfu now but you won't.

The topic is Trump's accusation against the Judge.

To support your claim that is was a Race Card play, you have to show that he knowingly made a false accusation of racism against the Judge.


Otherwise, your position is nonsense.

This is the 11th piece evidence proving that dump knowingly and repeatedly made racist statements about the judge.

Paul Ryan rips Donald Trump remarks as 'textbook definition of racist comment' - CNNPolitics.com

On the other hand you being seriously deranged needs no evidence.

 

[daws101]

And that is why Trump's claim that Curiel is biased is absolute bullshit. Curiel is an American. He was born in Indiana. He's lived in this country his entire life. He's American. He's not Mexican. Therefore, it is impossible for him to be biased by Trump's wall building rhetoric.

Thank you drumpfodder for clearing this up.

"Therefore, it is impossible for him to be biased by Trump's wall building rhetoric."

Patently stupid.

Why?

Being "biased" has NOTHING to do with one's Nationality.

So racists are not biased?

How do you arrive here from this.....

"Being "biased" has NOTHING to do with one's Nationality."

I'll gladly answer your question when you answer this.

You first!

 

[Contumacious]

So, you don't support Trump's right to a Fair and Impartial Trial?

It is shocking to see you admit that so clearly.

I guess things are changing. Used to be lefties would lie about that.

Trump pointing out that the Judge is biased in not Contempt, it is completely valid.

Your opinion on the case is not very credible, now that you have admitted that you don't care about Trump receiving a Fair Trial.

May I ask what rationalization you use for giving up on Equal Rights for everyone?

Copious amount of willful misrepresentation.
Trump is receiving a fair trial dispite dump's best efforts to play the race card.
As to rationalizing that's all you slapdick, as it always is.

No, he was quite clear that he agrees that Hispanics hate Trump but that he doesn't want Trump to get a Fair Trial, he just wants Trump to lose.

Trump was only playing the Race Card if you can show that he was knowingly making a false accusation.

And fuck you.

No. I said Trump shot himself in the foot. When a defendant calls out a judge prior to the start of a trial, he is either maneuvering for a mistrial or committing a breach of contempt of court.

I hope Trump gets a fair trial as every defendant should. But Trump is not making that possibility easy on himself.

Pride goeth before the fall.

You seemed to agree that "Hispanics hate Trump", but didn't care.

That all existed BEFORE Trump said anything, and you dismissed it without comment.

The only way I could read that was that you saw the issue, but didn't care.

How does that square with your claim that you DO suddenly care about Trump getting a Fair Trial?

Let's walk it through slowly. Trump hates Latinos. e.g. "Murderers, rapists, drug dealers. I assume some of them are good people". Hardly a ringing endorsement of the Latino community.

Trump calls out an American Latino judge and claims that he cannot find justice in his court. Now, that is either a maneuver for a mis-trial OR contempt of court, six to five and pick 'em, it's Trump's ham handed attempt at blowing the anti-Latino dog whistle for his supporters.

I have ALWAYS advocated fairness in our judicial system. I may be naïve, but that statue of justice blindfolded actually indicates to me there will be a fair trial. Trump's statements are making that possibility harder for him. Yet Trump makes such outlandish statements because, here to fore, no one has called him on it. The Emperor has no clothes.

The dingle berries never cease to amaze me.


Justice Marshall Opposes Hearing Drug Dealer and Incest Appeals

 

[daws101]

Copious amount of willful misrepresentation.
Trump is receiving a fair trial dispite dump's best efforts to play the race card.
As to rationalizing that's all you slapdick, as it always is.

No, he was quite clear that he agrees that Hispanics hate Trump but that he doesn't want Trump to get a Fair Trial, he just wants Trump to lose.

Trump was only playing the Race Card if you can show that he was knowingly making a false accusation.

And fuck you.

No. I said Trump shot himself in the foot. When a defendant calls out a judge prior to the start of a trial, he is either maneuvering for a mistrial or committing a breach of contempt of court.

I hope Trump gets a fair trial as every defendant should. But Trump is not making that possibility easy on himself.

Pride goeth before the fall.

You seemed to agree that "Hispanics hate Trump", but didn't care.

That all existed BEFORE Trump said anything, and you dismissed it without comment.

The only way I could read that was that you saw the issue, but didn't care.

How does that square with your claim that you DO suddenly care about Trump getting a Fair Trial?

Let's walk it through slowly. Trump hates Latinos. e.g. "Murderers, rapists, drug dealers. I assume some of them are good people". Hardly a ringing endorsement of the Latino community.

Trump calls out an American Latino judge and claims that he cannot find justice in his court. Now, that is either a maneuver for a mis-trial OR contempt of court, six to five and pick 'em, it's Trump's ham handed attempt at blowing the anti-Latino dog whistle for his supporters.

I have ALWAYS advocated fairness in our judicial system. I may be naïve, but that statue of justice blindfolded actually indicates to me there will be a fair trial. Trump's statements are making that possibility harder for him. Yet Trump makes such outlandish statements because, here to fore, no one has called him on it. The Emperor has no clothes.

The dingle berries never cease to amaze me.


Justice Marshall Opposes Hearing Drug Dealer and Incest Appeals

Off topic much?

 

[Contumacious]

No, he was quite clear that he agrees that Hispanics hate Trump but that he doesn't want Trump to get a Fair Trial, he just wants Trump to lose.

Trump was only playing the Race Card if you can show that he was knowingly making a false accusation.

And fuck you.

No. I said Trump shot himself in the foot. When a defendant calls out a judge prior to the start of a trial, he is either maneuvering for a mistrial or committing a breach of contempt of court.

I hope Trump gets a fair trial as every defendant should. But Trump is not making that possibility easy on himself.

Pride goeth before the fall.

You seemed to agree that "Hispanics hate Trump", but didn't care.

That all existed BEFORE Trump said anything, and you dismissed it without comment.

The only way I could read that was that you saw the issue, but didn't care.

How does that square with your claim that you DO suddenly care about Trump getting a Fair Trial?

Let's walk it through slowly. Trump hates Latinos. e.g. "Murderers, rapists, drug dealers. I assume some of them are good people". Hardly a ringing endorsement of the Latino community.

Trump calls out an American Latino judge and claims that he cannot find justice in his court. Now, that is either a maneuver for a mis-trial OR contempt of court, six to five and pick 'em, it's Trump's ham handed attempt at blowing the anti-Latino dog whistle for his supporters.

I have ALWAYS advocated fairness in our judicial system. I may be naïve, but that statue of justice blindfolded actually indicates to me there will be a fair trial. Trump's statements are making that possibility harder for him. Yet Trump makes such outlandish statements because, here to fore, no one has called him on it. The Emperor has no clothes.

The dingle berries never cease to amaze me.


Justice Marshall Opposes Hearing Drug Dealer and Incest Appeals

Off topic much?

The dingle berries never cease to amaze me.

bi·ased
ˈbīəst/
adjective

1. unfairly prejudiced for or against someone or something.

Justice Marshall Opposes Hearing Drug Dealer and Incest Appeals

 

[Grizz]

"Therefore, it is impossible for him to be biased by Trump's wall building rhetoric."

Patently stupid.

Why?

Being "biased" has NOTHING to do with one's Nationality.

So racists are not biased?

How do you arrive here from this.....

"Being "biased" has NOTHING to do with one's Nationality."

I'll gladly answer your question when you answer this.

You first!

Of course Racism shows a bias. That has nothing to do with what I said though.

 

[Correll]

And that is why Trump's claim that Curiel is biased is absolute bullshit. Curiel is an American. He was born in Indiana. He's lived in this country his entire life. He's American. He's not Mexican. Therefore, it is impossible for him to be biased by Trump's wall building rhetoric.

Thank you drumpfodder for clearing this up.

Fail.

That Trump believes a jurist cannot be impartial because of his race, religion, or national origin in fact renders Trump a racist and bigot – racism, bigotry, fear of those different, and seeking to disadvantage those perceived to be different through force of law is ignorant, hateful, and repugnant to the most fundamental tenets of our Nation.

A game of inane semantics in no way mitigates Trump’s bigotry, racism, and hate.

We constantly hear the Left complaining about "all white juries" or pointing out that "white police officers" did something as though their motives are naturally suspect.

Is it racism when lefties do it, or just when righties do it?

 

[Correll]

So, you don't support Trump's right to a Fair and Impartial Trial?

It is shocking to see you admit that so clearly.

I guess things are changing. Used to be lefties would lie about that.

Trump pointing out that the Judge is biased in not Contempt, it is completely valid.

Your opinion on the case is not very credible, now that you have admitted that you don't care about Trump receiving a Fair Trial.

May I ask what rationalization you use for giving up on Equal Rights for everyone?

Copious amount of willful misrepresentation.
Trump is receiving a fair trial dispite dump's best efforts to play the race card.
As to rationalizing that's all you slapdick, as it always is.

No, he was quite clear that he agrees that Hispanics hate Trump but that he doesn't want Trump to get a Fair Trial, he just wants Trump to lose.

Trump was only playing the Race Card if you can show that he was knowingly making a false accusation.

And fuck you.

No. I said Trump shot himself in the foot. When a defendant calls out a judge prior to the start of a trial, he is either maneuvering for a mistrial or committing a breach of contempt of court.

I hope Trump gets a fair trial as every defendant should. But Trump is not making that possibility easy on himself.

Pride goeth before the fall.

You seemed to agree that "Hispanics hate Trump", but didn't care.

That all existed BEFORE Trump said anything, and you dismissed it without comment.

The only way I could read that was that you saw the issue, but didn't care.

How does that square with your claim that you DO suddenly care about Trump getting a Fair Trial?

Let's walk it through slowly. Trump hates Latinos. e.g. "Murderers, rapists, drug dealers. I assume some of them are good people". Hardly a ringing endorsement of the Latino community.

Trump calls out an American Latino judge and claims that he cannot find justice in his court. Now, that is either a maneuver for a mis-trial OR contempt of court, six to five and pick 'em, it's Trump's ham handed attempt at blowing the anti-Latino dog whistle for his supporters.

I have ALWAYS advocated fairness in our judicial system. I may be naïve, but that statue of justice blindfolded actually indicates to me there will be a fair trial. Trump's statements are making that possibility harder for him. Yet Trump makes such outlandish statements because, here to fore, no one has called him on it. The Emperor has no clothes.

1. Discussing the issues with Illegal immigration is not racist and is irrelevant to this topic.

2. Or it could be that Trump is right, that the Hispanic, "Mexican" judge is biased against him and is not giving him a fair trial.

3 Your pretense that that there is no possibility that the Judge could be unfair, undermines your claim to want a fair trial for Trump.

 

[Correll]

No, he was quite clear that he agrees that Hispanics hate Trump but that he doesn't want Trump to get a Fair Trial, he just wants Trump to lose.

Trump was only playing the Race Card if you can show that he was knowingly making a false accusation.

And fuck you.

No need, dump has done that multiple times!
You could quit now and save yourself from much deserved humiliation but you won't
I think you enjoy being gang banged!

Trump has done WHAT multiple times?

I pointed out that you need to show that Trump was knowingly making a false accusation of Racism, if you want to claim he was playing the "Race Card". Was there a response to that in your vague post?

Do you think Trump has a right to a Fair and Impartial Trial?

Here Are 10 Examples Of Donald Trump Being Racist

If you were smart you'd stfu now but you won't.

The topic is Trump's accusation against the Judge.

To support your claim that is was a Race Card play, you have to show that he knowingly made a false accusation of racism against the Judge.


Otherwise, your position is nonsense.

This is the 11th piece evidence proving that dump knowingly and repeatedly made racist statements about the judge.

Paul Ryan rips Donald Trump remarks as 'textbook definition of racist comment' - CNNPolitics.com

On the other hand you being seriously deranged needs no evidence.

You are failing to comprehend anything I write.


The topic is Trump's accusation against the Judge.

To support your claim that is was a Race Card play, you have to show that he knowingly made a false accusation of racism against the Judge.


Otherwise, your position is nonsense

 

[Nosmo King]

Copious amount of willful misrepresentation.
Trump is receiving a fair trial dispite dump's best efforts to play the race card.
As to rationalizing that's all you slapdick, as it always is.

No, he was quite clear that he agrees that Hispanics hate Trump but that he doesn't want Trump to get a Fair Trial, he just wants Trump to lose.

Trump was only playing the Race Card if you can show that he was knowingly making a false accusation.

And fuck you.

No. I said Trump shot himself in the foot. When a defendant calls out a judge prior to the start of a trial, he is either maneuvering for a mistrial or committing a breach of contempt of court.

I hope Trump gets a fair trial as every defendant should. But Trump is not making that possibility easy on himself.

Pride goeth before the fall.

You seemed to agree that "Hispanics hate Trump", but didn't care.

That all existed BEFORE Trump said anything, and you dismissed it without comment.

The only way I could read that was that you saw the issue, but didn't care.

How does that square with your claim that you DO suddenly care about Trump getting a Fair Trial?

Let's walk it through slowly. Trump hates Latinos. e.g. "Murderers, rapists, drug dealers. I assume some of them are good people". Hardly a ringing endorsement of the Latino community.

Trump calls out an American Latino judge and claims that he cannot find justice in his court. Now, that is either a maneuver for a mis-trial OR contempt of court, six to five and pick 'em, it's Trump's ham handed attempt at blowing the anti-Latino dog whistle for his supporters.

I have ALWAYS advocated fairness in our judicial system. I may be naïve, but that statue of justice blindfolded actually indicates to me there will be a fair trial. Trump's statements are making that possibility harder for him. Yet Trump makes such outlandish statements because, here to fore, no one has called him on it. The Emperor has no clothes.

1. Discussing the issues with Illegal immigration is not racist and is irrelevant to this topic.

2. Or it could be that Trump is right, that the Hispanic, "Mexican" judge is biased against him and is not giving him a fair trial.

3 Your pretense that that there is no possibility that the Judge could be unfair, undermines your claim to want a fair trial for Trump.

1. Trump's disdain for Latinos is the scaffold upon which this controversy rests

2. Trump should remain mute as far as his case goes. His comments, that's right, HIS comments jeopardizes his shot as a fair trial

3. I never said I hope Trump does not get a fair trial. I hope that every defendant gets a fair trial. But every defendant does not say things about the judge prior to the trial, do they?