What's new
US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

#MeTooBewitched

chops_

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2018
Messages
665
Reaction score
196
Points
145
salem_witch_trials_gi.jpg


The following is satirical.

Democrats in Salem, Massachusetts are declaring they believe the women who are accusing people of witchcraft there. The Salem uproar began in 1692 when a number of girls began complaining of being pinched and pricked by demons. The girls then began to utter strange sounds and to contort themselves into odd positions, after which many other girls joined in in a movement that is now being called #MeTooBewitched.

Under the slogan “Believe all hysterical people making unsubstantiated charges,” Salem Democrats are calling for... (Read the rest here.)

(This was taken from The Dailywire website.)
 

BlackFlag

Gold Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2014
Messages
21,292
Reaction score
1,850
Points
280
Location
America
In those times, a rapist and their defenders would claim the victim is a witch. They would demonize the victim, as is happening with Ford in the right wing echo chamber.
 
D

dave p

Guest
In those times, a rapist and their defenders would claim the victim is a witch. They would demonize the victim, as is happening with Ford in the right wing echo chamber.
She has demonized herself, she didn't need any help.
 
OP
chops_

chops_

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2018
Messages
665
Reaction score
196
Points
145
Haha...like who knew?

(Oh wait, she did...Lol)
 

SassyIrishLass

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2009
Messages
68,789
Reaction score
28,147
Points
2,290
In those times, a rapist and their defenders would claim the victim is a witch. They would demonize the victim, as is happening with Ford in the right wing echo chamber.
She has demonized herself, she didn't need any help.

She's one of those demoquacks you look at and listen to and know is a moon bat
 

BlackFlag

Gold Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2014
Messages
21,292
Reaction score
1,850
Points
280
Location
America
OP
chops_

chops_

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2018
Messages
665
Reaction score
196
Points
145
In those times, a rapist and their defenders would claim the victim is a witch. They would demonize the victim, as is happening with Ford in the right wing echo chamber.

Actually, Ford brought that on herself (of course, courtesy of Feinstein). So please explain to me how she is the "victim"?
 

BlackFlag

Gold Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2014
Messages
21,292
Reaction score
1,850
Points
280
Location
America
In those times, a rapist and their defenders would claim the victim is a witch. They would demonize the victim, as is happening with Ford in the right wing echo chamber.

Actually, Ford brought that on herself (of course, courtesy of Feinstein). So please explain to me how she is the "victim"?
Because someone tried to rape her and his supporters have chased her out of her home with threats to murder her family
 
OP
chops_

chops_

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2018
Messages
665
Reaction score
196
Points
145
In those times, a rapist and their defenders would claim the victim is a witch. They would demonize the victim, as is happening with Ford in the right wing echo chamber.

Actually, Ford brought that on herself (of course, courtesy of Feinstein). So please explain to me how she is the "victim"?
Because someone tried to rape her and his supporters have chased her out of her home with threats to murder her family

No, she wasn't "raped". She even said that herself...go back and research it yourself. She said that "two guys were in the room and one of them hopped on her". She had clothes on the whole time. Yes, she even said that herself.
Secondlly, how was she going to remember what exactly happened thirty-six year? She is even having trouble remembering herself. And, again...she said that herself.

Quit abating the subject of her being raped. When in fact, she even said it herself that she wasn't.
 

WillHaftawaite

Diamond Member
Staff member
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2013
Messages
65,140
Reaction score
23,416
Points
2,250
In those times, a rapist and their defenders would claim the victim is a witch. They would demonize the victim, as is happening with Ford in the right wing echo chamber.

Sounds like the Clintons in the 90s
 
OP
chops_

chops_

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2018
Messages
665
Reaction score
196
Points
145
In those times, a rapist and their defenders would claim the victim is a witch. They would demonize the victim, as is happening with Ford in the right wing echo chamber.

Sounds like the Clintons in the 90s

It more sounds like a remake of the Anita Hill-Clarence Thomas debacle.
The only is that they were FEDERAL EMPLOYEES. Dr Christine Ford isn't. Just another "poster child" for the Democrats.
 

WillHaftawaite

Diamond Member
Staff member
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2013
Messages
65,140
Reaction score
23,416
Points
2,250
In those times, a rapist and their defenders would claim the victim is a witch. They would demonize the victim, as is happening with Ford in the right wing echo chamber.

Sounds like the Clintons in the 90s
I know, right? But now republicans are on Clinton’s side. It’s crazy.


Hardly

There was proof against Clinton, not so much against Kavanaugh.

(as he admitted as he walked out the back door of the WH)
 

BlackFlag

Gold Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2014
Messages
21,292
Reaction score
1,850
Points
280
Location
America
In those times, a rapist and their defenders would claim the victim is a witch. They would demonize the victim, as is happening with Ford in the right wing echo chamber.

Sounds like the Clintons in the 90s

It more sounds like a remake of the Anita Hill-Clarence Thomas debacle.
The only is that they were FEDERAL EMPLOYEES. Dr Christine Ford isn't. Just another "poster child" for the Democrats.
Ah Clarence, another probable rapist. And then he went on to not ask a single question in any SCOTUS case until 2016. The GOP doesn’t care if you’re a rapist, they just want a rubberstamp for their ideology.
 

WillHaftawaite

Diamond Member
Staff member
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2013
Messages
65,140
Reaction score
23,416
Points
2,250
In those times, a rapist and their defenders would claim the victim is a witch. They would demonize the victim, as is happening with Ford in the right wing echo chamber.

Sounds like the Clintons in the 90s

It more sounds like a remake of the Anita Hill-Clarence Thomas debacle.
The only is that they were FEDERAL EMPLOYEES. Dr Christine Ford isn't. Just another "poster child" for the Democrats.
Ah Clarence, another probable rapist. And then he went on to not ask a single question in any SCOTUS case until 2016. The GOP doesn’t care if you’re a rapist, they just want a rubberstamp for their ideology.

The GOP doesn’t care if you’re a rapist,


Odd, when it's a democrat, the democrats dont' have a problem with rapists
 

BlackFlag

Gold Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2014
Messages
21,292
Reaction score
1,850
Points
280
Location
America
In those times, a rapist and their defenders would claim the victim is a witch. They would demonize the victim, as is happening with Ford in the right wing echo chamber.

Sounds like the Clintons in the 90s
I know, right? But now republicans are on Clinton’s side. It’s crazy.


Hardly

There was proof against Clinton, not so much against Kavanaugh.

(as he admitted as he walked out the back door of the WH)
There was no proof against Clinton. If there was, he’d have been convicted.
 

WillHaftawaite

Diamond Member
Staff member
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2013
Messages
65,140
Reaction score
23,416
Points
2,250
In those times, a rapist and their defenders would claim the victim is a witch. They would demonize the victim, as is happening with Ford in the right wing echo chamber.

Sounds like the Clintons in the 90s
I know, right? But now republicans are on Clinton’s side. It’s crazy.


Hardly

There was proof against Clinton, not so much against Kavanaugh.

(as he admitted as he walked out the back door of the WH)
There was no proof against Clinton. If there was, he’d have been convicted.


He admitted it on his way out the door.

are you that partisan?
 

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top