Merrick Garland Let Trump Get Away With It. The Bad Guys Have Won.

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The word crime isn't in that article.

Why don't you just post it here?

"Somebody please read all the reporting to me again. Just like the last 30 times I engaged in this exact same sealioning."

Don't feed the sealions.

 

[dudmuck]

The word crime isn't in that article.

Why don't you just post it here?

you can search for the word law, and find where the word violation is nearby.
crime is a synonym for violation of law.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

It was all fake... does someone have yo kick you in the head to get you to understand that going after Trump with the law was a failed plan from the start?...
It cost your side an election and yet you keep it going?... fine have at it....

Magaturds love law breakers.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

What a bizarre thing to say, given what happened a week before the 2020 election.

You seem a bit detached from reality.

When was the last time that a Senate of one party confirmed a nominee of
the other party, during a presidential election year?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

you can search for the word law, and find where the word violation is nearby.
crime is a synonym for violation of law.

Why don't you just post it here?

 

[Nostra]

this is detailed here.

Nope. Not detailed in there.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

you can search for the word law, and find where the word violation is nearby.
crime is a synonym for violation of law.

Here is the only instance of law with violation nearby.

Trainor explained his views in more detail in an interview with the Washington Examiner, arguing, “It’s not a campaign finance violation. It’s not a reporting violation of any kind.” Trainor also asserted that “the Department of Justice in their investigation of the federal campaign finance issues and the Federal Election Commission in their ultimate jurisdiction over campaign finance issues, neither of them found there to be any violations whatsoever.” He further said of the FEC that it “didn’t find any violation of the law here.”

Is that what you intended?

 

[Nostra]

"Somebody please read all the reporting to me again. Just like the last 30 times I engaged in this exact same sealioning."

Don't feed the sealions.

The prosecution nor judge could specify an underlying crime. That's why the judge told the jury they could make up their own.

 

[Nostra]

Why don't you just post it here?

Because it doesn't exist.

 

[kyzr]

falsifying business records in New York can be a felony if the defendant intends to commit or conceal another crime.

This requires no conviction, but only evidence of that the crime. Turley's arguments fall apart on several levels.

LOL. So you type a great legal argument supported by no one.
Your mysterious crime being covered up is a non-crime, so says the FEC.

FEC drops investigation into Trump hush money payments

The Federal Elections Commission (FEC) has closed its investigation into whether former President Trump illegally made hush money payments to women prior to the 2016 election. The FEC vot…

thehill.com

FEC drops investigation into Trump hush money payments​

If there was a campaign finance crime the FEC would have pursued it, duh.

 

[0311]

Garland should have started his Jan 6 criminal investigations of Trump on 20 Jan 2021, as soon as Joe Biden entered office. Instead, Garland wasted over 2 years prosecuting all of the imbecile MAGA bumpkins who attacked the Capitol on Jan 6.

Garland would have done absolutely nothing to prosecute Trump if it had not been for the House Jan 6 Committee putting pressure on Garland during the summer of 2022.

History is going to crucify both Merrick Garland and Joe Biden for letting Trump get away with this. It is like Jefferson Davis being allowed to run for President in 1868, as if nothing had ever happened. Biden campaigned in 2020 and 2022 and 2024 talking about what a threat to democracy Trump was....and then did nothing about it.

Biden and Garland actually gave Trump legitimacy to run for president, by failing to take action immediately in 2021. President Bernie Sanders would have thrown Trump's ass in jail in 2021 or 2022 and permanently lost the key.

Don't take my word for it...listen to Elie Mystal on this podcast with Michael Steel, starting at about 49:20.

The bad guys have won. It's a very bitter pill to swallow.

I firmly and honestly believe that Garland was working for and with Trump the fucking time.

 

[Rambunctious]

Magaturds love law breakers.

What law was broken?... when you can answer that question I will listen... but until then forget trying to lie....

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

When was the last time that a Senate of one party confirmed a nominee of
the other party, during a presidential election year?

I'm not your assistant.

I'm mocking your fake rule that doesn't exist.

 

[dudmuck]

Here is the only instance of law with violation nearby.

Trainor explained his views in more detail in an interview with the Washington Examiner, arguing, “It’s not a campaign finance violation. It’s not a reporting violation of any kind.” Trainor also asserted that “the Department of Justice in their investigation of the federal campaign finance issues and the Federal Election Commission in their ultimate jurisdiction over campaign finance issues, neither of them found there to be any violations whatsoever.” He further said of the FEC that it “didn’t find any violation of the law here.”

Is that what you intended?

as detailed here, its a violation of campaign finance law. Michael Cohen went to jail for for it.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

as detailed here, its a violation of campaign finance law. Michael Cohen went to jail for for it.

This isn't going to work.

He has been told this many, many times.

He just gets his jollies watching you do all the work.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I'm not your assistant.

I'm mocking your fake rule that doesn't exist.

Tell Supreme Court Justice Garland that the rule doesn't exist.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

as detailed here, its a violation of campaign finance law. Michael Cohen went to jail for for it.

Cohen violated the campaign finance law?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Tell Supreme Court Justice Garland that the rule doesn't exist.

So when anyone does something, it becomes a rule?

You are a strange one. Easily dominated. A follower.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

So when anyone does something, it becomes a rule?

You are a strange one. Easily dominated. A follower.

You think Schumer is going to confirm a Republican choice in that same scenario?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You think Schumer is going to confirm a Republican choice in that same scenario?

No, only the republican slime would do that.

But welcome to the new normal.