Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 110,309
- 99,396
- 3,645
Then why didn't Trump want to prove that in court?Nothing To get away with because there was Nothing to begin with
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Then why didn't Trump want to prove that in court?Nothing To get away with because there was Nothing to begin with
Ahh yes, you favor prosecuting political opponents just like the good Marxist shitbag you are.Unfortunately, the Democrats may never get another opportunity to learn from that lesson.
Let's hope that DC cop that murdered American Patriot Ashli Babbitt will be getting a visit from his department's Internal Affairs Detectives real soon.Get lost, fucktard.
Did Mr. Lock Her Up say something?Ahh yes, you favor prosecuting political opponents just like the good Marxist shitbag you are.
Oh look, a cute new rule that doesn't exist and which you made up out of thin air, after the fact.
Which federal statute does an NDA violate, Peanut?Sure, Kleetus. If your dumb MAGA gomer shit was true, then Garland would have gone after Trump more....like in the Stormy Daniels hush money case.
That should have been Federal charges also.
the 130k was an unlawful corporate contribution in breach of the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) of 1971;Which federal statute does an NDA violate, Peanut?
No. It wasn’t.the 130k was an unlawful corporate contribution in breach of the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) of 1971;
Not on Trump to prove anything in court, Simp.Then why didn't Trump want to prove that in court?
Not even close.the 130k was an unlawful corporate contribution in breach of the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) of 1971;
Nope. Trump's defense team wanted the head of the FEC to testify no laws were broken, but Merchan said no.the 130k was an unlawful corporate contribution in breach of the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) of 1971;
The FEC also said it had found “reason to believe” violations of campaign finance law were made “knowingly and willfully” by the Trump campaign.Nope. Trump's defense team wanted the head of the FEC to testify no laws were broken, but Merchan said no.
Those 34 felonies are DOA, dead on appeal.
![]()
FEC drops investigation into Trump hush money payments
The Federal Elections Commission (FEC) has closed its investigation into whether former President Trump illegally made hush money payments to women prior to the 2016 election. The FEC vot…thehill.com
FEC drops investigation into Trump hush money payments
1. That is a circular argument. There was no FEC crime, so said the FEC.The FEC also said it had found “reason to believe” violations of campaign finance law were made “knowingly and willfully” by the Trump campaign.
this is nothing more than republican board members in the FEC decided not the proceed.
and the state of new york wouldnt have been able to indict on the business records fraud as a felony unless it was used to conceal this crime.
falsifying business records in New York can be a felony if the defendant intends to commit or conceal another crime.1. That is a circular argument. There was no FEC crime, so said the FEC.
2. Merchan said there was, that just proves a Kangaroo Court
3. Those illegal 34 felonies are DOA, dead on appeal.
"Below is my column in the Hill on the most compelling grounds for an appeal in the Trump case after his conviction on 34 counts in Manhattan."![]()
Buzz Kill: The Trump Conviction Presents a Target-Rich Environment for Appeal
Below is my column in the Hill on the most compelling grounds for an appeal in the Trump case after his conviction on 34 counts in Manhattan. There has been considerable criticism of the defense te…jonathanturley.org
and the state of new york wouldnt have been able to indict on the business records fraud as a felony unless it was used to conceal this crime.
This requires no conviction, but only evidence of that the crime.
this is detailed here.What evidence of another crime?
What a bizarre thing to say, given what happened a week before the 2020 election.It exists now.
Garland should have started his Jan 6 criminal investigations of Trump on 20 Jan 2021, as soon as Joe Biden entered office. Instead, Garland wasted over 2 years prosecuting all of the imbecile MAGA bumpkins who attacked the Capitol on Jan 6.
Garland would have done absolutely nothing to prosecute Trump if it had not been for the House Jan 6 Committee putting pressure on Garland during the summer of 2022.
History is going to crucify both Merrick Garland and Joe Biden for letting Trump get away with this. It is like Jefferson Davis being allowed to run for President in 1868, as if nothing had ever happened. Biden campaigned in 2020 and 2022 and 2024 talking about what a threat to democracy Trump was....and then did nothing about it.
Biden and Garland actually gave Trump legitimacy to run for president, by failing to take action immediately in 2021. President Bernie Sanders would have thrown Trump's ass in jail in 2021 or 2022 and permanently lost the key.
Don't take my word for it...listen to Elie Mystal on this podcast with Michael Steel, starting at about 49:20.
The bad guys have won. It's a very bitter pill to swallow.