Merged -- Kavanaugh/Ford Opinion and Comment Threads for 30 Sept.

[BULLDOG]

Shocking Truth on Kavanaugh’s Accuser: Christine Blasey Ford's High School Yearbooks

Have a look for yourself and then tell me how her credibility is better than Kavanaugh's.

There is NO DOUBT in my mind after reading through this that she was nothing more than a wannabe barfly. And this teenager is what has our nation turned upside down...

How do old yearbook pictures and captions that don't include Ford, or even reference her specifically have anything to do with whether she was attacked? Are you trying to say that all girls that attended that school deserved or wanted to be attacked?

You show a porn pic for your avatar so what’s the point

My avatar is a picture of the first daughter as she proudly flopped that titty all the way to the end of a modeling runway and back with no effort to cover herself. The right seems to think that is a fine role model for our girls. My point is that the right is using old year book photos that don't even show or specifically reference Ms Ford to trash her reputation.

 

[WheelieAddict]

Shocking Truth on Kavanaugh’s Accuser: Christine Blasey Ford's High School Yearbooks

Have a look for yourself and then tell me how her credibility is better than Kavanaugh's.

There is NO DOUBT in my mind after reading through this that she was nothing more than a wannabe barfly. And this teenager is what has our nation turned upside down...

How do old yearbook pictures and captions that don't include Ford, or even reference her specifically have anything to do with whether she was attacked? Are you trying to say that all girls that attended that school deserved or wanted to be attacked?

You show a porn pic for your avatar so what’s the point

My avatar is a picture of the first daughter as she proudly flopped that titty all the way to the end of a modeling runway and back with no effort to cover herself. The right seems to think that is a fine role model for our girls. My point is that the right is using old year book photos that don't even show or specifically reference Ms Ford to trash her reputation.

Melania is clearly bisexual with her photo spreads. Conservative christians love it!

 

[BULLDOG]

Shocking Truth on Kavanaugh’s Accuser: Christine Blasey Ford's High School Yearbooks

Have a look for yourself and then tell me how her credibility is better than Kavanaugh's.

There is NO DOUBT in my mind after reading through this that she was nothing more than a wannabe barfly. And this teenager is what has our nation turned upside down...

How do old yearbook pictures and captions that don't include Ford, or even reference her specifically have anything to do with whether she was attacked? Are you trying to say that all girls that attended that school deserved or wanted to be attacked?

That stuff can't be read because of the heavy redaction but the other day someone posted the complete entries in the Official Kavanaugh Thread. It told how Ford claimed she had sex with 24 men before she went to college, how the girls would cruise the streets, pick up drunk guys and take them to their homes when the parents were away and on and on and on. They made Peyton Place look like a Sunday school picnic. When I was in high school starting in 1951 we were doing the same things. I never saw any rapes. We would try to get the girls drunk and and the ones that did would lose all their inhibitions. They were just as bad as the boys. Every generation thinks they are the only ones to discover booze and sex. The kids today are doing the same things.

Are you really trying to say all girls from that time period were drunken sluts, and wanted to be attacked?Really? Where exactly did all that information come from? Her yearbook? If it was posted here, it should still be available. I can't find it. Of course we know no one at this site has ever posted a lie, or something from a bullshit lying site Show that information from a credible source, and I will gladly apologize for doubting your word on this.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Temper tantrum much? You made the original comment without any backup, dear.

Here, since you are lazy, a start for you

Political activities of the Koch brothers - Wikipedia
Discover the Networks | George Soros

Honey, if you want to know like I did, then you’ll do the research. I’m not your assistant. Believe what you want, even if it’s wrong. No skin off my back. But you’ll look foolish to the ones that have, if you repeat it .

Ah, so it's about me doing research rather than you proving the thing you said. Typical.

You know when people can't make their own argument that's it's total rubbish.

So I'll give you one more chance. When you produce nothing we can both accept that what you said is complete crap, okay?

As I said, you've got nothing, so you're talking crap...... Thanks for your time, but it was a waste of time.

What, you just post someone else's opinion? That's not YOUR ARGUMENT and FUCK YOU for saying I'm too lazy to DO YOUR RESEARCH FOR YOU.

No temper tantrum at all. I just get annoyed at people who come on here and pretend they're being intelligent by telling other people to do their own work for them then try and criticize people for something they are themselves.

You can't prove your assertion, you haven't even tried. So, let's just leave your bullshit and agree that you're fucking wrong because you can't even do the basics of making a fucking argument, shall we?

 

[Hossfly]

Shocking Truth on Kavanaugh’s Accuser: Christine Blasey Ford's High School Yearbooks

Have a look for yourself and then tell me how her credibility is better than Kavanaugh's.

There is NO DOUBT in my mind after reading through this that she was nothing more than a wannabe barfly. And this teenager is what has our nation turned upside down...

How do old yearbook pictures and captions that don't include Ford, or even reference her specifically have anything to do with whether she was attacked? Are you trying to say that all girls that attended that school deserved or wanted to be attacked?

That stuff can't be read because of the heavy redaction but the other day someone posted the complete entries in the Official Kavanaugh Thread. It told how Ford claimed she had sex with 24 men before she went to college, how the girls would cruise the streets, pick up drunk guys and take them to their homes when the parents were away and on and on and on. They made Peyton Place look like a Sunday school picnic. When I was in high school starting in 1951 we were doing the same things. I never saw any rapes. We would try to get the girls drunk and and the ones that did would lose all their inhibitions. They were just as bad as the boys. Every generation thinks they are the only ones to discover booze and sex. The kids today are doing the same things.

Are you really trying to say all girls from that time period were drunken sluts, and wanted to be attacked?Really? Where exactly did all that information come from? Her yearbook? If it was posted here, it should still be available. I can't find it. Of course we know no one at this site has ever posted a lie, or something from a bullshit lying site Show that information from a credible source, and I will gladly apologize for doubting your word on this.

Someone posted the complete text and I skimmed through it for the juicy parts. There are over 4000 posts in the thread. Don't apologize; it's unbecoming of a Liberal Progressive Socialist puke. You are free to look it up.

 

[The Professor]

Shocking Truth on Kavanaugh’s Accuser: Christine Blasey Ford's High School Yearbooks

Have a look for yourself and then tell me how her credibility is better than Kavanaugh's.

There is NO DOUBT in my mind after reading through this that she was nothing more than a wannabe barfly. And this teenager is what has our nation turned upside down...

I agree.

I remember when Ford's attorney asked for a week's delay in appearing before the Committee because Ford was afraid of flying and had to arrange for alternate transportation to Washington, DC. Well, it turned out that was one big lie. Ford had absolutely no fear of flying whatsoever. This was established by Rachel Mitchell, the Arizona sex-crimes prosecutor retained by the Committee to question Ford and Kavanaugh. This is how one source reported it:

“May I ask, Dr. Ford, how did you get to Washington?,” Mitchell asked.

“By airplane,” Ford responded.

Mitchell went on to establish that Ford flies frequently as part of her work for an Australian consulting firm, to visit family on the East coast, and to pursue her interests in Hawaiian culture, oceanography, and surfing.

“In fact, you fly fairly frequently for your hobbies and you’ve had to fly for your work, is that true?” Mitchell asked.

“Correct, unfortunately,” Ford answered.

Christine Blasey Ford: Brett Kavanaugh Accuser Admits She Flies Often after Citing Fear of Flying to Delay Hearing | National Review

Remember, Ford said her fear of flying was caused by fear of enclosed spaces due to Kavanaugh's assault. Since she had no fear of flying, it is clear she was lying to make her baseless claim seem more credible. Her obvious lie proves that nothing she says can be believed. She got caught. Good job Rachel Mitchell.

 

[BULLDOG]

Shocking Truth on Kavanaugh’s Accuser: Christine Blasey Ford's High School Yearbooks

Have a look for yourself and then tell me how her credibility is better than Kavanaugh's.

There is NO DOUBT in my mind after reading through this that she was nothing more than a wannabe barfly. And this teenager is what has our nation turned upside down...

How do old yearbook pictures and captions that don't include Ford, or even reference her specifically have anything to do with whether she was attacked? Are you trying to say that all girls that attended that school deserved or wanted to be attacked?

That stuff can't be read because of the heavy redaction but the other day someone posted the complete entries in the Official Kavanaugh Thread. It told how Ford claimed she had sex with 24 men before she went to college, how the girls would cruise the streets, pick up drunk guys and take them to their homes when the parents were away and on and on and on. They made Peyton Place look like a Sunday school picnic. When I was in high school starting in 1951 we were doing the same things. I never saw any rapes. We would try to get the girls drunk and and the ones that did would lose all their inhibitions. They were just as bad as the boys. Every generation thinks they are the only ones to discover booze and sex. The kids today are doing the same things.

Are you really trying to say all girls from that time period were drunken sluts, and wanted to be attacked?Really? Where exactly did all that information come from? Her yearbook? If it was posted here, it should still be available. I can't find it. Of course we know no one at this site has ever posted a lie, or something from a bullshit lying site Show that information from a credible source, and I will gladly apologize for doubting your word on this.

Someone posted the complete text and I skimmed through it for the juicy parts. There are over 4000 posts in the thread. Don't apologize; it's unbecoming of a Liberal Progressive Socialist puke. You are free to look it up.

Right. You expect me to look through 4000 posts to find proof of your bullshit claim. Just admit you got nothing. No need to lie about it.

 

[GWV5903]

She’s a compulsive lying piece of shit, simply put. No proof, all of her so called witnesses denied any knowledge of the event. Yet the dishonorable Senator from California sat on this for 6 weeks and will most likely face no retribution for it. Feinstein’s questionable actions going unpunished spell the whole truth to this fiasco, it has no merit of being truthful, it would have died a peaceful death had they followed normal procedures, but it certainly wouldn’t have the same affect. New rules should be established to sensor such individuals for the remainder of their terms when they contribute in this manor. Scum has a far better reputation than the imbecile Democrats of the SJC, draining the swamp is going to become much easier with these actions....

 

[BULLDOG]

She’s a compulsive lying piece of shit, simply put. No proof, all of her so called witnesses denied any knowledge of the event. Yet the dishonorable Senator from California sat on this for 6 weeks and will most likely face no retribution for it. Feinstein’s questionable actions going unpunished spell the whole truth to this fiasco, it has no merit of being truthful, it would have died a peaceful death had they followed normal procedures, but it certainly wouldn’t have the same affect. New rules should be established to sensor such individuals for the remainder of their terms when they contribute in this manor. Scum has a far better reputation than the imbecile Democrats of the SJC, draining the swamp is going to become much easier with these actions....

So why are so many of his class mates saying he lied about his excessive drinking?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Shocking Truth on Kavanaugh’s Accuser: Christine Blasey Ford's High School Yearbooks

Have a look for yourself and then tell me how her credibility is better than Kavanaugh's.

There is NO DOUBT in my mind after reading through this that she was nothing more than a wannabe barfly. And this teenager is what has our nation turned upside down...

How do old yearbook pictures and captions that don't include Ford, or even reference her specifically have anything to do with whether she was attacked? Are you trying to say that all girls that attended that school deserved or wanted to be attacked?

You show a porn pic for your avatar so what’s the point

My avatar is a picture of the first daughter as she proudly flopped that titty all the way to the end of a modeling runway and back with no effort to cover herself. The right seems to think that is a fine role model for our girls. My point is that the right is using old year book photos that don't even show or specifically reference Ms Ford to trash her reputation.

Melania is clearly bisexual with her photo spreads. Conservative christians love it!

You can tell somebody’s sexual preference by a photo shoot they were getting paid to do? How liberal of you.


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

I just watched her testimony again. She sounds credible if all you go by is visual and auditory clues. But if you listen to her story she does not seem credible at all. She lies about being afraid to fly, she pretends she had no idea the entire Committee offered to fly to California to meet with her (all 21 of them) on the previous Monday, and at that moment in testimony on Thursday she says "I didn't realize that was an option, and I don't know why I didn't know that"

Well Geeze, who was managing the communication between her and Congress? From what I have heard the Dems refused to take part in any hearings at all until the one Ford finally personally agreed to do, so we know the Dems were not telling her about the offer previous, and neither were her attorneys. That's is a HUGE conflict of interest and I hope the FBI looks into that as well.

If she is indeed a credible witness telling the truth - she was legally entitled to be told the entire committee offered to fly to California to meet with her four days earlier, so she wouldn't have to get on a scary "airplane" going all the way to Washington DC from California. After all, that isn't Tahiti, it's a scary place where she normally only has to fly one time each year to see her family.

Even if nobody did tell her, it was all over the media. I mean if I was in the national spotlight due to a major controversy, I would be reading everything I could about what was being reported about me. Unless she can claim she never watches the news or reads a newspaper, she’s FOS.


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

If she refuses to say where and when the alleged assault happened, she is simply not credible. She was quite obviously being so vague because she knows that if she doesn't say when and where it happened, she cannot be proven wrong and be prosecuted for her perjury.

That said, Trump should reconsider his nomination. The guy was actually crying at the hearing. If he cannot lay off the bottle for even one fucking day when he has to testify under oath, he's got a serious drinking problem.

Because he was crying makes you think he was drinking? Then Ford must have put down about two bottles.

She was obviously faking it. She was trying very hard to cry, she made sad faces and made her voice warble into a high falsetto, but alas, the only tears shed during her testimony came from her audience.

Besides, people in her profession know better than to drink with Prozac.

If she was really crying, she would have had to remove her glasses from time to time to wipe her eyes. While I didn’t watch the entire thing, I never seen her do that once.

When my allergies kick up, my eyes water up pretty good. I wear reading glasses, and I am constantly taking them off to wipe my eyes.


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

 

[depotoo]

“Mitchell acknowledged that the standard of proof in a nomination hearing is less daunting than in a criminal trial. But she said the allegations against Kavanaugh didn't even rise to a lesser "preponderance-of-the-evidence" standard.

She highlighted what she said were inconsistencies in Ford's memory of dates, events and details, including who invited her to the party where the alleged assault occurred, the address of the home where the party took place or how she got to the party.

Mitchell wrote that in her (Ford) previous accounts of the alleged incident — particularly in notes of sessions with marriage and individual therapists in 2012 and 2013 — Ford struggled to identify Kavanaugh as the assailant by name.“
Evidence doesn't support claims against Kavanaugh, Judiciary Committee questioner says

 

[tyroneweaver]

Shocking Truth on Kavanaugh’s Accuser: Christine Blasey Ford's High School Yearbooks

Have a look for yourself and then tell me how her credibility is better than Kavanaugh's.

There is NO DOUBT in my mind after reading through this that she was nothing more than a wannabe barfly. And this teenager is what has our nation turned upside down...

How do old yearbook pictures and captions that don't include Ford, or even reference her specifically have anything to do with whether she was attacked? Are you trying to say that all girls that attended that school deserved or wanted to be attacked?

You show a porn pic for your avatar so what’s the point

My avatar is a picture of the first daughter as she proudly flopped that titty all the way to the end of a modeling runway and back with no effort to cover herself. The right seems to think that is a fine role model for our girls. My point is that the right is using old year book photos that don't even show or specifically reference Ms Ford to trash her reputation.

You post essentially a porn pic and portray yourself as a saint...hilarious

 

[Claudette]

“Mitchell acknowledged that the standard of proof in a nomination hearing is less daunting than in a criminal trial. But she said the allegations against Kavanaugh didn't even rise to a lesser "preponderance-of-the-evidence" standard.

She highlighted what she said were inconsistencies in Ford's memory of dates, events and details, including who invited her to the party where the alleged assault occurred, the address of the home where the party took place or how she got to the party.

Mitchell wrote that in her (Ford) previous accounts of the alleged incident — particularly in notes of sessions with marriage and individual therapists in 2012 and 2013 — Ford struggled to identify Kavanaugh as the assailant by name.“
Evidence doesn't support claims against Kavanaugh, Judiciary Committee questioner says

Yup the whole thing is a shit show with a woman who can't remember much of anything.

No proof. No witnesses. Just a giant shit show.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

“Mitchell acknowledged that the standard of proof in a nomination hearing is less daunting than in a criminal trial. But she said the allegations against Kavanaugh didn't even rise to a lesser "preponderance-of-the-evidence" standard.

She highlighted what she said were inconsistencies in Ford's memory of dates, events and details, including who invited her to the party where the alleged assault occurred, the address of the home where the party took place or how she got to the party.

Mitchell wrote that in her (Ford) previous accounts of the alleged incident — particularly in notes of sessions with marriage and individual therapists in 2012 and 2013 — Ford struggled to identify Kavanaugh as the assailant by name.“
Evidence doesn't support claims against Kavanaugh, Judiciary Committee questioner says

Yup the whole thing is a shit show with a woman who can't remember much of anything.

No proof. No witnesses. Just a giant shit show.

She remembered the important stuff like she only drank one beer.


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

 

[Claudette]

“Mitchell acknowledged that the standard of proof in a nomination hearing is less daunting than in a criminal trial. But she said the allegations against Kavanaugh didn't even rise to a lesser "preponderance-of-the-evidence" standard.

She highlighted what she said were inconsistencies in Ford's memory of dates, events and details, including who invited her to the party where the alleged assault occurred, the address of the home where the party took place or how she got to the party.

Mitchell wrote that in her (Ford) previous accounts of the alleged incident — particularly in notes of sessions with marriage and individual therapists in 2012 and 2013 — Ford struggled to identify Kavanaugh as the assailant by name.“
Evidence doesn't support claims against Kavanaugh, Judiciary Committee questioner says

Yup the whole thing is a shit show with a woman who can't remember much of anything.

No proof. No witnesses. Just a giant shit show.

She remembered the important stuff like she only drank one beer.


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

That's the only thing she seems to remember. She has no proof and the witnesses she put forward say they weren't at that party.

An investigation won't prove anything because no agency I know of will be able to investigate something that supposedly happened 36 years ago.

BK has been investigated by the FBI six times already. If they had found anything it would have been reported.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

“Mitchell acknowledged that the standard of proof in a nomination hearing is less daunting than in a criminal trial. But she said the allegations against Kavanaugh didn't even rise to a lesser "preponderance-of-the-evidence" standard.

She highlighted what she said were inconsistencies in Ford's memory of dates, events and details, including who invited her to the party where the alleged assault occurred, the address of the home where the party took place or how she got to the party.

Mitchell wrote that in her (Ford) previous accounts of the alleged incident — particularly in notes of sessions with marriage and individual therapists in 2012 and 2013 — Ford struggled to identify Kavanaugh as the assailant by name.“
Evidence doesn't support claims against Kavanaugh, Judiciary Committee questioner says

Yup the whole thing is a shit show with a woman who can't remember much of anything.

No proof. No witnesses. Just a giant shit show.

She remembered the important stuff like she only drank one beer.


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

That's the only thing she seems to remember. She has no proof and the witnesses she put forward say they weren't at that party.

An investigation won't prove anything because no agency I know of will be able to investigate something that supposedly happened 36 years ago.

BK has been investigated by the FBI six times already. If they had found anything it would have been reported.

The Democrats created the story so it can’t be proven or disproven. It was no accident. She went to her therapist in 2012 when Romney was running for President. It was no secret that he liked Kavanaough as a potential nominee.


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

 

[Pop23]

Shocking Truth on Kavanaugh’s Accuser: Christine Blasey Ford's High School Yearbooks

Have a look for yourself and then tell me how her credibility is better than Kavanaugh's.

There is NO DOUBT in my mind after reading through this that she was nothing more than a wannabe barfly. And this teenager is what has our nation turned upside down...

I agree.

I remember when Ford's attorney asked for a week's delay in appearing before the Committee because Ford was afraid of flying and had to arrange for alternate transportation to Washington, DC. Well, it turned out that was one big lie. Ford had absolutely no fear of flying whatsoever. This was established by Rachel Mitchell, the Arizona sex-crimes prosecutor retained by the Committee to question Ford and Kavanaugh. This is how one source reported it:

“May I ask, Dr. Ford, how did you get to Washington?,” Mitchell asked.

“By airplane,” Ford responded.

Mitchell went on to establish that Ford flies frequently as part of her work for an Australian consulting firm, to visit family on the East coast, and to pursue her interests in Hawaiian culture, oceanography, and surfing.

“In fact, you fly fairly frequently for your hobbies and you’ve had to fly for your work, is that true?” Mitchell asked.

“Correct, unfortunately,” Ford answered.

Christine Blasey Ford: Brett Kavanaugh Accuser Admits She Flies Often after Citing Fear of Flying to Delay Hearing | National Review

Remember, Ford said her fear of flying was caused by fear of enclosed spaces due to Kavanaugh's assault. Since she had no fear of flying, it is clear she was lying to make her baseless claim seem more credible. Her obvious lie proves that nothing she says can be believed. She got caught. Good job Rachel Mitchell.

She also required the delay so they could arrange child care. We can only assume that the need for child care would be required so the Husband could be at the Hearing to support his Wife. But where was he? What husband does not attend a Hearing that puts their wife in the National Spotlight? He was not at the Hearing and it is said he was in California taking care of the children. So, another lie about the delay.

The husbands absence also leads to questions about the need for couples counseling? Why did they need counseling in the first place? hmmmmmmmm

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Imagine needing to be defended by a drama queen.

You lost the Senate's Jake Starkey.

You're beyond fucked