WorldWatcher
Platinum Member
1. The perfectly legal NDA itself should not have been considered a "campaign contribution". That NDA could have been considered protection for his marriage and/or reputation. Saying voters would consider Trump having sex with a porn star as surprising is hilarious. It was NOT a campaign contribution, so said the FEC who investigated the matter.
If Trump had paid for the NDA you might have an argumnet. Although be FEC law he would have still had to report it.
But you are still under the incorrect impression that Trump paid for the NDA. He didn't Cohen paid for the NDA by taking the loan out on his house and paid for the NDA with his own funds.
2. Cohen's crime was not Trump's crime. Stormy's NDA had nothing to do with covering up Cohen's illegal campaign contribution. How can paying Stormy be called covering up paying Stormy?
Correct Cohen's crime (campaign fraud) was Cohen's crime. Trump's crime (feloniouis falsificatio of business records) was Trump's crime.
3. Trump falsified business records? As Turley explains it"
I don't give a flying rat fart what booklicker Turley claims. My opinion derives from the law, evidence, and the results of a jury conviction.
WW