I never said that Greenland represents the temperature of the entire world...that is your stupid interpretation of what I said..
Run faster! Woo hoo!
.I said that the ice core temperature reconstruction from the arctic circle,
You're lying. Everyone knows it.
That was the argument you retreated to, but it wasn't your initial argument. Crick was talking about global temps, and you trotted out those graphs in reply. You clearly meant that one spot in Greenland as a stand in for global temps.
..then pointed out that climate science says that the poles are the canary in the coal mine..
Which, again, has jack to do with the dishonesty of you pretending that one spot in Greenland represented global temperature.
However, we have made progress. You've finally admitted that it was very dishonest of you to pretend that one spot in Greenland represents global temperature. You didn't say it directly, but as you are trying to backpedal away from the tactic, it's clear you are aware of the dishonesty and stupidity of the tactic.
That passes for intelligent conversation in your world?
I have repeatedly asked you to quit it with the name calling and insults. You have consistently refused. Thus, you can shove your hypocritical whining. Heat, kitchen.
My offer still stands. You won't take it. After all, if you can't scream insults, you'll have nothing to write.
You were the one who claimed that Russians apparently couldn't do science and disregard his published work based on his nationality..
And you end with an outright lie. That's your other main tactic.
Now, for the third time, why do you embrace the Russian guy's model over actual historical Arctic Sea Ice measurements?