Megyn Kelly debunks Smith's claims against Trump and makes the case he is election interfering

[OKTexas]

I gave you facts which disproved you ignorant assertion.

Your questions don’t change any of that.

And you still chose to ignore my questions, go ******* figure. Any legitimate reason to continue this discussion has been exhausted.

.

 

[Marener]

And you still chose to ignore my questions, go ******* figure. Any legitimate reason to continue this discussion has been exhausted.

.

If you had questions which were relevant to the issue, please ask them.

Better yet, try to answer them yourself.

 

[OKTexas]

If you had questions which were relevant to the issue, please ask them.

Better yet, try to answer them yourself.

I already have, and what did you fail to understand about my last post?

.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

And that claim would be?????????????????

.

You are the one who made it.

 

[Marener]

I already have, and what did you fail to understand about my last post?

.

Prove Smith filed the motion late. You just made the accusation but it appears that it’s totally baseless, like the rest of your accusations.

 

[Billo_Really]

There is another thread about Smith engaging in election interference. But this is more about the expert discussion by Megyn Kelly who is actually a lawyer.
Watch her dismiss Smith now. Smith will be dismissed later by a Judge as he was when Cannon Dismissed him earlier.

Don't even bring up that **** judge in Florida!

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

We have a right wing Gish Gallop on many of the threads right now.

OK Texas may be using bots to push immediate responses no matter how stupid.

 

[Robert W]

We have a right wing Gish Gallop on many of the threads right now.

OK Texas may be using bots to push immediate responses no matter how stupid.

^^^^^^For those who have no clue what a Gish Gallop is, read the above.

 

[meaner gene]

Funny, I saw no deadlines handed down by SCOTUS or the judge in the case. The timing was deliberate on smith's part.

.

The sooner that Smith responds, the sooner he can get the interlocutory appeals out of the way.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It's hilarious to me that Trumpers think Megyn Kelly somehow outsmarted the courts and the prosecutors and Trump's 7-figure cost defense team.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

^^^^^^For those who have no clue what a Gish Gallop is, read the above.

For all: that wasn't a Gish Gallop

 

[MisterBeale]

For all: that wasn't a Gish Gallop

FWIW, neither is the stuff Slow Horses is accusing folks of.

 

[meaner gene]

Prove Smith filed the motion late. You just made the accusation but it appears that it’s totally baseless, like the rest of your accusations.

It's 165 pages long.
It takes a while to write something that long, no less fact check every sentence in it.

 

[OKTexas]

Prove Smith filed the motion late. You just made the accusation but it appears that it’s totally baseless, like the rest of your accusations.

According to what you posted, it was due Sep 26th, it wasn't filed until Oct 2nd.

https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2024/10/gov.uscourts.dcd_.258148.252.0.pdf

 

[Marener]

According to what you posted, it was due Sep 26th, it wasn't filed until Oct 2nd.

View attachment 1023297

https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2024/10/gov.uscourts.dcd_.258148.252.0.pdf

That’s not the original motion, which was not filed on the public docket because of the protective order the judge has in place.

That’s the public motion which was redacted and published as a result of the judge’s decision to unseal it.

 

[OKTexas]

The sooner that Smith responds, the sooner he can get the interlocutory appeals out of the way.

Yet he filed it 6 days late, go figure. Barely a month before the election, it's was all planned. Makes you wonder why he wasn't chastised or sanctioned by the commie judge. Of course she wasted no time in getting it out to the public. Kind of looks like it was planned that way.

.

 

[OKTexas]

That’s not the original motion, which was not filed on the public docket because of the protective order the judge has in place.

That’s the public motion which was redacted and published as a result of the judge’s decision to unseal it.

Of course you have a link for that?

.

 

[meaner gene]

According to what you posted, it was due Sep 26th, it wasn't filed until Oct 2nd.

View attachment 1023297

https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2024/10/gov.uscourts.dcd_.258148.252.0.pdf

Are you referring to the motion or the redacted motion.

You know Smith filed two motions, what you posted was the second (redacted) version.

 

[Marener]

Of course you have a link for that?

.

See the motion to unseal by Jack Smith from Sept 27th.

Obviously they didn’t file the motion for immunity on October 2nd because the judge ruled on October 2nd to release it after reviewing the motion from Sept 27th. It doesn’t make any sense.

You’re reaching. None of this makes any difference.

 

[meaner gene]

Of course you have a link for that?

.

You're the one who confused the deadlines for the original motion, and the redacted version.