Meet Repub Senate candidate Ken Paxton

[Rawley]

The answer is that you’re wrong to ignore his history of broke promises.

His character matters. He has poor character.

But according to MAGA, cheating on your wife is a masculine thing to do so they celebrate him.

LOL and the guy banging an intern in the Oval office and spending quality time with Epstein is still a leader in your cult

 

[Lockback]

Your cult has made impeachment meaningless

Completely and totally meaningless.

 

[Marener]

LOL and the guy banging an intern in the Oval office and spending quality time with Epstein is still a leader in your cult

Calling Bill Clinton a current leader is pretty outlandish.

 

[Seymour Flops]

The answer is that you’re wrong to ignore his history of broke promises.

His character matters. He has poor character.

But according to MAGA, cheating on your wife is a masculine thing to do so they celebrate him.

Character matters, I agree. So if you know of any candidates that you can guarantee will never be found to be of poor character when it comes to their person life let me know.

Until then, I'll vote for the guy that does not think that their are 6 genders (why six?), does not want children to be give "gender affirming" care arranged by school counselors and psychologists with parents having no say, and does not want grown men in bathrooms and changing rooms with little girls.

 

[Marener]

Character matters, I agree. So if you know of any candidates that you can guarantee will never be found to be of poor character when it comes to their person life let me know.

Until then, I'll vote for the guy that does not think that their are 6 genders (why six?), does not want children to be give "gender affirming" care arranged by school counselors and psychologists with parents having no say, and does not want grown men in bathrooms and changing rooms with little girls.

This is the height of rationalization.

It’s okay to vote for someone with KNOWN bad character because the opponent MIGHT also have bad character.

No, it does not appear as though you think character matters.

 

[Mac-7]

All evidence points to him being corrupt and generally speaking a bad person.

You just believe anything that’s convenient.

If you don’t want to believe something, the truth is unknowable and it doesn’t matter.

Meanwhile, whenever you want to believe something, you don’t need any evidence because anything can be true.

If cornyn was the nominee you would be attacking him instead

Paxton represents a real conservative vote in the senate

 

[Seymour Flops]

This is the height of rationalization.

It’s okay to vote for someone with KNOWN bad character because the opponent MIGHT also have bad character.

No, it does not appear as though you think character matters.

A person who says that grown men should be naked in a room full of naked little girls and that the girls are "transphobic" if they complain has far worse character than Ken Paxton.

Also, assuming that Tallirico is gay and has a committed male (or "transwoman") partner, what kind of character does he show by claiming that a biological female is his "girlfriend?"

 

[Robert W]

This is the height of rationalization.

It’s okay to vote for someone with KNOWN bad character because the opponent MIGHT also have bad character.

No, it does not appear as though you think character matters.

Tallarico has bad character.

 

[Marener]

If cornyn was the nominee you would be attacking him instead

I would based on policy decisions where I disagree with him, but I do not have any reason to believe he’s corrupt like Paxton.

Notably, being found guilty doesn’t matter to you anyway, since you claim people who are found guilty are the victims of biased judges and juries.

Because to you, there is not truth other than what you want to believe.

Paxton represents a real conservative vote in the senate

Cornyn is also a real conservative.

Paxton represents the corruption of power, which you don’t actually care about.

The ends justifies the means.

 

[Rawley]

Calling Bill Clinton a current leader is pretty outlandish.

 

[Marener]

That’s the best you can do? A private fundraiser two yard ago?

Okay dude.

 

[Mac-7]

I would based on policy decisions where I disagree with him, but I do not have any reason to believe he’s corrupt like Paxton.

Notably, being found guilty doesn’t matter to you anyway, since you claim people who are found guilty are the victims of biased judges and juries.

Because to you, there is not truth other than what you want to believe.

Cornyn is also a real conservative.

Paxton represents the corruption of power, which you don’t actually care about.

The ends justifies the means.

Paxton’s policies are far better, aka more conservative, than cornyn, who was just a typical inside washington swamp rat

He was out of step with Texas voters and Texas values

 

[Marener]

Paxton’s policies are far better, aka more conservative, than cornyn, who was just a typical inside washington swamp rat

He was out of step with Texas voters and Texas values

I don’t think wanting to abolish the Senate Filibuster is at all conservative and really very radical.

Paxton was chosen by the extreme right in a very low turnout primary. He’s far more radical than Cornyn.

 

[rightwinger]

The more people learn about him, the less they're gonna like him.

Doesn’t seem to be working that way
Republicans are lukewarm to Paxton and Cornyn supporters are saying they won’t vote for him
Look for a low Republican turnout

 

[Rawley]

That’s the best you can do? A private fundraiser two yard ago?

Okay dude.

Last time your party had any relevance.

But back to the point, you party still adores the guy banging an intern in the Oval office and spending quality time with Epstein

So pardon our laughter when you attack ANYONE for a lack of character.

 

[Marener]

Last time your party had any relevance.

But back to the point, you party still adores the guy banging an intern in the Oval office and spending quality time with Epstein

So pardon our laughter when you attack ANYONE for a lack of character.

One would think a leader of the party would have some public presence that you could point to, but you can’t.

MAGA is obsessed with masculinity and there’s nothing more masculine to them than ******* anyone you want.

It’s something they actually admire.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Calling Bill Clinton a current leader is pretty outlandish.

Who else is there?

Your Party is leaderless and lost. Feckless and unwilling to put in the work to develop a set of guiding principles. They are too scared to suggest anything of which the squad would disapprove, but unable to unite behind the Squad as the true leadership.

 

[Marener]

Who else is there?

Your Party is leaderless and lost. Feckless and unwilling to put in the work to develop a set of guiding principles. They are too scared to suggest anything of which the squad would disapprove, but unable to unite behind the Squad as the true leadership.

There is no clear leader for Dems at this time.

If there is, Clinton definitely isn’t it.

At least our guiding principles aren’t corrupt like MAGAs.

 

[rightwinger]

LOL and the guy banging an intern in the Oval office and spending quality time with Epstein is still a leader in your cult

You do realize Trump was mentioned 30,000 times in the Epstein files?

 

[Seymour Flops]

There is no clear leader for Dems at this time.

If there is, Clinton definitely isn’t it.

At least our guiding principles aren’t corrupt like MAGAs.

If your guiding principles are so great, why does no one want to emerge as a leader?

You realize this leaderless status - or refusal to name a leader, due to having no leaders with character you can point to without them being immediately flamed for their corruption and depravity - guarantees you a loss in 2028, which in turn guarantees a MAGA president in 2028 and the foreseeable future?

Why don't you take over leadership of the Party?