Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ok...so what is so ruinous aboutThey did the same thing with every story they created during the Trump administration. They outed themselves totally as pure propagandists and roughly half the nation was glad to join the hate-fest and still belly up to the trough today.
They will literally cheer for the death of America if it means taking down the Bad Orange Man and the fools don't even seem to worry that they'll be burning down their own house, at the same time.
No..that loserstink is unmistakable.You mistake him for a lying leftist.
We have it now, and you are complaining.Except leftist scum don't want any of that.
Citations please.Ok...so what is so ruinous about
More Americans working
Producing more energy
Higher rate of economic growth
More peace/kumbaya
Falling deficit.
?
The official Unemployment Rate has been bogus ever since they stopped including people that stop looking for work after 6 months.UE is 3.8, we have 8mm unfilled good jobs, consumer spending is very strong, and the NLPR is up.
Why is anyone bitching?
The data doesn't care about your feelings.Fake news.
So if the methods of measuring unemployment and inflation are manipulated to push a specific narrative, that doesn't bother you?Lone Wanderer's opinions are not facts; his beliefs are not facts; his hopes are not facts.
The stats are real. There is no hoax.
You have to prove, not assert, that the announcment "are manipulated" in order to make your points.So if the methods of measuring unemployment and inflation are manipulated to push a specific narrative, that doesn't bother you?
I'll give another example. The US's measurement of living at the poverty line is much stricter than the one used in Canada. If we used Canada's method, our poverty rate would be much higher.
I'll start with the obvious one. Why would the Unemployment Rate go from including all those of working age not working to only including those who haven't spent 6 months inactive in looking for work? That was a change made many years ago, and it twisted the perception of unemployment.You have to prove, not assert, that the announcment "are manipulated" in order to make your points.
Do it if you can. Your assertions are not factual evidence.
Those are assertive questions, not evidence. Show the differences at what you are trying to define.I'll start with the obvious one. Why would the Unemployment Rate go from including all those of working age not working to only including those who haven't spent 6 months inactive in looking for work? That was a change made many years ago, and it twisted the perception of unemployment.
Those are assertive questions, not evidence. Show the differences at what you are trying to define.