Me Too movement spent $1.4m on salaries including $157k on conferences at luxury resorts

OP
Shelzin

Shelzin

Equal Opportunity Asshole
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2012
Messages
5,571
Reaction score
2,577
Points
198
I do. You got fooled. Again. And you got fooled by the Biden cancer charity story, too. Does it embarrass you at all to know that people out there are intentionally fooling you, and that it's actually pretty easy to do? It should.
Feel free to show me how I got fooled.
 

Fort Fun Indiana

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2017
Messages
44,972
Reaction score
5,668
Points
1,870
I do. You got fooled. Again. And you got fooled by the Biden cancer charity story, too. Does it embarrass you at all to know that people out there are intentionally fooling you, and that it's actually pretty easy to do? It should.
Feel free to show me how I got fooled.
No, you need to show yourself. I can't always be there to hold your hand. Start with the Biden charity. Go find out what they did with the money they took in, and why, and what their function and mnission was. Then, once you have, immediately smack yourself in the face for even talking about "how much money they gave directly to cancer research".

or don't. be a gullible little sheep forever. It's out of my hands, now.
 
OP
Shelzin

Shelzin

Equal Opportunity Asshole
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2012
Messages
5,571
Reaction score
2,577
Points
198
I do. You got fooled. Again. And you got fooled by the Biden cancer charity story, too. Does it embarrass you at all to know that people out there are intentionally fooling you, and that it's actually pretty easy to do? It should.
Feel free to show me how I got fooled.
No, you need to show yourself. I can't always be there to hold your hand. Start with the Biden charity. Go find out what they did with the money they took in, and why, and what their function and mnission was. Then, once you have, immediately smack yourself in the face for even talking about "how much money they gave directly to cancer research".

or don't. be a gullible little sheep forever. It's out of my hands, now.
Umm... I already did that. Again... If THAT'S what you want your money to go to... Go ahead... Most of it goes to the SALARIES of people running it. This is fact. Yes?

And if you think that is worth giving your money too... I say good on you. I won't.

Edit: As a good faith gesture I used the very first google search. Very left leaning article.



The Numbers at the Heart of the Controversy
During fiscal years 2017 and 2018, the organization received more than $4 million dollars in funding, of which $3,070,301—or 63.8%—went toward paying employee salaries and $799,671 was spent on organizing and holding events, such as conferences.



As for the New York Post article’s suggestion that Biden Cancer Initiative employees were potentially overpaid, the Cancer Letter reports that the Biden Initiative’s CEO, Gregory Simon, earned a salary similar to that of CEOs of other health care nonprofits. Simon earned $654,389 during his tenure as CEO, or an average of $327,194 per year. For comparison, the CEO of the Livestrong Foundation earned $348,609, and the president of the Prevent Cancer Foundation earned $352,567 in 2018.
It should be noted... I wouldn't give to ANY of those charities now.
 
Last edited:

Fort Fun Indiana

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2017
Messages
44,972
Reaction score
5,668
Points
1,870
Umm... I already did that.
Liar. Clearly you did not. Else you would have smacked yourself for believing white wing New York Post propaganda and would not be repeating it here. Go waste someone else's time, ya liar.
 

Fort Fun Indiana

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2017
Messages
44,972
Reaction score
5,668
Points
1,870
Umm... I already did that.
Liar. Clearly you did not. Else you would have smacked yourself for believing white wing New York Post propaganda and would not be repeating it here. Go waste someone else's time, ya liar.
Notice the edit. *smiles*
A smilin' liar. You never read a word about Biden's charity, and probably never even got past the NY POst headline. Typical white winger, proud of being ignorant.
 
OP
Shelzin

Shelzin

Equal Opportunity Asshole
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2012
Messages
5,571
Reaction score
2,577
Points
198
A smilin' liar. You never read a word about Biden's charity, and probably never even got past the NY POst headline. Typical white winger, proud of being ignorant.
I posted it... ROFLAMO

Edit: Are you drunk?

Edit2: Ok... See I try very hard to be a good faith poster/debater. I'll thank you if you tell me I'm wrong, and I actually am through evidence or perhaps just a philosophy of a thing that I hadn't thought of.

Now I'm ALSO big on people can SAY anything they want about themselves or others. It means nothing. You have to show it. By all means call me out, and make me defend my position... I don't mind. I'm going to do that to you... Fair play... But holy shit man... o.0
 
Last edited:

CowboyTed

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2014
Messages
9,533
Reaction score
2,600
Points
290
Location
Ireland
A weekend away for the NRA.... I presume you are suitably outraged over that
Why would I be? They can give their money to whoever they want. So can the people who give to this charity. Or Biden's cancer research that pays out salaries instead of going to actual cancer research... I don't mind.
I think what happened in the NRA specifically shows why you can't spent the money the way you want...

By the way are you saying BLM can't have people working for them... Modern Charities have staff who need to eat and live...
 

LeftofLeft

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
13,401
Reaction score
4,999
Points
350
Time's Up charities set up by celebrities as part of the Me Too movement paid themselves. Well... You know what they say about separating fools from their money...



Tax filings show that the organization, which was founded by Hollywood celebrities and is made up from the Time's Up Foundation and Time's Up Now Inc., raised $3,670,219 in 2018 in its first year of operation.

However, less than 10% was spent on helping those women who have experienced sexual harassment.

Filings show $312,001 was spent on the legal defense fund while $1,407,032 was spent on salaries.

And more than $157,000 was spent on conferences at luxury resorts, and a further $58,395 was spent on travel.
I don't see the problem. The legal defense fund and the initiatives are the mission.
They aren't in place to directly shelter or counsel women. Yet another scam article for gullible people.
You are shifting the conversation. The debate is not over being able directly help women. The debate is clearly over the egregious delta between the gross donations and the actual funds that go to help women; directly or indirectly.
 

Tommy Tainant

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2016
Messages
24,649
Reaction score
5,024
Points
290
Location
Y Cae Ras
The fact that these charities have staff that get paid................................................well its really made me rethink my stance on rape and sexual abuse.
 

wamose

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2019
Messages
6,788
Reaction score
5,933
Points
2,015
Location
Pennsylvania
Time's Up charities set up by celebrities as part of the Me Too movement paid themselves. Well... You know what they say about separating fools from their money...



Tax filings show that the organization, which was founded by Hollywood celebrities and is made up from the Time's Up Foundation and Time's Up Now Inc., raised $3,670,219 in 2018 in its first year of operation.

However, less than 10% was spent on helping those women who have experienced sexual harassment.

Filings show $312,001 was spent on the legal defense fund while $1,407,032 was spent on salaries.

And more than $157,000 was spent on conferences at luxury resorts, and a further $58,395 was spent on travel.
Say it isn't so. The Hollywood hucksters are selling another bogus cause? I guess the Biden porno family will get them over that. Democrat morals are like their income tax or justice departments. Plenty of loopholes for friends.
 

LeftofLeft

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
13,401
Reaction score
4,999
Points
350
The fact that these charities have staff that get paid................................................well its really made me rethink my stance on rape and sexual abuse.
Paying staff members is not the issue. The issue is the margin or ratio of total contributions from donors to money that actually goes to the cause.
 

TNHarley

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2012
Messages
69,794
Reaction score
15,688
Points
2,180
Meh. The whole thing is obviously nothing more than virtue signaling. Those disingenuous twats could care less about victims.
 

CowboyTed

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2014
Messages
9,533
Reaction score
2,600
Points
290
Location
Ireland
The fact that these charities have staff that get paid................................................well its really made me rethink my stance on rape and sexual abuse.
Paying staff members is not the issue. The issue is the margin or ratio of total contributions from donors to money that actually goes to the cause.

The charity was set up for a reason to co-ordinate research not fund it themselves... It was a project which had a timeframe and was then used by the much bigger Beau Biden Moonshot Charity... The people giving the money knew this...

It is very sad when A rated charity is politicised.. Cancer Research of very happy that a man that understands Cancer Research and Treatment is going into the White House...

A lot of charities are doing great work and not everything needs to politicised.

I will say there is some great republicans who do great work for charity...

But I am sorry, this story sticks in my gut:

He refused to even meet them.
 

Tommy Tainant

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2016
Messages
24,649
Reaction score
5,024
Points
290
Location
Y Cae Ras
The fact that these charities have staff that get paid................................................well its really made me rethink my stance on rape and sexual abuse.
Paying staff members is not the issue. The issue is the margin or ratio of total contributions from donors to money that actually goes to the cause.

The charity was set up for a reason to co-ordinate research not fund it themselves... It was a project which had a timeframe and was then used by the much bigger Beau Biden Moonshot Charity... The people giving the money knew this...

It is very sad when A rated charity is politicised.. Cancer Research of very happy that a man that understands Cancer Research and Treatment is going into the White House...

A lot of charities are doing great work and not everything needs to politicised.

I will say there is some great republicans who do great work for charity...

But I am sorry, this story sticks in my gut:

He refused to even meet them.
Cowardly fuck.
 

TheParser

Platinum Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2017
Messages
4,503
Reaction score
2,499
Points
940
Time's Up charities set up by celebrities as part of the Me Too movement paid themselves. Well... You know what they say about separating fools from their money...



Tax filings show that the organization, which was founded by Hollywood celebrities and is made up from the Time's Up Foundation and Time's Up Now Inc., raised $3,670,219 in 2018 in its first year of operation.

However, less than 10% was spent on helping those women who have experienced sexual harassment.

Filings show $312,001 was spent on the legal defense fund while $1,407,032 was spent on salaries.

And more than $157,000 was spent on conferences at luxury resorts, and a further $58,395 was spent on travel.

Hear tell that a charity set up by our next President did not spend much on its stated cause, either.

Many movements take the money & then use it for nice, comfy headqurters, flashy cars, and -- of course -- vacations in order to rest from their arduous efforts.
 

Biff_Poindexter

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2018
Messages
11,958
Reaction score
3,349
Points
290
Location
USA
I don't see the problem. The legal defense fund and the initiatives are the mission. They aren't in place to directly shelter or counsel women. Yet another scam article for gullible people.
You don't see a problem with celebrities making 90% of the millions given to the charity over the defense fund itself? Really?
Has a judge ordered them to shut down their charity yet for significant fraud allegations or something??



That would be bad no?
 

CowboyTed

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2014
Messages
9,533
Reaction score
2,600
Points
290
Location
Ireland
The fact that these charities have staff that get paid................................................well its really made me rethink my stance on rape and sexual abuse.
Paying staff members is not the issue. The issue is the margin or ratio of total contributions from donors to money that actually goes to the cause.

The charity was set up for a reason to co-ordinate research not fund it themselves... It was a project which had a timeframe and was then used by the much bigger Beau Biden Moonshot Charity... The people giving the money knew this...

It is very sad when A rated charity is politicised.. Cancer Research of very happy that a man that understands Cancer Research and Treatment is going into the White House...

A lot of charities are doing great work and not everything needs to politicised.

I will say there is some great republicans who do great work for charity...

But I am sorry, this story sticks in my gut:

He refused to even meet them.
Cowardly fuck.
Rather than Cowardly, I just think it is very sad. A man can move that far away from decency, instead of appreciating what he got and working for more to get it... He actively chose to forget them and works against them...

It is actually gut wrenching to see...
 

CowboyTed

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2014
Messages
9,533
Reaction score
2,600
Points
290
Location
Ireland
I don't see the problem. The legal defense fund and the initiatives are the mission. They aren't in place to directly shelter or counsel women. Yet another scam article for gullible people.
You don't see a problem with celebrities making 90% of the millions given to the charity over the defense fund itself? Really?
Has a judge ordered them to shut down their charity yet for significant fraud allegations or something??



That would be bad no?
Trump is gone almost...

He has legal problems which will be messy...

He will probably try and set up Trump TV but that has a limited shelf life... Fox News will flex its muscles and come hard down on them... Trump brand is in the toilet, he haemorrhaging money and he has payments due.... The Trump kids are idiots, smartest is Kushner and he is very average...

You have guys here that will sing his praises but there are guys who still back Nixon...
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top