McDonalds Introduces Self Serving Kiosks in Response to Min Wage Increase

[rightwinger]

Since the last minimum wage increase in 2009, the price of a Big Mac has gone up over a dollar
McDonalds has adjusted their prices to compensate for increased beef prices as well as other inflationary costs. Yet they claim, that raising the minimum wage will put them out of business

 

[hadit]

Since the last minimum wage increase in 2009, the price of a Big Mac has gone up over a dollar
McDonalds has adjusted their prices to compensate for increased beef prices as well as other inflationary costs. Yet they claim, that raising the minimum wage will put them out of business

View attachment 109953

Ah, so you at least acknowledge that companies would have to raise prices to accommodate for higher wages. That's something a lot of MW advocates won't do. Now the only question is, how much inflation will customers put up with when EVERYTHING they buy costs more? What happens when the advocates for the poor complain that they can no longer afford stuff?

 

[rightwinger]

wages should alway outpace inflation.

If the value of the work outpaces inflation, they do.

It is not the "value" of work ...but what they can force low skilled workers to accept

A job contributes a certain amount of revenue to a company or it doesn't exist. Paying more for that job than the money it generates means the company loses money on it. That's basic economics, and if you force the company to pay too much and it can't raise prices enough to cover the added expense, it will terminate the job entirely.

Companies make profit off of every employee

When the wages of the bulk of their employees gets frozen for eight years, they make even more profit. During that eight year period: The price of supplies, taxes, real estate, advertising, insurance and even executive pay has risen and the companies have adjusted to the market

Yet, when the lowest paid worker in the company wants higher wages....the company claims they will go bankrupt

Okay, let's be logical here.

First, companies make money off the work from every employee or the employee doesn't works for them. That means that if you artificially raise their pay with no corresponding revenue increase, some of them will be added to the "no longer works here" category.

Second, companies are not saying they will go bankrupt if we raise the MW. They're saying they will go bankrupt if we double their labor costs overnight and they can't raise prices high enough to offset the increase. It's a matter of degree.

Third, the employees who made the minimum 8 years ago are not the same employees making the minimum today. If they are, something is wrong, because as you gain skills and experience, you become more valuable. If the company doesn't recognize that increase in value with more pay, you go somewhere that will.

Most people do not spend their lives making minimum wage. You work minimum wage, maybe pay your way through college, then move to a higher salaried job....then someone else takes your old job

That is what I did making $2 an hour minimum wage. I paid for college just working summers on that wage

Todays worker would need to make $15 an hour to do the same thing

 

[rightwinger]

Since the last minimum wage increase in 2009, the price of a Big Mac has gone up over a dollar
McDonalds has adjusted their prices to compensate for increased beef prices as well as other inflationary costs. Yet they claim, that raising the minimum wage will put them out of business

View attachment 109953

Ah, so you at least acknowledge that companies would have to raise prices to accommodate for higher wages. That's something a lot of MW advocates won't do. Now the only question is, how much inflation will customers put up with when EVERYTHING they buy costs more? What happens when the advocates for the poor complain that they can no longer afford stuff?

So? How do they pay for increases in executive pay?

 

[hadit]

Since the last minimum wage increase in 2009, the price of a Big Mac has gone up over a dollar
McDonalds has adjusted their prices to compensate for increased beef prices as well as other inflationary costs. Yet they claim, that raising the minimum wage will put them out of business

View attachment 109953

Ah, so you at least acknowledge that companies would have to raise prices to accommodate for higher wages. That's something a lot of MW advocates won't do. Now the only question is, how much inflation will customers put up with when EVERYTHING they buy costs more? What happens when the advocates for the poor complain that they can no longer afford stuff?

So? How do they pay for increases in executive pay?

With increased revenue. Those workers on the bottom rung ALSO get paid more as they increase their skills and experience. If a company refuses to increase worker pay as the worker increases his value, the worker leaves and goes somewhere that will.

I think what has you confused is the company still has MW jobs that are filled by other workers as the previous ones move up the ladder. So it's not that people are stuck at dirt level wages for a lifetime.

 

[rightwinger]

Since the last minimum wage increase in 2009, the price of a Big Mac has gone up over a dollar
McDonalds has adjusted their prices to compensate for increased beef prices as well as other inflationary costs. Yet they claim, that raising the minimum wage will put them out of business

View attachment 109953

Ah, so you at least acknowledge that companies would have to raise prices to accommodate for higher wages. That's something a lot of MW advocates won't do. Now the only question is, how much inflation will customers put up with when EVERYTHING they buy costs more? What happens when the advocates for the poor complain that they can no longer afford stuff?

So? How do they pay for increases in executive pay?

With increased revenue. Those workers on the bottom rung ALSO get paid more as they increase their skills and experience. If a company refuses to increase worker pay as the worker increases his value, the worker leaves and goes somewhere that will.

I think what has you confused is the company still has MW jobs that are filled by other workers as the previous ones move up the ladder. So it's not that people are stuck at dirt level wages for a lifetime.

Increased revenue?

Exactly

Revenue generated from frozen wages in your workforce

 

[hadit]

Since the last minimum wage increase in 2009, the price of a Big Mac has gone up over a dollar
McDonalds has adjusted their prices to compensate for increased beef prices as well as other inflationary costs. Yet they claim, that raising the minimum wage will put them out of business

View attachment 109953

Ah, so you at least acknowledge that companies would have to raise prices to accommodate for higher wages. That's something a lot of MW advocates won't do. Now the only question is, how much inflation will customers put up with when EVERYTHING they buy costs more? What happens when the advocates for the poor complain that they can no longer afford stuff?

So? How do they pay for increases in executive pay?

With increased revenue. Those workers on the bottom rung ALSO get paid more as they increase their skills and experience. If a company refuses to increase worker pay as the worker increases his value, the worker leaves and goes somewhere that will.

I think what has you confused is the company still has MW jobs that are filled by other workers as the previous ones move up the ladder. So it's not that people are stuck at dirt level wages for a lifetime.

Increased revenue?

Exactly

Revenue generated from frozen wages in your workforce

Frozen wage LEVELS. There's nothing stopping workers from getting raises and promotions. Big difference. You're making it sound like all the workers who start at MW are forever locked into it. They are not.

 

[rightwinger]

Since the last minimum wage increase in 2009, the price of a Big Mac has gone up over a dollar
McDonalds has adjusted their prices to compensate for increased beef prices as well as other inflationary costs. Yet they claim, that raising the minimum wage will put them out of business

View attachment 109953

Ah, so you at least acknowledge that companies would have to raise prices to accommodate for higher wages. That's something a lot of MW advocates won't do. Now the only question is, how much inflation will customers put up with when EVERYTHING they buy costs more? What happens when the advocates for the poor complain that they can no longer afford stuff?

So? How do they pay for increases in executive pay?

With increased revenue. Those workers on the bottom rung ALSO get paid more as they increase their skills and experience. If a company refuses to increase worker pay as the worker increases his value, the worker leaves and goes somewhere that will.

I think what has you confused is the company still has MW jobs that are filled by other workers as the previous ones move up the ladder. So it's not that people are stuck at dirt level wages for a lifetime.

Increased revenue?

Exactly

Revenue generated from frozen wages in your workforce

Frozen wage LEVELS. There's nothing stopping workers from getting raises and promotions. Big difference. You're making it sound like all the workers who start at MW are forever locked into it. They are not.

Um...who cares?

Workers move into vacant management positions (that 15 cents an hour comes in handy). It doesn't mean there are more positions

What we are talking about is the McDonalds WORKFORCE which is comprised predominantly of minimum wage workers
The fact that there is high turnover in that workforce does not excuse not raising wages for eight years

 

[hadit]

Ah, so you at least acknowledge that companies would have to raise prices to accommodate for higher wages. That's something a lot of MW advocates won't do. Now the only question is, how much inflation will customers put up with when EVERYTHING they buy costs more? What happens when the advocates for the poor complain that they can no longer afford stuff?

So? How do they pay for increases in executive pay?

With increased revenue. Those workers on the bottom rung ALSO get paid more as they increase their skills and experience. If a company refuses to increase worker pay as the worker increases his value, the worker leaves and goes somewhere that will.

I think what has you confused is the company still has MW jobs that are filled by other workers as the previous ones move up the ladder. So it's not that people are stuck at dirt level wages for a lifetime.

Increased revenue?

Exactly

Revenue generated from frozen wages in your workforce

Frozen wage LEVELS. There's nothing stopping workers from getting raises and promotions. Big difference. You're making it sound like all the workers who start at MW are forever locked into it. They are not.

Um...who cares?

Workers move into vacant management positions (that 15 cents an hour comes in handy). It doesn't mean there are more positions

Well, duh. Do you think you can legislate more positions?

What we are talking about is the McDonalds WORKFORCE which is comprised predominantly of minimum wage workers
The fact that there is high turnover in that workforce does not excuse not raising wages for eight years

But the workers DO receive higher wages as their value increases. What you apparently object to is the fact that a worker with no skills and no work experience doesn't get paid much until he gets the skills and experience to get higher pay. A starter job at McDonald's is not EXPECTED to pay enough to support a family,, nor should it. If you want ALL jobs to pay that much, you're going to lose a lot of jobs, it's really about that simple. Do you not understand that high turnover in that workforce is a GOOD thing, because it means that workers are getting better jobs elsewhere as they increase their value?

 

[danielpalos]

wages should alway outpace inflation.

If the value of the work outpaces inflation, they do.

It is not the "value" of work ...but what they can force low skilled workers to accept

A job contributes a certain amount of revenue to a company or it doesn't exist. Paying more for that job than the money it generates means the company loses money on it. That's basic economics, and if you force the company to pay too much and it can't raise prices enough to cover the added expense, it will terminate the job entirely.

Companies make profit off of every employee

When the wages of the bulk of their employees gets frozen for eight years, they make even more profit. During that eight year period: The price of supplies, taxes, real estate, advertising, insurance and even executive pay has risen and the companies have adjusted to the market

Yet, when the lowest paid worker in the company wants higher wages....the company claims they will go bankrupt

Okay, let's be logical here.

First, companies make money off the work from every employee or the employee doesn't works for them. That means that if you artificially raise their pay with no corresponding revenue increase, some of them will be added to the "no longer works here" category.

Second, companies are not saying they will go bankrupt if we raise the MW. They're saying they will go bankrupt if we double their labor costs overnight and they can't raise prices high enough to offset the increase. It's a matter of degree.

Third, the employees who made the minimum 8 years ago are not the same employees making the minimum today. If they are, something is wrong, because as you gain skills and experience, you become more valuable. If the company doesn't recognize that increase in value with more pay, you go somewhere that will.

it is why some on the left are advocating for a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and fourteen dollars an hour for unemployment compensation; go ahead, get natural, with Capitalism's, natural rate of unemployment; i dare you.

Henry Ford doubled autoworker wages not minimum wages; why are those naysayers, such slackers? Are they unwilling to practice more, a work ethic from the Age of Iron, along side their more laborious, employees?

don't be lazy; work hard, just like the poor.

 

[hadit]

If the value of the work outpaces inflation, they do.

It is not the "value" of work ...but what they can force low skilled workers to accept

A job contributes a certain amount of revenue to a company or it doesn't exist. Paying more for that job than the money it generates means the company loses money on it. That's basic economics, and if you force the company to pay too much and it can't raise prices enough to cover the added expense, it will terminate the job entirely.

Companies make profit off of every employee

When the wages of the bulk of their employees gets frozen for eight years, they make even more profit. During that eight year period: The price of supplies, taxes, real estate, advertising, insurance and even executive pay has risen and the companies have adjusted to the market

Yet, when the lowest paid worker in the company wants higher wages....the company claims they will go bankrupt

Okay, let's be logical here.

First, companies make money off the work from every employee or the employee doesn't works for them. That means that if you artificially raise their pay with no corresponding revenue increase, some of them will be added to the "no longer works here" category.

Second, companies are not saying they will go bankrupt if we raise the MW. They're saying they will go bankrupt if we double their labor costs overnight and they can't raise prices high enough to offset the increase. It's a matter of degree.

Third, the employees who made the minimum 8 years ago are not the same employees making the minimum today. If they are, something is wrong, because as you gain skills and experience, you become more valuable. If the company doesn't recognize that increase in value with more pay, you go somewhere that will.

it is why some on the left are advocating for a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and fourteen dollars an hour for unemployment compensation; go ahead, get natural, with Capitalism natural rate of unemployment; i dare you.

Henry Ford doubled autoworker wages not minimum wages; why are those naysayers, such slackers? Are they unwilling to practice more, a work ethic from the Age of Iron, along side their more laborious, employees? don't be lazy; work hard, just like the poor.

And now you're spouting the slogans that have been demolished.

 

[rightwinger]

So? How do they pay for increases in executive pay?

With increased revenue. Those workers on the bottom rung ALSO get paid more as they increase their skills and experience. If a company refuses to increase worker pay as the worker increases his value, the worker leaves and goes somewhere that will.

I think what has you confused is the company still has MW jobs that are filled by other workers as the previous ones move up the ladder. So it's not that people are stuck at dirt level wages for a lifetime.

Increased revenue?

Exactly

Revenue generated from frozen wages in your workforce

Frozen wage LEVELS. There's nothing stopping workers from getting raises and promotions. Big difference. You're making it sound like all the workers who start at MW are forever locked into it. They are not.

Um...who cares?

Workers move into vacant management positions (that 15 cents an hour comes in handy). It doesn't mean there are more positions

Well, duh. Do you think you can legislate more positions?

What we are talking about is the McDonalds WORKFORCE which is comprised predominantly of minimum wage workers
The fact that there is high turnover in that workforce does not excuse not raising wages for eight years

But the workers DO receive higher wages as their value increases. What you apparently object to is the fact that a worker with no skills and no work experience doesn't get paid much until he gets the skills and experience to get higher pay. A starter job at McDonald's is not EXPECTED to pay enough to support a family,, nor should it. If you want ALL jobs to pay that much, you're going to lose a lot of jobs, it's really about that simple. Do you not understand that high turnover in that workforce is a GOOD thing, because it means that workers are getting better jobs elsewhere as they increase their value?

But the same PERCENTAGE of the McDonalds workforce remains at a minimum wage that hasn't been raised in eight years

Whether Thelma Lou in Buttfuck Arkansas eventually gets an additional 15 cents an hour as a shift supervisor is irrelevant

 

[danielpalos]

It is not the "value" of work ...but what they can force low skilled workers to accept

A job contributes a certain amount of revenue to a company or it doesn't exist. Paying more for that job than the money it generates means the company loses money on it. That's basic economics, and if you force the company to pay too much and it can't raise prices enough to cover the added expense, it will terminate the job entirely.

Companies make profit off of every employee

When the wages of the bulk of their employees gets frozen for eight years, they make even more profit. During that eight year period: The price of supplies, taxes, real estate, advertising, insurance and even executive pay has risen and the companies have adjusted to the market

Yet, when the lowest paid worker in the company wants higher wages....the company claims they will go bankrupt

Okay, let's be logical here.

First, companies make money off the work from every employee or the employee doesn't works for them. That means that if you artificially raise their pay with no corresponding revenue increase, some of them will be added to the "no longer works here" category.

Second, companies are not saying they will go bankrupt if we raise the MW. They're saying they will go bankrupt if we double their labor costs overnight and they can't raise prices high enough to offset the increase. It's a matter of degree.

Third, the employees who made the minimum 8 years ago are not the same employees making the minimum today. If they are, something is wrong, because as you gain skills and experience, you become more valuable. If the company doesn't recognize that increase in value with more pay, you go somewhere that will.

it is why some on the left are advocating for a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and fourteen dollars an hour for unemployment compensation; go ahead, get natural, with Capitalism natural rate of unemployment; i dare you.

Henry Ford doubled autoworker wages not minimum wages; why are those naysayers, such slackers? Are they unwilling to practice more, a work ethic from the Age of Iron, along side their more laborious, employees? don't be lazy; work hard, just like the poor.

And now you're spouting the slogans that have been demolished.

don't be lazy; work hard, just like the poor.

 

[Skull Pilot]

With increased revenue. Those workers on the bottom rung ALSO get paid more as they increase their skills and experience. If a company refuses to increase worker pay as the worker increases his value, the worker leaves and goes somewhere that will.

I think what has you confused is the company still has MW jobs that are filled by other workers as the previous ones move up the ladder. So it's not that people are stuck at dirt level wages for a lifetime.

Increased revenue?

Exactly

Revenue generated from frozen wages in your workforce

Frozen wage LEVELS. There's nothing stopping workers from getting raises and promotions. Big difference. You're making it sound like all the workers who start at MW are forever locked into it. They are not.

Um...who cares?

Workers move into vacant management positions (that 15 cents an hour comes in handy). It doesn't mean there are more positions

Well, duh. Do you think you can legislate more positions?

What we are talking about is the McDonalds WORKFORCE which is comprised predominantly of minimum wage workers
The fact that there is high turnover in that workforce does not excuse not raising wages for eight years

But the workers DO receive higher wages as their value increases. What you apparently object to is the fact that a worker with no skills and no work experience doesn't get paid much until he gets the skills and experience to get higher pay. A starter job at McDonald's is not EXPECTED to pay enough to support a family,, nor should it. If you want ALL jobs to pay that much, you're going to lose a lot of jobs, it's really about that simple. Do you not understand that high turnover in that workforce is a GOOD thing, because it means that workers are getting better jobs elsewhere as they increase their value?

But the same PERCENTAGE of the McDonalds workforce remains at a minimum wage that hasn't been raised in eight years

Whether Thelma Lou in Buttfuck Arkansas eventually gets an additional 15 cents an hour as a shift supervisor is irrelevant

maybe that's because Mc D's and other entry level jobs have an insanely high turnover rate

 

[Skull Pilot]

A job contributes a certain amount of revenue to a company or it doesn't exist. Paying more for that job than the money it generates means the company loses money on it. That's basic economics, and if you force the company to pay too much and it can't raise prices enough to cover the added expense, it will terminate the job entirely.

Companies make profit off of every employee

When the wages of the bulk of their employees gets frozen for eight years, they make even more profit. During that eight year period: The price of supplies, taxes, real estate, advertising, insurance and even executive pay has risen and the companies have adjusted to the market

Yet, when the lowest paid worker in the company wants higher wages....the company claims they will go bankrupt

Okay, let's be logical here.

First, companies make money off the work from every employee or the employee doesn't works for them. That means that if you artificially raise their pay with no corresponding revenue increase, some of them will be added to the "no longer works here" category.

Second, companies are not saying they will go bankrupt if we raise the MW. They're saying they will go bankrupt if we double their labor costs overnight and they can't raise prices high enough to offset the increase. It's a matter of degree.

Third, the employees who made the minimum 8 years ago are not the same employees making the minimum today. If they are, something is wrong, because as you gain skills and experience, you become more valuable. If the company doesn't recognize that increase in value with more pay, you go somewhere that will.

it is why some on the left are advocating for a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and fourteen dollars an hour for unemployment compensation; go ahead, get natural, with Capitalism natural rate of unemployment; i dare you.

Henry Ford doubled autoworker wages not minimum wages; why are those naysayers, such slackers? Are they unwilling to practice more, a work ethic from the Age of Iron, along side their more laborious, employees? don't be lazy; work hard, just like the poor.

And now you're spouting the slogans that have been demolished.

don't be lazy; work hard, just like the poor.

you mean "the poor" who don't want to work more than 40 hours a week ?

 

[danielpalos]

Companies make profit off of every employee

When the wages of the bulk of their employees gets frozen for eight years, they make even more profit. During that eight year period: The price of supplies, taxes, real estate, advertising, insurance and even executive pay has risen and the companies have adjusted to the market

Yet, when the lowest paid worker in the company wants higher wages....the company claims they will go bankrupt

Okay, let's be logical here.

First, companies make money off the work from every employee or the employee doesn't works for them. That means that if you artificially raise their pay with no corresponding revenue increase, some of them will be added to the "no longer works here" category.

Second, companies are not saying they will go bankrupt if we raise the MW. They're saying they will go bankrupt if we double their labor costs overnight and they can't raise prices high enough to offset the increase. It's a matter of degree.

Third, the employees who made the minimum 8 years ago are not the same employees making the minimum today. If they are, something is wrong, because as you gain skills and experience, you become more valuable. If the company doesn't recognize that increase in value with more pay, you go somewhere that will.

it is why some on the left are advocating for a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and fourteen dollars an hour for unemployment compensation; go ahead, get natural, with Capitalism natural rate of unemployment; i dare you.

Henry Ford doubled autoworker wages not minimum wages; why are those naysayers, such slackers? Are they unwilling to practice more, a work ethic from the Age of Iron, along side their more laborious, employees? don't be lazy; work hard, just like the poor.

And now you're spouting the slogans that have been demolished.

don't be lazy; work hard, just like the poor.

you mean "the poor" who don't want to work more than 40 hours a week ?

no, i mean the "poor" who work by the "sweat of their brow" practicing a work ethic from the Age of Iron.

 

[Skull Pilot]

Okay, let's be logical here.

First, companies make money off the work from every employee or the employee doesn't works for them. That means that if you artificially raise their pay with no corresponding revenue increase, some of them will be added to the "no longer works here" category.

Second, companies are not saying they will go bankrupt if we raise the MW. They're saying they will go bankrupt if we double their labor costs overnight and they can't raise prices high enough to offset the increase. It's a matter of degree.

Third, the employees who made the minimum 8 years ago are not the same employees making the minimum today. If they are, something is wrong, because as you gain skills and experience, you become more valuable. If the company doesn't recognize that increase in value with more pay, you go somewhere that will.

it is why some on the left are advocating for a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and fourteen dollars an hour for unemployment compensation; go ahead, get natural, with Capitalism natural rate of unemployment; i dare you.

Henry Ford doubled autoworker wages not minimum wages; why are those naysayers, such slackers? Are they unwilling to practice more, a work ethic from the Age of Iron, along side their more laborious, employees? don't be lazy; work hard, just like the poor.

And now you're spouting the slogans that have been demolished.

don't be lazy; work hard, just like the poor.

you mean "the poor" who don't want to work more than 40 hours a week ?

no, i mean the "poor" who work by the "sweat of their brow" practicing a work ethic from the Age of Iron.

and just what work ethic is that?

 

[danielpalos]

it is why some on the left are advocating for a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and fourteen dollars an hour for unemployment compensation; go ahead, get natural, with Capitalism natural rate of unemployment; i dare you.

Henry Ford doubled autoworker wages not minimum wages; why are those naysayers, such slackers? Are they unwilling to practice more, a work ethic from the Age of Iron, along side their more laborious, employees? don't be lazy; work hard, just like the poor.

And now you're spouting the slogans that have been demolished.

don't be lazy; work hard, just like the poor.

you mean "the poor" who don't want to work more than 40 hours a week ?

no, i mean the "poor" who work by the "sweat of their brow" practicing a work ethic from the Age of Iron.

and just what work ethic is that?

just lousy reading comprehension from the fantastical, right wing?

by the "sweat of their brow" practicing a work ethic from the Age of Iron.

 

[Skull Pilot]

And now you're spouting the slogans that have been demolished.

don't be lazy; work hard, just like the poor.

you mean "the poor" who don't want to work more than 40 hours a week ?

no, i mean the "poor" who work by the "sweat of their brow" practicing a work ethic from the Age of Iron.

and just what work ethic is that?

just lousy reading comprehension from the fantastical, right wing?

by the "sweat of their brow" practicing a work ethic from the Age of Iron.

that is meaningless.

 

[hadit]

A job contributes a certain amount of revenue to a company or it doesn't exist. Paying more for that job than the money it generates means the company loses money on it. That's basic economics, and if you force the company to pay too much and it can't raise prices enough to cover the added expense, it will terminate the job entirely.

Companies make profit off of every employee

When the wages of the bulk of their employees gets frozen for eight years, they make even more profit. During that eight year period: The price of supplies, taxes, real estate, advertising, insurance and even executive pay has risen and the companies have adjusted to the market

Yet, when the lowest paid worker in the company wants higher wages....the company claims they will go bankrupt

Okay, let's be logical here.

First, companies make money off the work from every employee or the employee doesn't works for them. That means that if you artificially raise their pay with no corresponding revenue increase, some of them will be added to the "no longer works here" category.

Second, companies are not saying they will go bankrupt if we raise the MW. They're saying they will go bankrupt if we double their labor costs overnight and they can't raise prices high enough to offset the increase. It's a matter of degree.

Third, the employees who made the minimum 8 years ago are not the same employees making the minimum today. If they are, something is wrong, because as you gain skills and experience, you become more valuable. If the company doesn't recognize that increase in value with more pay, you go somewhere that will.

it is why some on the left are advocating for a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and fourteen dollars an hour for unemployment compensation; go ahead, get natural, with Capitalism natural rate of unemployment; i dare you.

Henry Ford doubled autoworker wages not minimum wages; why are those naysayers, such slackers? Are they unwilling to practice more, a work ethic from the Age of Iron, along side their more laborious, employees? don't be lazy; work hard, just like the poor.

And now you're spouting the slogans that have been demolished.

don't be lazy; work hard, just like the poor.

You just can't help yourself, can you?