I once remember getting into a disagreement over the definition of the term, Anarchy, with Oddball.
And here you are, also, trying to "define," the undefinable. It is, really, rather ironic.
That a word, that really means, a society with no government, folks want to put a claim on, for what amounts to, political reasons.
I got into a heated argument, with some leftist, on the topic of queer theory, in another thread, so I actually had to go, and read the paper, that the entire movement is based on, again.
And, low and behold, Gayle Rubin actually quotes, Lysander Spooner, right in her landmark paper, that sets the entire agenda for gay-rights and queer theory,
"Thinking Sex: Notes for a Radical Theory of the Politics of Sexuality." So of course, I'm thinking, wtf would Spooner make of THAT, if he were to read it.
The upshot here, is that neither you, nor I, nor Rubin, nor Spooner, nor Oddball, nor Grumblenuts, nor georgephillip, are the ones to tell others they have a "general misunderstanding," about the meaning of anarchy. Oddball was patently offended by the entire term of, "green anarchist." IN his opinion, they want to force others into a green movement & green economy.
I can't say I disagree with him, but then, I have not read enough of their literature to know, what their theory is, as to why they self-organize, to call themselves anarchists. It would be arrogant of me, to tell Derrick Jenson, he has a "general misunderstanding," of anarchism. That's a tenured prof. The point here, is every anarchist, because of the very nature of self-organization, gets to define that word for themselves. . .
. . . sort of like how those gender theorist and post-modernist folks do. . .