What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

McCain Booboo

Annie

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2003
Messages
50,848
Reaction score
4,826
Points
1,790
I read this piece the McCain story this morning, I think this analysis is good. Links to everything...:

http://instapundit.com/archives/032139.php
August 24, 2006

MCCAIN IS BASHING BUSH ON IRAQ, and some people are pretty angry at him for backstabbing.

The substance of McCain's claim is pretty weak: I don't recall Bush ever saying that Iraq would be a "day at the beach," and in fact casualties to date are considerably lower than what was generally expected for the ground war to Baghdad, where you generally heard figures in the 10,000 range. It's more the duration, and the extent of the bad press, that has exceeded expectations, really, though McCain's pretty sensitive to bad press.

But this isn't a "backstab." In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if it were choreographed by Karl Rove. Democrats forget it, but Bush doesn't matter much from the perspective of 2008, and if the GOP can get mileage out of Bush-bashing, it will.

Retrospective Reagan hagiography has obscured this, but in the last couple of years of the Reagan Administration we saw the same thing. Reagan was expendable, since he couldn't be reelected, and with the country tired of the same guy, Republicans (politicians and pundits alike) distanced themselves in order to position for 1988. Bush Sr. ran in 1988, in fact, on an "I'm not like Reagan, but I'll still protect the country unlike those weakling Democrats" platform. Whoever is the GOP nominee in 2008 will do the same, and will be able to do it more obviously because -- unlike George H.W. Bush -- they won't be a sitting Vice President.

To the GOP, Bush is a wasting asset; like Reagan at the same part of his term, he's expendable. They'll use him up, and if the best way to get value out of him over the next couple of years is to bash him, then they will. That's just politics, and McCain's just ahead of the curve. Being ahead of the curve may not be smart, since McCain's biggest weak point is with the Bush base, but I think it's the strategy.

UPDATE: Jim Geraghty has a different reason for being unhappy with McCain.

And McCain sure sounded different in 2003. So did a lot of Democrats who are now criticizing the war, of course, but I don't know if McCain can pull this off.

ANOTHER UPDATE: It's looking like McCain won't be able to pull this off.
posted at 09:07 AM by Glenn Reynolds
 

red states rule

Senior Member
Joined
May 30, 2006
Messages
16,011
Reaction score
573
Points
48
John McCain has one thing in common with John "I served in Viet Nam" Kerry
 

jillian

Princess
Joined
Apr 4, 2006
Messages
85,463
Reaction score
17,710
Points
2,220
Location
The Other Side of Paradise
I read this piece the McCain story this morning, I think this analysis is good. Links to everything...:

http://instapundit.com/archives/032139.php


I'm amazed that he's waited this long to start calling Bush on anything. If I were McCain, I'd have never let slide what Bush's boyz did with regard to his family. But McCain's a politician like everyone else. And now that he's wrecked his chances for any crossover vote, he's putting his tail between his legs and distancing himself from the admin.

Thinking it's Karl Rove orchestrated is just silly.

Though it is kinda funny watching troll boy go off on McCain now. :teeth:
 

red states rule

Senior Member
Joined
May 30, 2006
Messages
16,011
Reaction score
573
Points
48
If McCain is putting his tail between his legs it would be a resume enhancement to the libs.
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$145.00
Goal
$350.00

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top