Mayorkis turned down request for more Trump security detail

Before you get too uppity, Mr. Trudeau backer, try using your head:

1. Impeachment success requires a 2/3 majority.
Never happen with as many Leftist Democrats as are in CONgress.

2. Is Trudeau as "good as it gets" in Canuckistan?

_____________________________
Majority and it happened. You are incorrect as per usual.
 
Trump Is Lucky To Be Alive – I Have Some Questions

Sam Faddis

5–6 minutes



I am not an expert in protective details. I have worked with them extensively in the field. I also have well in excess of thirty years of experience in clandestine operations, both preventing them and carrying them out on enemy soil. From that perspective, let me ask some questions about what happened yesterday in Butler, Pennsylvania when Donald Trump came within a hair’s breadth of being assassinated.

How did the shooter know he could safely and securely occupy the elevated firing position from which he shot? You don’t grab your AR, climb up on top of a roof a little over a hundred yards from a guy under Secret Service protection and hope that you have line of sight, that there is no Secret Service team already on the roof or that you will not be shot by a sniper with overwatch. You KNOW those things before you climb up there.

How?



Share
jjnnjmmm.webp
 
The law does not require biden and mayorkas to provide a fixed number of SS agents
Yes. That is my soft-and-fuzzy understanding of this also.

So long as the Secret Service provided an appropriate number of resources and services, that particular accusation rings hollow.

They did, apparently, fall down on the job, with respect to site-specific threat assessments, but not in allocating resources.
 
Yes. That is my soft-and-fuzzy understanding of this also.

So long as the Secret Service provided an appropriate number of resources and services, that particular accusation rings hollow.

They did, apparently, fall down on the job, with respect to site-specific threat assessments, but not in allocating resources.
Its either DEI or the deep state or the powerful exists and does not care.
 
Yes. That is my soft-and-fuzzy understanding of this also.

So long as the Secret Service provided an appropriate number of resources and services, that particular accusation rings hollow.

They did, apparently, fall down on the job, with respect to site-specific threat assessments, but not in allocating resources.
They did, apparently, fall down on the job, with respect to site-specific threat assessments, but not in allocating resources.

Nice try but, aside from the diversity hire female saying the reason that the SS failed to secure the most obvious security threat location is because climbing on roofs is icky, the backup excuse is to blame the sheriff

And the reason for that is that the SS didnt have enough SS personnel to do it themselves

No matter how you slice it everything still winds up on biden's doorstep for undermanning the security team
 
and ballot stuffing as proven in the movie "2000 Mules."
Even the publisher of that piece admitted it was all a fraud.

Yet you still push it, knowing it's a fraud.

Satan is the Lord of Lies, and you're on your knees servicing him.

And that's why everything you say is inititally assumed to be lie, unless independent evidence shows otherwise. History shows that's the case.
 
They did, apparently, fall down on the job, with respect to site-specific threat assessments, but not in allocating resources.

Nice try but, aside from the diversity hire female saying the reason that the SS failed to secure the most obvious security threat location is because climbing on roofs is icky, the backup excuse is to blame the sheriff

And the reason for that is that the SS didnt have enough SS personnel to do it themselves

No matter how you slice it everything still winds up on biden's doorstep for undermanning the security team
Everything winds up on Biden's doorstep because "The Buck Stops Here", but I see no conscious effort to "undermine" the team.

The only way you win that one is to demonstrate differences in resource allocation... that day vs. historical in 2024.

If you have such evidence feel free to outline it here, and ask for some speaking time in front of Congress.
 
Everything winds up on Biden's doorstep because "The Buck Stops Here", but I see no conscious effort to "undermine" the team.

The only way you win that one is to demonstrate differences in resource allocation... that day vs. historical in 2024.

If you have such evidence feel free to outline it here, and ask for some speaking time in front of Congress.
Wrong

Biden’s SS allowed the shooter to kill one wound three people

The burden of proof is on them not me
 
Yes. That is my soft-and-fuzzy understanding of this also.

So long as the Secret Service provided an appropriate number of resources and services, that particular accusation rings hollow.

They did, apparently, fall down on the job, with respect to site-specific threat assessments, but not in allocating resources.

^^^^^^^^^^^^
Massive backpedaling.
 
Wrong

Biden’s SS allowed the shooter to kill one wound three people

The burden of proof is on them not me
You are the one making the accusation, yes? The burden of proof is on the accuser, yes?
 
You are the one making the accusation, yes? The burden of proof is on the accuser, yes?
My accusation is that one person is dead and three seriously wounded because diversity hire SS flunkies failed to secure a rooftop
 
"What is being discussed is the Democrat conspiracy of four years, and you are trying to avoid that."
------------------------------------------------------

Ummm, hate to correct an OP.

After all, he started the thread in order to spark discussion on the topic of the thread.
That is, the topic of: --(in the OP's words)---"Mayorkis turned down request for more Trump security detail".

So now, in midstream, the OP (ChemEngineer) seemingly changed his mind and now says it ain't Mayorkas and staffing but rather a conspiracy lasting 4years.

Well, damn!
....if the bloke wants to discuss topic B....then don't do a head-fake over topic A.

Duh!!

---------------------------------------------------------------------------



You can join your other Leftist pals on my Ignore List.
...in my humble opinion only wusses, snowflakes, and scaredy-cats put other posters on 'ignore'.

Can't stand the heat in the kitchen? Then go to the gardening forums.

still winds up on biden's doorstep for undermanning the security team
Prove they were 'undermanned' for protecting a fired ex-President.

The guy wasn't even a nominated candidate for office, why should we taxpayers pay more than what previous ex-president have received, and a billionaire doing a vanity political campaign. WTH!

--------------------------------------------------

Biden’s SS allowed the shooter to kill one wound three people
Prove it.
Explain yourself.
"Allowed"? How did they knowingly allow it?
 
30 minutes before the shooting Crooks was seen by the SS carrying a range finder. They did nothing.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom