- May 20, 2009
- 144,197
- 66,493
- 2,330
- Thread starter
- #381
Plymouth Rock.
Still above water since 1620
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Mauna Loa shows that reducing economic Activity has NO EFFECT on CO2
- Thread starter CrusaderFrank
- Start date
Plymouth Rock.
Still above water since 1620
ReinyDays
Gold Member
Wait a second, the vast majority of CO2 dissipates "65% and 80% of CO2 released into the air dissolves into the ocean over a period of 20–200 years." So on average 72% dissaptes in 60 years!!!
Besides, we're still waiting for proof that CO2:
- raises temperature by any measurable amount
- drives the climate
- or that mankind has any measurable impact at all on CO2
Wait ... over half human emitted CO2 disappears within a single year ... it's assumed it's being absorbed by the ocean and converted there into plant material ... great big giant seaweed blobs the size of Arkansas ... but evidence is thin at best, more likely Climate freaks are lying about how much we emit ...
Just a small note, your last claim ... carbon from burnt fossil fuels is different from natural carbon ... and we detect that difference in the atmosphere today ... in fact ... carbon-14 dating has been ruined by burning fossil fuels ... not longer works for accurately dating objects made after say 1900 ...
425 ppm when surrounded by hot glowing lava ...
- May 20, 2009
- 144,197
- 66,493
- 2,330
- Thread starter
- #383
Wait ... over half human emitted CO2 disappears within a single year ... it's assumed it's being absorbed by the ocean and converted there into plant material ... great big giant seaweed blobs the size of Arkansas ... but evidence is thin at best, more likely Climate freaks are lying about how much we emit ...
Just a small note, your last claim ... carbon from burnt fossil fuels is different from natural carbon ... and we detect that difference in the atmosphere today ... in fact ... carbon-14 dating has been ruined by burning fossil fuels ... not longer works for accurately dating objects made after say 1900 ...
425 ppm when surrounded by hot glowing lava ...
I never made the claim that "carbon from burnt fossil fuels is different from natural carbon ... and we detect that difference in the atmosphere today ... in fact ... carbon-14 dating has been ruined by burning fossil fuels ... not longer works for accurately dating objects made after say 1900"
Again, with respect to Moana Loa, that's been the AGW gold Standard for CO2 measurements
ReinyDays
Gold Member
I never made the claim that "carbon from burnt fossil fuels is different from natural carbon ... and we detect that difference in the atmosphere today ... in fact ... carbon-14 dating has been ruined by burning fossil fuels ... not longer works for accurately dating objects made after say 1900"
Again, with respect to Moana Loa, that's been the AGW gold Standard for CO2 measurements
- or that mankind has any measurable impact at all on CO2
The Keeling Curve has been duplicated around the world ... the only reason it's on Mauna Loa is ... welll ... gee ...
... Hawaii ...
Only complete and total MORONS study climate from Chicago ... yes, I'm pointing at physicists ... is Switzerland any better? ... even NASA was smart enough to build in Houston ...
- Dec 18, 2013
- 136,286
- 27,871
- 2,180
Frank, I'd say even further message is that 72% of 120 PPM is now in the water, so now they're saying that adding 34 PPM. So they want us to believe that only 34 PPM of CO2 added to the atmosphere is catastrophic. hahahhahahahahahaahhahahhha.Wait a second, the vast majority of CO2 dissipates "65% and 80% of CO2 released into the air dissolves into the ocean over a period of 20–200 years." So on average 72% dissaptes in 60 years!!!
Besides, we're still waiting for proof that CO2:
- raises temperature by any measurable amount
- drives the climate
- or that mankind has any measurable impact at all on CO2
Again, without any evidence.
ReinyDays
Gold Member
Frank, I'd say even further message is that 72% of 120 PPM is now in the water, so now they're saying that adding 34 PPM. So they want us to believe that only 34 PPM of CO2 added to the atmosphere is catastrophic. hahahhahahahahahaahhahahhha.
Again, without any evidence.
The catastrophe is at the theist mills ... and the CO2 is being turned into plant proteins ... ocean acidification due to the build up of ... [giggle] ... DNA ...
but bu tbu tbu tbu tbubt
tenth's of a degree ... should I soil my knickers? ...
No link means you're full of shit ...
His desire to exempt himself from the scientific method, and which I provided links for, says I'm not.
Dumbfuck.
Sunsettommy
Diamond Member
- Mar 19, 2018
- 14,892
- 12,526
- 2,400
No link means you're full of shit ...
It was a very easy challenge for you to answer yet you failed.... badly.
Sunsettommy
Diamond Member
- Mar 19, 2018
- 14,892
- 12,526
- 2,400
Again, many here keeps forgetting how rapid CO2 is being cycled by biota.
===
NASA
Apr 26, 2016
Excerpt:
From a quarter to half of Earth’s vegetated lands has shown significant greening over the last 35 years largely due to rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, according to a new study published in the journal Nature Climate Change on April 25.
An international team of 32 authors from 24 institutions in eight countries led the effort, which involved using satellite data from NASA’s Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer instruments to help determine the leaf area index, or amount of leaf cover, over the planet’s vegetated regions. The greening represents an increase in leaves on plants and trees equivalent in area to two times the continental United States.
LINK
Red bolding mine
=====
Warmist/alarmists thinks added CO2 takes a very long time to be recycled out of the air while NASA study shows it recycles rather rapidly.
===
NASA
Apr 26, 2016
Carbon Dioxide Fertilization Greening Earth, Study Finds
Excerpt:
From a quarter to half of Earth’s vegetated lands has shown significant greening over the last 35 years largely due to rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, according to a new study published in the journal Nature Climate Change on April 25.
An international team of 32 authors from 24 institutions in eight countries led the effort, which involved using satellite data from NASA’s Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer instruments to help determine the leaf area index, or amount of leaf cover, over the planet’s vegetated regions. The greening represents an increase in leaves on plants and trees equivalent in area to two times the continental United States.
LINK
Red bolding mine
=====
Warmist/alarmists thinks added CO2 takes a very long time to be recycled out of the air while NASA study shows it recycles rather rapidly.
- May 20, 2009
- 144,197
- 66,493
- 2,330
- Thread starter
- #390
Not sure how much clearer is can be that human activity has NO EFFECT on CO2 which in turn has no ability to drive temperature and climate on planet Earth
It’s almost as if Internal Combustion Engines congregate in the forests to spew their planet killing CO2
- May 20, 2009
- 144,197
- 66,493
- 2,330
- Thread starter
- #391
It’s almost as if Internal Combustion Engines congregate in the forests to spew their planet killing CO2
Why do Internal Combustion Engines congregate in Equatorial rain forests?
Attachments
The Keeling Curve is atmosphere only.Frank, I'd say even further message is that 72% of 120 PPM is now in the water, so now they're saying that adding 34 PPM. So they want us to believe that only 34 PPM of CO2 added to the atmosphere is catastrophic. hahahhahahahahahaahhahahhha.
Again, without any evidence.
- Dec 18, 2013
- 136,286
- 27,871
- 2,180
So now you’re saying that there’s 72% more CO2 than what’s in the air?The Keeling Curve is atmosphere only.
Hahaha
The science says all sorts of things. You should read some of it sometime.So now you’re saying that there’s 72% more CO2 than what’s in the air?
Hahaha
- Dec 18, 2013
- 136,286
- 27,871
- 2,180
I have, Frank posted it. Then you posted nonsense as an argumentThe science says all sorts of things. You should read some of it sometime.
ReinyDays
Gold Member
His desire to exempt himself from the scientific method, and which I provided links for, says I'm not.
Dumbfuck.
No links ... just mass media ... those folks are entitled to their opinions, even if they don't understand the subject material ...
You're claiming there's a published scientific paper that contains an experiment that cannot be duplicated ... I'd like a link to that scientific paper ... maybe from a publishing house you respect ... not sure why you don't like Sausalito Scientific Publishing Company ... first choice among Grateful Dead fans and folks who've taken too much LSD in their lives ...
Oh wait ...I see you're down to your ad hominum attacks again ... fucking loser ...
No links ... just mass media ... those folks are entitled to their opinions, even if they don't understand the subject material ...
You're claiming there's a published scientific paper that contains an experiment that cannot be duplicated ... I'd like a link to that scientific paper ... maybe from a publishing house you respect ... not sure why you don't like Sausalito Scientific Publishing Company ... first choice among Grateful Dead fans and folks who've taken too much LSD in their lives ...
Oh wait ...I see you're down to your ad hominum attacks again ... fucking loser ...
Links were provided little dope.
You lose.
ReinyDays
Gold Member
Links were provided little dope.
You lose.
From the National Enquirer? ... too funny ...
From the National Enquirer? ... too funny ...
No, that's your speed. I provided links to specific papers.
Looks like you're too dumb to figure that out.
ReinyDays
Gold Member
No, that's your speed. I provided links to specific papers.
Looks like you're too dumb to figure that out.
No ... just the CNN article ... I dare you to repeat your scientific links ...
Similar threads
- Replies
- 95
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 25
- Views
- 407
- Replies
- 43
- Views
- 459
- Replies
- 261
- Views
- 3K
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8032
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 468
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-