Evolutionists have volumes and volumes of loosely related facts. They have not demonstrated evolution. They have demonstrated selective breeding. But they have not bred, say two dogs and made a different species (even with a 'blended' chromosome). The scientist was right: if a theory is to be 'proven', you must be able to 'predict' and 'replicate' it. "Evolutionists" have never been able to do that.
You cannot have a conversation with them; it is their 'faith'. They believe it, and no amount of 'reasoning' will make them look at it any other way.
Creationists believe (their faith) that there is a supreme being, that designed the world we live in and most of the life forms (go to Enoch for the dinosaurs and mythological animals).
Neither one can 'absolutely' prove their 'theory'. One belief brings peace of mind. The other leaves you hollow and wanting. In this country (up to this point), you can choose your belief for yourself. There is only one set of 'believers' that want to silence the others' views. Can you guess which?
You cannot have a conversation with them; it is their 'faith'. They believe it, and no amount of 'reasoning' will make them look at it any other way.
Creationists believe (their faith) that there is a supreme being, that designed the world we live in and most of the life forms (go to Enoch for the dinosaurs and mythological animals).
Neither one can 'absolutely' prove their 'theory'. One belief brings peace of mind. The other leaves you hollow and wanting. In this country (up to this point), you can choose your belief for yourself. There is only one set of 'believers' that want to silence the others' views. Can you guess which?