Massive Obama-Backed “One Nation” Rally...

[Samson]

And yet from where I sit, a lot of European countries (and NZ and Oz for that matter) are a lot freer than you guys...
..go figure....

European countries? Explain what is NZ and Oz

If I have to explain it to you, there's no point continuing....

Oz is south of New Zealand, I believe.

Its not in Kansas anymore.

 

[Dr Grump]

European countries? Explain what is NZ and Oz

If I have to explain it to you, there's no point continuing....

Oz is south of New Zealand, I believe.

Its not in Kansas anymore.

It's west. We call it the Western Isle....

 

[bigrebnc1775]

And yet from where I sit, a lot of European countries (and NZ and Oz for that matter) are a lot freer than you guys...
..go figure....

European countries? Explain what is NZ and Oz

If I have to explain it to you, there's no point continuing....

Humor me what was your meaning when you said NZ and OZ?

 

[Samson]

European countries? Explain what is NZ and Oz

If I have to explain it to you, there's no point continuing....

Humor me what was your meaning when you said NZ and OZ?

NZ = New Zealand, land of the Kiwi, a sheep/grape hybid.

OZ =

The Land of Oz; note that the map is a mirror image of "actual" locations, but that the compass rose shows east on the right-hand side

 

[bigrebnc1775]

If I have to explain it to you, there's no point continuing....

Humor me what was your meaning when you said NZ and OZ?

NZ = New Zealand, land of the Kiwi, a sheep/grape hybid.

OZ =

The Land of Oz; note that the map is a mirror image of "actual" locations, but that the compass rose shows east on the right-hand side

Thaanks I know what the OZ part was but was wondering about the NZ. Nopw I don't think NZ is in Europe like it was suggested.

 

[Samson]

Humor me what was your meaning when you said NZ and OZ?

NZ = New Zealand, land of the Kiwi, a sheep/grape hybid.

OZ =

The Land of Oz; note that the map is a mirror image of "actual" locations, but that the compass rose shows east on the right-hand side

Thaanks I know what the OZ part was but was wondering about the NZ. Nopw I don't think NZ is in Europe like it was suggested.

NZ isn't in Europe?

Where the **** is it?

 

[thereisnospoon]

NZ = New Zealand, land of the Kiwi, a sheep/grape hybid.

OZ =

The Land of Oz; note that the map is a mirror image of "actual" locations, but that the compass rose shows east on the right-hand side

Thaanks I know what the OZ part was but was wondering about the NZ. Nopw I don't think NZ is in Europe like it was suggested.

NZ isn't in Europe?

Where the **** is it?

It's in Kansas.

 

[Charles_Main]

nz = new zealand, land of the kiwi, a sheep/grape hybid.

Oz =

the land of oz; note that the map is a mirror image of "actual" locations, but that the compass rose shows east on the right-hand side

thaanks i know what the oz part was but was wondering about the nz. Nopw i don't think nz is in europe like it was suggested.

nz isn't in europe?

Where the **** is it?

down under!!

 

[Samson]

thaanks i know what the oz part was but was wondering about the nz. Nopw i don't think nz is in europe like it was suggested.

nz isn't in europe?

Where the **** is it?

down under!!

Under......ground?

Morlocks

 

[Foxfyre]

Thaanks I know what the OZ part was but was wondering about the NZ. Nopw I don't think NZ is in Europe like it was suggested.

NZ isn't in Europe?

Where the **** is it?

It's in Kansas.

Not any more.

 

[Samson]

NZ isn't in Europe?

Where the **** is it?

It's in Kansas.

Not any more.

Did it blow away?

 

[Dr Grump]

European countries? Explain what is NZ and Oz

If I have to explain it to you, there's no point continuing....

Humor me what was your meaning when you said NZ and OZ?

Oz is Oztralia...

And I didn't say it was in Europe...in fact, I said the opposite if you understand context..

 

[Big Fitz]

Right...They changed to freeholds, moved away from socialism and everything worked out just fine.

Insofar as the republic of 1786 is concerned, it was designed to be as far removed form socialistic central control as humanly possible.

Ahh yes. Socialism. The government that almost killed off every single colony it was tried in. Abandoned inside of three years after every attempt... unless they died first.

 

[Samson]

If I have to explain it to you, there's no point continuing....

Humor me what was your meaning when you said NZ and OZ?

Oz is Oztralia...

And I didn't say it was in Europe...in fact, I said the opposite if you understand context..

Oztralia?


Is that where they grow ozaleas?

 

[Synthaholic]

Capitalism is the natural law of economics. It's what happens when the government isn't controlling the economy. In a free society, it's what will naturally happen.

I don't understand why this is so difficult to understand for some people.

It's not difficult to understand at all. Doesn't change the fact that Capitalism isn't in the Constitution. If someone is a Socialist, that does not make them anti-American.

Not anti American no, but often in conflict with the Constitution for sure.

His point is valid. Capitalism does not have to be in the constitution. Because the Constitution was set up to limit government control over Everything. Including the markets. Which implies Capitalism.

Perhaps. Doesn't change the truthfulness of what I said: capitalism is not mandated, suggested, or mentioned in the U.S. Constitution. Therefore, it is not un-American or anti-American to espouse a different system.

I believe that, for instance, high-speed internet should be a regulated utility, like the city electric or the county cooperative. Because it has become essential to a forward-moving society, like running water and electricity. Some on this board would say that's Socialism. But who cares, if it is the correct move in order to compete with other countries?

 

[Meister]

It's not difficult to understand at all. Doesn't change the fact that Capitalism isn't in the Constitution. If someone is a Socialist, that does not make them anti-American.

Not anti American no, but often in conflict with the Constitution for sure.

His point is valid. Capitalism does not have to be in the constitution. Because the Constitution was set up to limit government control over Everything. Including the markets. Which implies Capitalism.

Perhaps. Doesn't change the truthfulness of what I said: capitalism is not mandated, suggested, or mentioned in the U.S. Constitution. Therefore, it is not un-American or anti-American to espouse a different system.

I believe that, for instance, high-speed internet should be a regulated utility, like the city electric or the county cooperative. Because it has become essential to a forward-moving society. Some on this board would say that's Socialism. But who cares, if it is the correct move in order to compete with other countries?

Thank God that our country allows you to have your own opinion....even though it's not shared by most.

 

[Synthaholic]

Not anti American no, but often in conflict with the Constitution for sure.

His point is valid. Capitalism does not have to be in the constitution. Because the Constitution was set up to limit government control over Everything. Including the markets. Which implies Capitalism.

Perhaps. Doesn't change the truthfulness of what I said: capitalism is not mandated, suggested, or mentioned in the U.S. Constitution. Therefore, it is not un-American or anti-American to espouse a different system.

I believe that, for instance, high-speed internet should be a regulated utility, like the city electric or the county cooperative. Because it has become essential to a forward-moving society. Some on this board would say that's Socialism. But who cares, if it is the correct move in order to compete with other countries?

Thank God that our country allows you to have your own opinion....even though it's not shared by most.

So you think we are Socialists because we have regulated city utilities and regulated city water treatment plants?

 

[Meister]

Perhaps. Doesn't change the truthfulness of what I said: capitalism is not mandated, suggested, or mentioned in the U.S. Constitution. Therefore, it is not un-American or anti-American to espouse a different system.

I believe that, for instance, high-speed internet should be a regulated utility, like the city electric or the county cooperative. Because it has become essential to a forward-moving society. Some on this board would say that's Socialism. But who cares, if it is the correct move in order to compete with other countries?

Thank God that our country allows you to have your own opinion....even though it's not shared by most.

So you think we are Socialists because we have regulated city utilities and regulated city water treatment plants?

Please show me where I said that. I said: Thank God that our country allows you to have your own opinion....even though it's not shared by most. You do a lousy job of trying to project what I said.

 

[Samson]

It's not difficult to understand at all. Doesn't change the fact that Capitalism isn't in the Constitution. If someone is a Socialist, that does not make them anti-American.

Not anti American no, but often in conflict with the Constitution for sure.

His point is valid. Capitalism does not have to be in the constitution. Because the Constitution was set up to limit government control over Everything. Including the markets. Which implies Capitalism.

Perhaps. Doesn't change the truthfulness of what I said: capitalism is not mandated, suggested, or mentioned in the U.S. Constitution. Therefore, it is not un-American or anti-American to espouse a different system.

The National Football League isn't mentioned in the US Constitution.

Therefore, it is not Un-american or anti-American to expouse watching Cricket during the Superbowl.

It's just stupid.

 

[taichiliberal]

The only ones who have distorted the truth about this rally are those who started the rally. Anyone with any ammount of common sense knows that one nation main supporters are communist socialist and marxist.



Just look at the one nation web page and group supporters.



And another thing from their own words they are a liar
We are conservatives and moderates, progressives and liberals, non-believers and people of deep faith, united by escalating assaults on our reason, our environment, and our rights.
Mission | One Nation Working Together

One Nation Working Together

You're not too bright, are you? Guys like you keep thinking that your opinions, speculations, suppositions and conjecture are the equivalent of facts and logic (hint: they are not).

I mean, there's a LIST of the attendees....the Socialist and Marxists are NOT the major players. Add to that the FACT that YOU cannot provide any fact based proof of what you assert, from the source material of the actual website, and you're just blowing smoke as usual. Next time, think it through before you embarass yourself.

You're not too bright, are you?

Famous last words of all liberals that just got this ass kicked in a debate.

Guys like you keep thinking that your opinions, speculations, suppositions and conjecture are the equivalent of facts and logic

Let's see what did I say for you to think I was spectulating

The only ones who have distorted the truth about this rally are those who started the rally. Anyone with any ammount of common sense knows that one nation main supporters are communist socialist and marxist.

I guess you are lacking common sense because all you have to do is look at the groups involved with one nation.

Nothing else that you posted is worth repling to because you have proven yourself lacking in common sense and I hate to beat up mentally challenged pricks

This is why no one truly takes you seriously....you keep repeating an assertion that you have YET to logically and factually prove in print. As I've told you before, your repetition does not a truism make....a lesson you either cannot comprehend or you stubbornly refuse to acknowledge.

There's a LIST of the attendees from the home website for the coordination of the rally....the Socialist and Marxists are NOT the major players. Add to that the FACT that YOU cannot provide any fact based proof of what you assert, from the source material of the actual website, and you're just blowing smoke as usual. SHOW US THE STATS, THE ACTUAL COMPARISON OF FINANCIAL DONATIONS, OR LOGISTICS SUPPORT...ANYTHING THAT WILL CORROBORATE YOUR CLAIM, and you might have an argument. Remember, YOU made the claim, the burden of proof is on YOU.

But I suspect you'll just BS, bluff, dodge and bluster like the Big Reb windbag that you are. Carry on.