Massie has a great idea for getting the names of miscreants out there from the Epstein files

[Delldude]

I see....you are no longer interested in the Epstein files since there is very incriminating evidence against Trump.

List it then.

 

[Alicia J]

Go read the law for yourself..........it's only three pages..............

So you've got nothing. Of course.

 

[Delldude]

So you've got nothing. Of course.

You shouldn't opine on things you haven't a clue what you're talking about.

 

[Alicia J]

List it then.

Trump apparently getting a blow job from a 13 year old girl. The FBI interviewed the woman 4 times in 2019. The FBI doesn't do that unless the witness is credible.

Ted Lieu (D-CA) also mentioned to Bondi during that Congressional hearing a couple of weeks ago about an allegation reported to the FBI that Trump and Epstein had a girl killed in Oklahoma in order to keep her mouth shut about a rape allegation. You can watch it.

This was such a vicious takedown of Bondi by Lieu that it might be one of the reasons that she was fired today. --

 

[Delldude]

Trump apparently getting a blow job from a 13 year old girl. The FBI interviewed the woman 4 times in 2019. The FBI doesn't do that unless the witness is credible.

You overlook the part where she sat down after the third interview and was asked if she would make an audio of all her allegations, she shit her pants, said she's think about it and never contacted FBI again.Suddenly her lawsuits were dropped also.

 

[Alicia J]

You overlook the part where she sat down after the third interview and was asked if she would make an audio of all her allegations, she shit her pants, said she's think about it and never contacted FBI again.Suddenly her lawsuits were dropped also.

Trump was President, she was probably scared to death. I don't blame her.

 

[jacksonlamb]

Go read the law for yourself..........it's only three pages..............

cry and deny

 

[Delldude]

Trump was President, she was probably scared to death. I don't blame her.

It was about raising her right hand. The scared to death was bullshit.

 

[leftwinger]

//why deep state Thune stalled the very weak SAVE act. This is what they want in NOV. Do we the people get a say in it? In the streets?//

“Then they’re gonna start going after you. Then they’re gonna start figuring out where all the money stolen is.”

“Then they’re gonna go after your stupid jackass kids and their spouses and all the other bullshit that you see. And they’re gonna investigate the shit out of you.”

“And then when it comes to this stuff you’re doing in Iran, I gotta tell you, you’re getting really, really, really close to war crimes here. You’re probably going to cross the line.”

“And the one thing that Democrats are going to insist on in the 2028 election is that if you’re indicted by the international courts, and I think it’s in The Hague or somewhere in the Netherlands, we’re not going to protect your ass…not going to protect you.”

“Understand that.”

 

[Alicia J]

You shouldn't opine on things you haven't a clue what you're talking about.

Just tell me what, besides victims' names, can't be released? And what the hell does that have to do with Trump's name being redacted in direct violation of the Epstein Transparency Act?

Since you can't answer either question, you are just here to troll. Probably like every day for you.

 

[leftwinger]

It was about raising her right hand. The scared to death was bullshit.

These newcomer children Sock wouldn't know the truth if it crawled up their shorts and took a bite. They dont care. Their leaders don't care for truth. Its ingrained.

 

[Rawley]

More stupid lying and trolling. The only parts that can't be released are the names of the victims. Obviously, that doesn't include worthless Trump.

LOL Someone took a peek at the law. Go back and read the rest of it see what else can be withheld. You might also look to see what documents they ask for - which also defines which documents that they do not want produced.

Several Congressmen have seen the unredacted files. Jamie Raskin said Trump's name appeared more than 1 million times when he performed a search on DOJ's computer. --


This is easily verifiable by any member of Congress with access to the Epstein files, so I'm sure Raskin is telling the truth.

https://www.axios.com/2026/02/10/trump-epstein-files-jamie-raskin-unredacted

Raskin? You must be kidding.

 

[Alicia J]

These newcomer children Sock wouldn't know the truth if it crawled up their shorts and took a bite. They dont care. Their leaders don't care for truth. Its ingrained.

It's obvious you don't care about the truth. You can't explain why Trump's name is redacted thousands of times in the Epstein files, in direct violation of the Epstein Transparency Act.

You can't explain why Ghislaine Maxwell, one of the worst pedophiles in U.S. history, is now chilling in a minimum security prison thanks to Trump.

 

[Alicia J]

LOL Someone took a peek at the law. Go back and read the rest of it see what else can be withheld. You might also look to see what documents they ask for - which also defines which documents that they do not want produced.

Or you can just tell me. It's obvious you are just BS'ing because you lost...again.

Raskin? You must be kidding.

Any Republican in Congress with access to the Epstein files is welcome to do a search for Trump's name on the DOJ's computer and prove that Raskin is lying. They haven't.

You've obviously got nothing but trolling.

 

[The Irish Ram]

Ask Sleepy Joe to let you borrow his copy...

 

[Delldude]

Since you can't answer either question, you are just here to troll.

I already answered your question and you told it is spelled out specifically in the law which, if you are so clueless about, you should educate yourself and look it up.
If you're willing to go into a debate arguing about something you're not knowledgeable about is quite embarrassing.

I feel so sorry for you.....

It was about raising her right hand. The scared to death was bullshit.

She said something to the FBI to the effect that doing an audio probably wouldn't do any good and nothing would be done about it anyway.

Didn't want to swear to her allegations.

 

[Alicia J]

I already answered your question and you told it is spelled out specifically in the law which, if you are so clueless about, you should educate yourself and look it up.
If you're willing to go into a debate arguing about something you're not knowledgeable about is quite embarrassing.

I feel so sorry for you.....

So this is why Bondi was destroyed by members of Congress during her testimony a couple of weeks ago? Because the members of Congress don't understand the new law that they wrote?

You've obviously got nothing but pathetic MAGA trolling. How boring.

 

[Delldude]

So this is why Bondi was destroyed by members of Congress during her testimony a couple of weeks ago? Because the members of Congress don't understand the new law that they wrote?

You've obviously got nothing but pathetic MAGA trolling. How boring.

Your diversion from the topic at hand is noted.

Still can't effectively comment on either of the points I've made.......

Trolling? You looked in a mirror lately?

 

[Alicia J]

Your diversion from the topic at hand is noted.

Still can't effectively comment on either of the points I've made.......

Trolling? You looked in a mirror lately?

You didn't make a point. You simply are not smart enough to.

Your only purpose here is to troll.

 

[Delldude]

You didn't make a point. You simply are not smart enough to.

Your only purpose here is to troll.

LOL.... been a member here for 13 days spreading lies and misinformation and call long term members trolls without supporting any of your allegations with facts.

Your talking points are failing you.