Massie has a great idea for getting the names of miscreants out there from the Epstein files

[jc456]

Massie is beginning to sound like the guy who wants to act like they want to fight but keeps yelling to hold them back. Then, nobody's really in front of them, but they still don't come forward and attack. At this point, don't talk about it, be about it.

I think that there's nothing more that can be done at this point to clear Trump's name being connected to the activities at Epstein's island or anywhere else with young women in connection with Epstein. If there are no known victims claiming he was involved, pictures, flight logs, or anything that directly links Trump to Epstein's activities anywhere will be met with the response that the DOJ is either hiding the evidence or it was destroyed to protect him. No proof is proof of a coverup. People are trying to make this the "Russian collusion" of his first term. If you think that he wasn't involved, I don't know why y'all continually engage with those who think he is. Just a waste of time in my opinion.

I think you're wrong, we have the victims and they cleared trump. Now demonuts need to provide their evidence they keep standing behind. I mean, they are the ones shouting they know.

 

[Billiejeens]

Hopefully. We'll see how it goes. I'm only about 50/50 on whether our country will survive Trump.

Hopefully President Vance or President Rubio will take over a much improved USA.

 

[Billiejeens]

Thank you for making it so clear that your defense of Massie is just another symptom of your trump derangement - nothing to do with any supposed conservative views that you hold and definitely nothing to do with any conservative policy goals that Massey has brought to fruition.

Massie has literally never accomplished anything.
He just leads these phucks farther into obscurity.

 

[Seymour Flops]

I have read that Rep. Thomas Massie says he has a major move in mind regarding the Epstein files.

He stated that if the Department of Justice, under Pam Bondi, does not release unredacted names linked to Epstein, he could take the issue to the House floor and read the names publicly under congressional immunity.

Under that protection, such statements would be part of the official Congressional Record.

Rep. Thomas Massie says he has a major move in mind regarding the Epstein files.
He stated that if the Department of Justice, under Pam Bondi, does not release unredacted names linked to Epstein, he could take the issue to the House floor and read the names publicly under congressional immunity.
Under that protection, such statements would be part of the official Congressional Record.

This is genius.

In the Yahoo News report, Massie states that he is willing to use the constitutional protections afforded to members of Congress to “publicly read a list of Epstein’s clients” that is being compiled by victims. This is a direct acknowledgment that he may release names on the House floor, where he cannot be prosecuted or sued for doing so.

Members of Congress are protected by the Speech and Debate Clause of the U.S. Constitution.This means:

• They cannot be prosecuted for statements made during official legislative activity.
• They cannot be sued for defamation for what they say on the floor.
• They can introduce documents into the Congressional Record with legal immunity.

So if Massie chose to read names aloud, he would be shielded from legal consequences.

What is your proof that all of them are "miscreants?"

 

[YoursTruly]

^^^^^^^ The sucking sound

 

[PeanutGallery]

I think you're wrong, we have the victims and they cleared trump. Now demonuts need to provide their evidence they keep standing behind. I mean, they are the ones shouting they know.

The fact of the matter is that, to them, they don't care that actual victims have come out and said that they didn't have any interaction with Trump or see Trump do anything. It doesn't matter that there's no record of him ever visiting his island. I mean, remember all the "evidence" they produced of Russian collusion. The "pied pipers" have given their message out, and the "faithful cult members" are going to believe it regardless. I agree with you that if they're going to continue portraying Trump this way, they need to produce some actual receipts. However, you know and I know that pigs will fly, the Eagles fans will start liking the Cowboys, and AOC will be become a republican before any relevant evidence will see the light of day.

 

[YoursTruly]

The fact of the matter is that, to them, they don't care that actual victims have come out and said that they didn't have any interaction with Trump or see Trump do anything. It doesn't matter that there's no record of him ever visiting his island. I mean, remember all the "evidence" they produced of Russian collusion. The "pied pipers" have given their message out, and the "faithful cult members" are going to believe it regardless. I agree with you that if they're going to continue portraying Trump this way, they need to produce some actual receipts. However, you know and I know that pigs will fly, the Eagles fans will start liking the Cowboys, and AOC will be become a republican before any relevant evidence will see the light of day.

The island isn't the only place the rapes and child molesting took place. It happened at Florida and NYC too. Along with the ranch in New Mexico.

Trump didn't have to go to the island.

 

[pknopp]

The island isn't the only place the rapes and child molesting took place. It happened at Florida and NYC too. Along with the ranch in New Mexico.

Trump didn't have to go to the island.

And it doesn't matter whether Trump did anything.

Release all the information.

 

[dblack]

And it doesn't matter whether Trump did anything.

Release all the information.

That's the thing. The Dems fixation on "getting" Trump is actually hindering attempts to find out what Epstein was up to - who was compromised and who was pulling the strings. THAT's what's being covered up. And it's a signifiicant national security risk.

 

[pknopp]

That's the thing. The Dems fixation on "getting" Trump is actually hindering attempts to find out what Epstein was up to - who was compromised and who was pulling the strings. THAT's what's being covered up. And it's a signifiicant national security risk.

Nothing is stopping Trump from simply releasing everything.

 

[dblack]

Nothing is stopping Trump from simply releasing everything.

Trump's said it might hurt his "friends". Not sure what that means.

 

[pknopp]

Trump's said it might hurt his "friends". Not sure what that means.

Not a good look.

 

[PeanutGallery]

The island isn't the only place the rapes and child molesting took place. It happened at Florida and NYC too. Along with the ranch in New Mexico.

Trump didn't have to go to the island.

Do you have ANY evidence from anywhere or any person that has come out that places Trump doing anything with Epstein in NYC, NM, or Florida? No, you don't. That's why people are crying about "releasing all the files" because they're hoping and praying that something gets found that they can point at Trump and say, "Gotcha!!" You want to waste your time acting like Linus from "It's the Great Pumpkin, Charlie Brown" hoping that the "Great Pumpkin" (Massie or something else) is going to give you this "evidence" about Trump? Go ahead. There are things about Trump that one can actually criticize Trump that has substance. This looks like nothing more than a fishing expedition for those who don't like Trump.

 

[pknopp]

Do you have ANY evidence from anywhere or any person that has come out that places Trump doing anything with Epstein in NYC, NM, or Florida? No, you don't. That's why people are crying about "releasing all the files" because they're hoping and praying that something gets found that they can point at Trump and say, "Gotcha!!" You want to waste your time acting like Linus from "It's the Great Pumpkin, Charlie Brown" hoping that the "Great Pumpkin" (Massie or something else) is going to give you this "evidence" about Trump? Go ahead. There are things about Trump that one can actually criticize Trump that has substance. This looks like nothing more than a fishing expedition for those who don't like Trump.

any?

New Evidence Corroborates Claims of Trump Sex Accuser, 13

A new investigation has backed up evidence given by a woman who has accused Donald Trump of sexually abusing her when she was 13, according to a report. The woman conducted four interviews with the FB...

www.yahoo.com

 

[PeanutGallery]

any?

New Evidence Corroborates Claims of Trump Sex Accuser, 13

A new investigation has backed up evidence given by a woman who has accused Donald Trump of sexually abusing her when she was 13, according to a report. The woman conducted four interviews with the FB...

www.yahoo.com

You're running with this? From your link.

The woman’s claims of assault against Epstein, Trump, and Atkins remain unproven, while no direct evidence backing up the alleged crimes has been uncovered.

Because we KNOW that women wouldn't make false allegations against someone political, right? I believe two of the accusers of Kavanaugh came out and said that they made up their allegations against him. So, in your opinion, would that mean that Tara Reade was telling the truth about Biden before the 2020 election? That would be a shame for a party who were the ones who said "believe all women" cast that aside just to get Trump out of the White House.

 

[pknopp]

You're running with this? From your link.

The woman’s claims of assault against Epstein, Trump, and Atkins remain unproven, while no direct evidence backing up the alleged crimes has been uncovered.

You asked if there was "any" evidence. If you don't want a question answered, don't ask it.

 

[leftwinger]

That's the thing. The Dems fixation on "getting" Trump is actually hindering attempts to find out what Epstein was up to - who was compromised and who was pulling the strings. THAT's what's being covered up. And it's a signifiicant national security risk.

And presto that's wher you fence squatting parrots congregate playing the phony middle. Parroting your new line "but you're worried", over and over.

Nobody is worried about more phony BS documents slipped into ten million pages with another false story on Trump typed up.

You've had your TDS time to get him. There is no there there or it would be out long long ago. The HO concurr.

Everthing is better in the USA and heading the right way despite useless TDS vermin and deep state slowdown hindrance. The next guy can pick it up more easily than complete Obiden catastrophe stealing or wasting Trillions.

 

[Billiejeens]

Do you have ANY evidence from anywhere or any person that has come out that places Trump doing anything with Epstein in NYC, NM, or Florida? No, you don't. That's why people are crying about "releasing all the files" because they're hoping and praying that something gets found that they can point at Trump and say, "Gotcha!!" You want to waste your time acting like Linus from "It's the Great Pumpkin, Charlie Brown" hoping that the "Great Pumpkin" (Massie or something else) is going to give you this "evidence" about Trump? Go ahead. There are things about Trump that one can actually criticize Trump that has substance. This looks like nothing more than a fishing expedition for those who don't like Trump.

No one has any.
There is none.

If there was a scintilla of evidence it would have been used to stop Trump from returning to the Oval Office.

 

[Billiejeens]

You asked if there was "any" evidence. If you don't want a question answered, don't ask it.

That's not evidnce.

 

[leftwinger]

You asked if there was "any" evidence. If you don't want a question answered, don't ask it.

I don't bother to open it. That's the one the deep state sent out two days after he announced 2024 candidacy. Shot down by Obidens FBI long ago. But the DNC deep state R keep recycling it.