YoursTruly
Platinum Member
- Dec 21, 2019
- 13,541
- 9,271
- 1,140
It's always a thing.
He was being sarcastic....... You know that, right?
Right?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's always a thing.
So there are no more unredacted names to expose? Why is your cult still chanting "RELEASE ALL THE FILES?"
/——/ There are innocent people who had nothing to do with the Island. Their lives would be ruined. Not that you care. It’s all about Orange Man Bad.
Not so. You do not know the law or DOJ policy.
So there are no more unredacted names to expose? Why is your cult still chanting "RELEASE ALL THE FILES?"
Victim names? Nothing to do with Epstein? On going investigations? National Security?
BullshitThe DoJ also didn't allow all the unredacted names when congressmen were allowed in the DoJ. They're still hiding names from Congress.
Thanks for the honesty. No matter what they release, you will go to your grave chanting "RELEASE ALL THE FILES"More names that need to be redacted? How would we know if they're still being hidden.
Which is the point.
Ive seen little to say anyone has been destroyed that has been mentioned that have a legitimate reason.
six million docs Zippy, 6,000,000If we have to hide the rape of young girls to protect national security, the entire thing needs burned down.
Trump has been in government for 5 years.Another day with TurnCoats rising from free safe sleep rushing over to the device to bash President Trump over a small old issue. Ignoring all the good done. Ignoring how bad it would be under more Obiden.
It's been 1yr 2mo. Largely going it all on his own due to mostly. useless Congress. 5 yrs of Trump fighting the deep state (alone).again, Trump is not the issue.
View attachment 1237240
NSA UtahThe CIA does. I guarantee you, they know what Epstein was up to. And their silence is deafening.
I have read that Rep. Thomas Massie says he has a major move in mind regarding the Epstein files.
He stated that if the Department of Justice, under Pam Bondi, does not release unredacted names linked to Epstein, he could take the issue to the House floor and read the names publicly under congressional immunity.
Under that protection, such statements would be part of the official Congressional Record.
Rep. Thomas Massie says he has a major move in mind regarding the Epstein files.
He stated that if the Department of Justice, under Pam Bondi, does not release unredacted names linked to Epstein, he could take the issue to the House floor and read the names publicly under congressional immunity.
Under that protection, such statements would be part of the official Congressional Record.
This is genius.
In the Yahoo News report, Massie states that he is willing to use the constitutional protections afforded to members of Congress to “publicly read a list of Epstein’s clients” that is being compiled by victims. This is a direct acknowledgment that he may release names on the House floor, where he cannot be prosecuted or sued for doing so.
Members of Congress are protected by the Speech and Debate Clause of the U.S. Constitution.This means:
So if Massie chose to read names aloud, he would be shielded from legal consequences.
- They cannot be prosecuted for statements made during official legislative activity.
- They cannot be sued for defamation for what they say on the floor.
- They can introduce documents into the Congressional Record with legal immunity.
He made this threat two months ago. He's nothing more than a grandstanding blowhard.I say go for it, what is he waiting for? We know DOJ won’t release them, so just do it.
Sounds like grandstanding to me.