Marxist economy.

[danielpalos]

You do know there's a difference between an mixed economy and an marxist one? right???

jeezz

Marxist nations trend to be dictatorships or very controlling of their political process. You will see (or seen) this in Cuba or the USSR. What might come as a shock to you is "social democracies" or mixed economy states trend to very democratic and many of them are far more freer politically then the Untied states offering in some cases half a dozen choices for their voters. Some examples of this is Sweden, France, Germany, etc....

Another difference is the marxist state micromanages everything and control production outright...There is little or no capitalism or private sector in these states at least not the kind that a person can freely create ideas without government signing off on it...Can you please point out what state that is considered first world does this? You can't. But you will find that every single one of them have governments regulating their economies(standards and rules) and promoting human rights, workers standards and investing in their own societies....Governments purpose within an mixed economy doesn't control the production as it is true it doesn't do a very good job at it, but instead acts as moderator which makes it work far better for everyone then a pure capitalist society would.

Dude, we wouldn't do away with labor or the private sector...Has Sweden, Germany, Japan, South Korea or any number of mixed economies that you're attempted to call marxist societies. lol. Fuck no.

Learn the difference...

Mixed economies have proven to fall behind aggressive capitalism. So I don't understand how they work. The only exception seems China.

Which economies are, "aggressive capitalism"?

 

[anotherlife]

Therefore only machinization and automation gives capitalist future perspectives, he noted.

so we can make mechanization illegal and go back to 99% of us farming with hand tools or would that be too much mechanization?? See why we say pure stupidity??

No, the challenge is which group or groups of people is who the Marxists need to legalize to kill. They did the first round of this right after ww2, but with the newest wave of automation, Internet, the second round is cooking. There is no other way.

 

[anotherlife]

We do have a distribution problem.

totally stupid and deadly. China had a distribution problem under liberal communism now under Republican capitalism it has none!!

China does not have republican capitalism. The Chinese economic model is very simple, China simply undercuts every country's labor cost by currency manipulation and by volume.

 

[anotherlife]

His [Marx's] criticisms of capitalism remain relevant to this day.

relevant for tuning out to be 1000% stupid and responsible for killing 120 million slowly through starvation while capitalism just eliminated 40% of the planet's poverty the instant China switched to it from Marxism. Do you think Hitler's commentary on culture remains relevant too??

Marx didn't kill anyone stupid. He was a philosopher, not an autocrat.

yes the philosopher of communism, a philosophy that slowly starved 120 million to death. Its a true love story with American liberals in the audience cheering them on
How did you pick the world's greatest evil to be your object of love??

That wasn't Marx, that was Lenin and the soviets. Pretty evil indeed.

ah like Pol Pot and Castro and 132 others were better?? See why we say stupid??

???

 

[anotherlife]

You do know there's a difference between an mixed economy and an marxist one? right???

jeezz

Marxist nations trend to be dictatorships or very controlling of their political process. You will see (or seen) this in Cuba or the USSR. What might come as a shock to you is "social democracies" or mixed economy states trend to very democratic and many of them are far more freer politically then the Untied states offering in some cases half a dozen choices for their voters. Some examples of this is Sweden, France, Germany, etc....

Another difference is the marxist state micromanages everything and control production outright...There is little or no capitalism or private sector in these states at least not the kind that a person can freely create ideas without government signing off on it...Can you please point out what state that is considered first world does this? You can't. But you will find that every single one of them have governments regulating their economies(standards and rules) and promoting human rights, workers standards and investing in their own societies....Governments purpose within an mixed economy doesn't control the production as it is true it doesn't do a very good job at it, but instead acts as moderator which makes it work far better for everyone then a pure capitalist society would.

Dude, we wouldn't do away with labor or the private sector...Has Sweden, Germany, Japan, South Korea or any number of mixed economies that you're attempted to call marxist societies. lol. Fuck no.

Learn the difference...

Mixed economies have proven to fall behind aggressive capitalism. So I don't understand how they work. The only exception seems China.

Which economies are, "aggressive capitalism"?

Currently these are mostly the ango Saxon economies, most notably the u.s.a. but a few others also, some in east Asia.

 

[Unkotare]

We were discussing Marxian nations not Marxian progressives. Can you name a nation that practiced Marx's communism?

The adjective you're looking for is "Marxist," professor.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

On account of automation, if you take out the human labor part, then you end up with the Marxist model, purely, don't you?

Karl Marx's philosophy centers on the relationship between capital and labor. Without labor he has no philosophy for you and Matthew to pervert.

This is exactly the challenge. How to further Marx's observational model when not only what he calls the essence of human is eliminated, but labor itself too.

Marxist Progressives eliminated 100 million humans, so I guess mass graves are an integral part of Progressive economics

Marxist progressives also created 50++ million humans at other locations, that would not have been born otherwise. These births were mostly along the borders of the axes countries that lost ww2.

So on a net basis, Marxist are responsible for the murder of only 50MM of their countrymen.

Such a deal!

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

China simply undercuts every country's labor cost by currency manipulation and by volume.

every nation is free to do that. and??????????

 

[Unkotare]

We do have a distribution problem.

totally stupid and deadly. China had a distribution problem under liberal communism now under Republican capitalism it has none!!

China does not have republican capitalism. The Chinese economic model is very simple, China simply undercuts every country's labor cost by currency manipulation and by volume.

You're out of date