Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Again, I'm waiting for one of you wingnuts to tell me how drawing insulting pictures is going to get us any closer to winning the war on terror.
Did you also direct that same question at the French ?
Nobody talked about banning the cartoons. Do try to keep up.
We shouldn't give Geller the publicity she craves, though.
Pederasts, and you should worry about your local public school just as much statistically.
You are a troll. No discussion for you.No, it's called objectivity and analysis. You should try it sometime.
Yes, hysterically comparing a few whacks with the Nazis is totally objective.
Again, did you eat paint chips as a child?
Pederasts, and you should worry about your local public school just as much statistically.
“Mock Swine could be said to be the Jerry Sandusky of GOP hate radio, except that instead of molesting children, he has molested and tortured the truth in the service of politicized partisan hackery.”Mock Swine is the Jerry Sandusky of GOP hate radio.
Explain.
Pederasts, and you should worry about your local public school just as much statistically.
No, not really. We have thousands of cases of pedophile priests, even though there are less than 42,000 priests in the US. Meanwhile, public schools employ MILLIONS of people, and yet they probably have less cases than the Church has.
Now why is that?
Well, for starters, the Public schools don't cover it up like the Church did for years. They didn't move these guys from one school to another like the Church did.
[
“Mock Swine could be said to be the Jerry Sandusky of GOP hate radio, except that instead of molesting children, he has molested and tortured the truth in the service of politicized partisan hackery.”
Yes...I love Mark Steyn...he is one of my favorite guest hosts on Rush's show....and he writes very well on the castrated western male politicians and journalists.......
Stay Quiet and You ll Be Okay SteynOnline
It'll be a long time before you see "Washington Post Offers No Apology for Attacking Target of Thwarted Attack" or "AP Says It Has No Regrets After Blaming The Victim". The respectable class in the American media share the same goal as the Islamic fanatics: They want to silence Pam Geller. To be sure, they have a mild disagreement about the means to that end - although even then you get the feeling, as with Garry Trudeau and those dozens of PEN novelists' reaction to Charlie Hebdo, that the "narrative" wouldn't change very much if the jihad boys had got luckier and Pam, Geert Wilders, Robert Spencer and a dozen others were all piled up in the Garland morgue.
If the American press were not so lazy and parochial, they would understand that this was the third Islamic attack on free speech this year - first, Charlie Hebdo in Paris; second, the Lars Vilks event in Copenhagen; and now Texas. The difference in the corpse count is easily explained by a look at the video of the Paris gunmen, or the bullet holes they put in the police car. The French and Texan attackers supposedly had the same kind of weapons, although one should always treat American media reports with a high degree of skepticism when it comes to early identification of "assault weapons" and "AK47s". Nonetheless, from this reconstruction, it seems clear that the key distinction between the two attacks is that in Paris they knew how to use their guns and in Garland they didn't. So a very cool 60-year-old local cop with nothing but his service pistol advanced under fire and took down two guys whose heavier firepower managed only to put a bullet in an unarmed security guard's foot.
The Charlie Hebdo killers had received effective training overseas - as thousands of ISIS recruits with western passports are getting right now. What if the Garland gunmen had been as good as the Paris gunmen? Surely that would be a more interesting question for the somnolent American media than whether some lippy Jewess was asking for it.
Again, I'm waiting for one of you wingnuts to tell me how drawing insulting pictures is going to get us any closer to winning the war on terror.
Did you also direct that same question at the French ?
Yes, I did. The Charlie Hebdo guys spent years insulting Muslims, and then were surprised when they got attacked.
Kind of like if I went around to Biker Bars and said, "You bikers are all pussies!" I really shouldn't be surprised when they beat the tar out of me.
Yes...I love Mark Steyn...he is one of my favorite guest hosts on Rush's show....and he writes very well on the castrated western male politicians and journalists.......
Stay Quiet and You ll Be Okay SteynOnline
It'll be a long time before you see "Washington Post Offers No Apology for Attacking Target of Thwarted Attack" or "AP Says It Has No Regrets After Blaming The Victim". The respectable class in the American media share the same goal as the Islamic fanatics: They want to silence Pam Geller. To be sure, they have a mild disagreement about the means to that end - although even then you get the feeling, as with Garry Trudeau and those dozens of PEN novelists' reaction to Charlie Hebdo, that the "narrative" wouldn't change very much if the jihad boys had got luckier and Pam, Geert Wilders, Robert Spencer and a dozen others were all piled up in the Garland morgue.
If the American press were not so lazy and parochial, they would understand that this was the third Islamic attack on free speech this year - first, Charlie Hebdo in Paris; second, the Lars Vilks event in Copenhagen; and now Texas. The difference in the corpse count is easily explained by a look at the video of the Paris gunmen, or the bullet holes they put in the police car. The French and Texan attackers supposedly had the same kind of weapons, although one should always treat American media reports with a high degree of skepticism when it comes to early identification of "assault weapons" and "AK47s". Nonetheless, from this reconstruction, it seems clear that the key distinction between the two attacks is that in Paris they knew how to use their guns and in Garland they didn't. So a very cool 60-year-old local cop with nothing but his service pistol advanced under fire and took down two guys whose heavier firepower managed only to put a bullet in an unarmed security guard's foot.
The Charlie Hebdo killers had received effective training overseas - as thousands of ISIS recruits with western passports are getting right now. What if the Garland gunmen had been as good as the Paris gunmen? Surely that would be a more interesting question for the somnolent American media than whether some lippy Jewess was asking for it.
Actually the percentage of priests who are pedophiles is lower than the general population. Next time do some research before you spew
Guess your one of those then who believe women who wear provocative clothing, act slutty and get drunk shouldn't be surprised when they get raped. Hell they deserved it in fact.
Feeding the crocodile so you get eaten last, great strategy.
NO, my strategy is more like, "Don't go swimming in the Crocodile's swamp", "don't go around unnecessarily pissing off the Crocodile".. and my all time favorite, "don't raise a big, nasty Crocodile and then be surprised when he turns on you."
That last one is kind of important. You see, every leader over there who has been a pain in the ass to us in the last few decades - Bin Laden, Saddam, etc. - has been someone that CIA has told our president was a guy we could work with.
Let's not forget, before he was a "Terrorist", Ronnie Raygun called Bin Laden a Freedom Fighter. Until he pointed his gun in a different direction.
Unless they are posters on a message board, because you know they can't hurt you. It makes you a coward, nothing but.
and yes, former associates have bitten people on the ass, much like a dog can turn on it's master. You leave out the original one, Fidel Castro turning on JFK.
Unless they are posters on a message board, because you know they can't hurt you. It makes you a coward, nothing but.
If you are coming to a Message Board wanting to discuss religion and politics, you should expect to get criticized. It's not the same thing as deliberately invading someone else's country and insulting their beliefs.
and yes, former associates have bitten people on the ass, much like a dog can turn on it's master. You leave out the original one, Fidel Castro turning on JFK.
Actually, I think you are confused on the whole issue of JFK and Fidel. (Hint, Fidel was in power before JFK was.)
The problem here is that we think of poor brown people as dogs, we treat them like dogs, and then we wonder why they turn on us.
No...democrats see brown and black people like that....just look how they treat them....Baltimore is a good look into those views.....
Unless they are posters on a message board, because you know they can't hurt you. It makes you a coward, nothing but.
If you are coming to a Message Board wanting to discuss religion and politics, you should expect to get criticized. It's not the same thing as deliberately invading someone else's country and insulting their beliefs.
and yes, former associates have bitten people on the ass, much like a dog can turn on it's master. You leave out the original one, Fidel Castro turning on JFK.
Actually, I think you are confused on the whole issue of JFK and Fidel. (Hint, Fidel was in power before JFK was.)
The problem here is that we think of poor brown people as dogs, we treat them like dogs, and then we wonder why they turn on us.
I want one of you liberal idiots to tell me how submitting to a maniacal goon that threatens to kill you for not believing as he does protects your freedom to believe as you choose.Again, I'm waiting for one of you wingnuts to tell me how drawing insulting pictures is going to get us any closer to winning the war on terror.
Because they love the free shit they get for voting Democrat.No...democrats see brown and black people like that....just look how they treat them....Baltimore is a good look into those views.....
So why is it that 90% of brown people vote Democratic? I'm waiting for an answer that doesn't make you sound like a racist twit.
