Mark Levin's Liberal Constitutional Arguments...

[paulitician]

Kind of reminds me of neville chamberlain.

Ron Paul "Why shouldn't Iran have nukes?" - YouTube

Appeasement - YouTube


Sure, we can trust Iran.

Ron Paul is not Neville Chamberlain. That accusation is absurd. And it's also very tired.

 

[Dr.Drock]

Still baffles me that after the disaster in Iraq, the thousands of our best americans coming home in boxes, a hundred thousand dead Iraqis, trillions in debt, tens of thousands of american soldiers permanently injured be it physically or mentally and NONE of this stops certain people from wanting the exact same thing to happen in Iran but on a much larger scale.



How did our country become so numb to the horrors of war? Is Iran having a nuke we could easily intercept, then destroy their entire country with our own nukes, really worth all those sacrifices?

 

[The Infidel]

Kind of reminds me of neville chamberlain.

Ron Paul "Why shouldn't Iran have nukes?" - YouTube

Appeasement - YouTube


Sure, we can trust Iran.

Ron Paul is not Neville Chamberlain. That accusation is absurd. And it's also very tired.

He is cut from the same cloth.

 

[paulitician]

No... its his refusal to run 3rd party... bc he is no Republican.

Ronald Reagan respected and accepted Ron Paul as a fellow Republican. He would be appalled at the way they are treating him now. He is a fellow Republican. The Republican Party better find a way to work with him and his supporters. If they choose to continue this awful treatment of him,they will only guarantee another four years for the Socialists/Progressives. They really should consider working with him and his supporters.

He is no Republican.... he is a libertarian PERIOD END OF STORY!


Dont get me wrong.... R. Paul is a good man, and yes very good fiscally, but thats it. He is not presidential material.

Sorry... he just is'nt.

He is a Republican and Ronald Reagan accepted and repected the man as such. So what the Hell happened to the Republican Party? It seems to be ruled by knuckle-dragging Troglodyte block-heads these days. If you're not a dumb War Mongering Neocon,they want to immediately run you out of the Party. They're destroying the Party. Looks like the Socialists/Progressives have a very bright future. And you can thank the Republican Neocon Troglodytes for that. It's very sad.

 

[The Infidel]

How did our country become so numb to the horrors of war? Is Iran having a nuke we could easily intercept, then destroy their entire country with our own nukes, really worth all those sacrifices?

Irans leader believes war and the destruction of Isreal will bring back the 12th Imam... look it up.
Its a religious thing to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

 

[The Infidel]

Ronald Reagan respected and accepted Ron Paul as a fellow Republican. He would be appalled at the way they are treating him now. He is a fellow Republican. The Republican Party better find a way to work with him and his supporters. If they choose to continue this awful treatment of him,they will only guarantee another four years for the Socialists/Progressives. They really should consider working with him and his supporters.

He is no Republican.... he is a libertarian PERIOD END OF STORY!


Dont get me wrong.... R. Paul is a good man, and yes very good fiscally, but thats it. He is not presidential material.

Sorry... he just is'nt.

He is a Republican and Ronald Reagan accepted and repected the man as such. So what the Hell happened to the Republican Party? It seems to be ruled by knuckle-dragging Troglodyte block-heads these days. If you're not a dumb War Mongering Neocon,they want to immediately run you out of the Party. They're destroying the Party. Looks like the Socialists/Progressives have a very bright future. And you can thank the Republican Neocon Troglodytes for that. It's very sad.

Thanks for showing your true colors.... YELLOW!

 

[Dr.Drock]

How did our country become so numb to the horrors of war? Is Iran having a nuke we could easily intercept, then destroy their entire country with our own nukes, really worth all those sacrifices?

Irans leader believes war and the destruction of Isreal will bring back the 12th Imam... look it up.
Its a religious thing to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

I don't pay taxes for the defense of another country.

Well i shouldn't at least.

Israel could easily blow up Iran in a matter of hours, they've got hundreds of nukes stockpiled.

I'm not willing to sacrifice potentially 10,000 american soldiers, trillions in debt to my grandchildren and hundreds of thousands of Iranian civilians because people are scared Iran may have a nuke sometime.

Fearmongering about Pakistan and North Korea's nukes would make a lot more sense, and I wouldn't support warmongering against them either.

 

[whitehall]

"I'd vote for a can of orange juice before I would vote for Obama"....Mark Levin

 

[The Infidel]

"I'd vote for a can of orange juice before I would vote for Obama"....Mark Levin

And that includes Ron Paul

 

[paulitician]

He is no Republican.... he is a libertarian PERIOD END OF STORY!


Dont get me wrong.... R. Paul is a good man, and yes very good fiscally, but thats it. He is not presidential material.

Sorry... he just is'nt.

He is a Republican and Ronald Reagan accepted and repected the man as such. So what the Hell happened to the Republican Party? It seems to be ruled by knuckle-dragging Troglodyte block-heads these days. If you're not a dumb War Mongering Neocon,they want to immediately run you out of the Party. They're destroying the Party. Looks like the Socialists/Progressives have a very bright future. And you can thank the Republican Neocon Troglodytes for that. It's very sad.

Thanks for showing your true colors.... YELLOW!

Yes i'm being honest. The Neocon Troglodytes are destroying the Party. Ronald Reagan would not approve of the way they have treated their fellow Republican Ron Paul. And it only helps the Socialist/Progressive Democrats win more future Elections. The Neocons' hate is consuming the Party in flames.

They have to learn to accept fellow Republicans who have different ideas and approaches. The hateful ignorant approach just doesn't serve the Republican Party well. The Neocons really should reconsider their behavior. Most Americans will not vote for such hate & ignorance. The Neocons are marginalizing the Party. Ron Paul is a fellow Republican. He should be respected and treated as such. The Party needs new leadership and direction.

 

[The Infidel]

Sure... Ronald Reagan, the man who brought the Soviets to their knees, would be proud of him


Give me a second to raise the BS flag...

 

[paulitician]

Sure... Ronald Reagan, the man who brought the Soviets to their knees, would be proud of him


Give me a second to raise the BS flag...

Ron Paul knew Ronald Reagan. They were friends and colleagues. He would not approve of the way many Republicans have treated their fellow Republican Ron Paul.

 

[Dr.Drock]

Sure... Ronald Reagan, the man who brought the Soviets to their knees, would be proud of him


Give me a second to raise the BS flag...

Read up on Lebanon.



Reagan cut and run, and in his memoirs cutting and running wasn't the mistake, it was getting involved in the middle east in the first place.



He was right, in his memoirs that is.

 

[ilia25]

How did our country become so numb to the horrors of war? Is Iran having a nuke we could easily intercept, then destroy their entire country with our own nukes, really worth all those sacrifices?

Irans leader believes war and the destruction of Isreal will bring back the 12th Imam... look it up.
Its a religious thing to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

I don't pay taxes for the defense of another country.

By protecting Israel, US defending its own interests. Ron Paul is against it because he thinks that it is a part of Jewish conspiracy to rule the world.

 

[Dr.Drock]

Irans leader believes war and the destruction of Isreal will bring back the 12th Imam... look it up.
Its a religious thing to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

I don't pay taxes for the defense of another country.

By protecting Israel, US defending its own interests. Ron Paul is against it because he thinks that it is a part of Jewish conspiracy to rule the world.

 

[The Infidel]

Sure... Ronald Reagan, the man who brought the Soviets to their knees, would be proud of him


Give me a second to raise the BS flag...

Ron Paul knew Ronald Reagan. They were friends and colleagues. He would not approve of the way many Republicans have treated their fellow Republican Ron Paul.

Ive been thinking about your thread and came to this conclusion.

We (Rep., conservatives or whatever ya want to call us) need to work together with Paul supporters. We do need eachother.
One thing that is overlooked by most, including myself, is if the voters speak and make Ron Paul the candidate... we need to get behind him 100%.

I just think that Paul supporters wont reciprocate and vote for another candidate.
I could be wrong, but it would make it easier for me to believe if Ron would just say he wont run 3rd party. After all, he is a Republican right?


Your alright with me paulitician. We are on the same side for the most part.

Sorry for calling ya yellow. Bad form on my part.

 

[paulitician]

Sure... Ronald Reagan, the man who brought the Soviets to their knees, would be proud of him


Give me a second to raise the BS flag...

Ron Paul knew Ronald Reagan. They were friends and colleagues. He would not approve of the way many Republicans have treated their fellow Republican Ron Paul.

Ive been thinking about your thread and came to this conclusion.

We (Rep., conservatives or whatever ya want to call us) need to work together with Paul supporters. We do need eachother.
One thing that is overlooked by most, including myself, is if the voters speak and make Ron Paul the candidate... we need to get behind him 100%.

I just think that Paul supporters wont reciprocate and vote for another candidate.
I could be wrong, but it would make it easier for me to believe if Ron would just say he wont run 3rd party. After all, he is a Republican right?


Your alright with me paulitician. We are on the same side for the most part.

Sorry for calling ya yellow. Bad form on my part.

Thanks Infidel. And you do make some valid points. Ron Paul supporters will have to be flexible too. If we want to boot the Socialists/Progressives, we're gonna have to come together at some point.

 

[Dr.Drock]

Sure... Ronald Reagan, the man who brought the Soviets to their knees, would be proud of him


Give me a second to raise the BS flag...

Ron Paul knew Ronald Reagan. They were friends and colleagues. He would not approve of the way many Republicans have treated their fellow Republican Ron Paul.

Ive been thinking about your thread and came to this conclusion.

We (Rep., conservatives or whatever ya want to call us) need to work together with Paul supporters. We do need eachother.
One thing that is overlooked by most, including myself, is if the voters speak and make Ron Paul the candidate... we need to get behind him 100%.

I just think that Paul supporters wont reciprocate and vote for another candidate.
I could be wrong, but it would make it easier for me to believe if Ron would just say he wont run 3rd party. After all, he is a Republican right?


Your alright with me paulitician. We are on the same side for the most part.

Sorry for calling ya yellow. Bad form on my part.

I agree with a lot of your points, but i can only vote for a fiscal conservative.

I view Romney or Newt as no more fiscally conservative than Obama.

So if it's not Paul (which it won't be) it's 3rd party or no one.

 

[The Infidel]

Ron Paul knew Ronald Reagan. They were friends and colleagues. He would not approve of the way many Republicans have treated their fellow Republican Ron Paul.

Ive been thinking about your thread and came to this conclusion.

We (Rep., conservatives or whatever ya want to call us) need to work together with Paul supporters. We do need eachother.
One thing that is overlooked by most, including myself, is if the voters speak and make Ron Paul the candidate... we need to get behind him 100%.

I just think that Paul supporters wont reciprocate and vote for another candidate.
I could be wrong, but it would make it easier for me to believe if Ron would just say he wont run 3rd party. After all, he is a Republican right?


Your alright with me paulitician. We are on the same side for the most part.

Sorry for calling ya yellow. Bad form on my part.

I agree with a lot of your points, but i can only vote for a fiscal conservative.

I view Romney or Newt as no more fiscally conservative than Obama.

So if it's not Paul (which it won't be) it's 3rd party or no one.

Wow... Newt too?

C'mon man, really?

Obama is wrecking us, I dont see Romney nor Gingrich doing a fraction of the damage Obama has done.

Just my opinion though. You are welcome to be wrong

Im a libertarian to a certain degree, but I wont put my personal interests above those of the nation.
I believe we should 'legalize it', but I wont stake my nations future on it.

Now pass that shit!

 

[Dr.Drock]

Ive been thinking about your thread and came to this conclusion.

We (Rep., conservatives or whatever ya want to call us) need to work together with Paul supporters. We do need eachother.
One thing that is overlooked by most, including myself, is if the voters speak and make Ron Paul the candidate... we need to get behind him 100%.

I just think that Paul supporters wont reciprocate and vote for another candidate.
I could be wrong, but it would make it easier for me to believe if Ron would just say he wont run 3rd party. After all, he is a Republican right?


Your alright with me paulitician. We are on the same side for the most part.

Sorry for calling ya yellow. Bad form on my part.

I agree with a lot of your points, but i can only vote for a fiscal conservative.

I view Romney or Newt as no more fiscally conservative than Obama.

So if it's not Paul (which it won't be) it's 3rd party or no one.

Wow... Newt too?

C'mon man, really?

Obama is wrecking us, I dont see Romney nor Gingrich doing a fraction of the damage Obama has done.

Just my opinion though. You are welcome to be wrong

Im a libertarian to a certain degree, but I wont put my personal interests above those of the nation.
I believe we should 'legalize it', but I wont stake my nations future on it.

Now pass that shit!

Think back to 2000 when it would've been crazy to think Bush would outspend and out-government Clinton.

He even had a majority republican senate and reps, and still from 2001-2007 was the most liberal government in U.S. history up to that point.

Every administration outspends, and grows gov't more than the administration before him, party is 100% entirely inconsequential.

Romney or Newt will outspend Obama, expand Obamacare and even pile on to Obama's debt.

I take no joy in saying that rest assured, but it's a personal guarantee.