Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Of course it is. I saw the podcast of that discussion and lots of things were said and theorized and discussed.I will say its very dishonest of you to make assumptions with a few sentences out of a much larger off the cuff conversation,,,
there werent any reporters there,,I find it ironic and hilarious as hell MTG whines during the conversation about Democrats wanting to control what we do to our bodies. A real reporter would have asked what she thought about transsexuals.
Yeah, no kidding. The last thing people like MTG and Trump want is to be called on their bullshit.there werent any reporters there,,
i'd rather succeed than secede. i don't want a hand out, i want a leg up.
these divisive traitors would have been hanged in the old days
do you think a democrat would go on a show like that for 2 hrs and talk unscripted??Yeah, no kidding. The last thing people like MTG and Trump want is to be called on their bullshit.
No one cares about transsexuals do to themselves. It's how they try to drag the rest of the nation intoI find it ironic and hilarious as hell MTG whines during the conversation about Democrats wanting to control what we do to our bodies. A real reporter would have asked what she thought about transsexuals.
Fifteen millimeters? Hey, barkeep, I'll have what zincwarrior is havin'!The blue represents 15mm people.
Yet, she repeatedly uses the National Divorce rhetoricOf course it is. I saw the podcast of that discussion and lots of things were said and theorized and discussed.
No one seriously and definitively called for a national "divorce". Period!
What idiocy! Like reporters or pundits couldn't watch the Tim Pool podcast for themselves?Yeah, no kidding. The last thing people like MTG and Trump want is to be called on their bullshit.
and she explained in detail what she meant and it was based on original intent and the 10th amendment,,Yet, she repeatedly uses the National Divorce rhetoric
Pay no attention to what I say…..most people dont take me seriously
and she explained in detail what she meant and it was based on original intent and the 10th amendment,,
As are you, though a lot less people give a damn what you say.She is playing her assigned role to perfection.
What MTG is saying is that if Republicans have to be a minority party in this country, they want to take their ball and go home.
Problem is that there are no totally Democratic or totally Republican states
How do you “Divorce”?
The Tucker and Rachel Maddow defense?Yet, she repeatedly uses the National Divorce rhetoric
Pay no attention to what I say…..most people dont take me seriously
Would not be too hard.
A federal government should be much smaller, weaker, and more local.
So you do not divide based on partisanship, but geography, as to shared local issues.
There are 4 sections already, the east and west coasts, the central south, and the central north.
Trying to divide based on partisanship would be wrong, and similar to gerrymandering.
The point of a divide should not be partisanship, but the fact the current federal government is so large and wealthy, it is inherently and completely corrupt.
Parties should be nullified by open elections, with ranking to avoid run offs.
They all people could just vote as they want, for the best candidates, instead of the corrupt partisanship we have now.
Behavior like stealing elections.
They can give instant partial results, but that is bad, not good.
Partial results could influence later voters, and that should not be allowed to happen.