Wry Catcher
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #1
FDA To Evaluate Marijuana For Potential Reclassification As Less Dangerous Drug
Good idea or bad, why?
Good idea or bad, why?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Neither "good" nor "bad" but logical
Good......my bong is lonely...
The Feds have known since at least the late 1970's of the beneficial effects of THC in many medical situations. Further, in the realm of drugs period it is arguably less dangerous than alcohol.
Marijuana should have been decriminalized decades ago. The fact that it hasn't been is a blight on this country. They kept it illegal to benefit the legal/prison industrial complex.
The Feds have known since at least the late 1970's of the beneficial effects of THC in many medical situations. Further, in the realm of drugs period it is arguably less dangerous than alcohol.
Marijuana should have been decriminalized decades ago. The fact that it hasn't been is a blight on this country. They kept it illegal to benefit the legal/prison industrial complex.
I think its very clear that alcohol (and tobacco) are more dangerous than MJ.
I know it has not been kept illiegal because it benefits the " legal/prison industrial complex"; ask any street cop or deputy if they would rather intervene with a drunk or someone high on MJ; ask any CO or Warden about overcrowding an its impact on their job.
Those who benefit from it remaining a schedule I drug are primarily, IMO, Big Pharma and the adult beverage industry; secondarily, federal and state agencies which receive funds to enforce MJ laws.
"A change could put marijuana in the company of cocaine and methamphetamine, two other Schedule II drugs."
Must be some medical appication for meth that I've never heard of?
Somebody posted "it's time to lighten up". I'd say it's way passed time. Too many tens of thousands have done jail time for getting busted with a small amount of a fairly benign pharmaceutical. I have a toke maybe every 2 mos. or so. It's almost time for me to light up a wee bit myself.
"A change could put marijuana in the company of cocaine and methamphetamine, two other Schedule II drugs."
Must be some medical appication for meth that I've never heard of?
Somebody posted "it's time to lighten up". I'd say it's way passed time. Too many tens of thousands have done jail time for getting busted with a small amount of a fairly benign pharmaceutical. I have a toke maybe every 2 mos. or so. It's almost time for me to light up a wee bit myself.
Methamphetamine is known commercially as Desoxyn. It's a prescription drug.
Incidentally, so is cocaine - as a topical anesthetic - although it's very rarely prescribed.
"A change could put marijuana in the company of cocaine and methamphetamine, two other Schedule II drugs."
Must be some medical appication for meth that I've never heard of?
Somebody posted "it's time to lighten up". I'd say it's way passed time. Too many tens of thousands have done jail time for getting busted with a small amount of a fairly benign pharmaceutical. I have a toke maybe every 2 mos. or so. It's almost time for me to light up a wee bit myself.
Methamphetamine is known commercially as Desoxyn. It's a prescription drug.
Incidentally, so is cocaine - as a topical anesthetic - although it's very rarely prescribed.
I googled and found that Desoxyn is used for ADHD in children. That's sad what those kids go thru. I know a bit about Ritalin. My ex was a nurse and had access to all that shit. She used R sometimes for weight reduction-although she wasn't fat at all-10lbs over maybe. Not fat but she was crazy, trust me.
None of my business but are you a Doc? I'm not looking for free med advice.
Pena Nieto said in a speech that "for me it would not be desirable, I am not in favor of an eventual legalization of marijuana," but said he was willing to listen to other opinions. The president said he welcomed a debate on the question, and invited doctors, sociologists and other academics to contribute, but said it "should in no way represent an opening for the consumption of much more dangerous drugs."
The Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that growing, possessing and smoking marijuana for recreation is legal under the right to freedom. At this point, the ruling covers only the plaintiffs in a single case. The ruling did not approve the sale or commercial production of marijuana nor does it imply a general legalization. But if the court rules the same way on five similar petitions, it would then establish the precedent to change the law and allow general recreational use.
An October opinion survey by the Parametria polling firm said that 77 percent of Mexicans opposed legalizing marijuana, while 20 percent supported the idea. The poll had a margin of error of four percentage points. In the United States, the states of Washington, Colorado, Alaska and Oregon have legalized marijuana use. The South American nation of Uruguay adopted a plan to create a legal pot market in 2013.
News from The Associated Press