Maricopa County Board Refuses to Discuss Election Concerns, Calls for Audit to End

[mudwhistle]

Only to Republicans trying to overthrow democracy.

Actually, we are a Republic. The word 'democracy' doesn't appear in the Constitution.

Actually that's mostly semantics in this context, but that's the game you like to play. We have a democratic form of government it's just not a straight out democracy.

Why does the idea of a representative form of government, such as ours, upset you so much you are scrambling to overturn it?

Why are you claiming anyone is trying to overturn the election? If rampant fraud was found, it won’t undo the election, especially the Presidential one. It will just enable the people to see who broke the law and what laws need to be changed to make the elections cleaner and more transparent.

Why are you against transparent elections?

Why are you claiming they weren't trying to overturn an election? They picked 1/6 at the Capitol out of a hat? Really?

Why - in absence of any evidence - do you insist on audit after audit? This is number 3 or 4 for Arizona isn't it?

So you in absence of evidence you just insist on more. That's when you leave rational behavior behind and enter whackadoodle territory.

Rational behavior - we have a system for contesting that has endured for several centuries - we can request recounts, we can send to the courts, we can have the DoJ look for frauds - all of which have applied. And no evidence of significant fraud.

At point will you be satisfied? Rhetorical question. You won't be. Because that's the way conspiracy theories work (or sore losers who can't admit their guy was so crappy he lost to an opponent portrayed as an old geezer). So now, as each level of investigation FAILS to produce evidence of fraud - the investigators and officials themselves are then incorporated into the conspiracy theory - they are "in on the fraud". That's why your reduced to a crackpot group with no experience in election fraud, looking for bamboo fibers in the ballots.

And billing the taxpayers for your crap! All because your leader refuses to admit that He. Is. A. Loser.

The American people are the ones who are paying for this.

"Why - in absence of any evidence - do you insist on audit after audit? This is number 3 or 4 for Arizona isn't it?" You are either blind or real stupid.

Coyote is a looney lefty that can’t face reality.

Absence of evidence? This isn’t looney liberal world, this is the real world where there is plenty of evidence. Repeating “dEbUnKeD” as many times as you want, it doesn’t change the evidence that is there.

Dear Loonie Righty

What you call "looney" is requiring substantiation.

If your "evidence" constantly FAILS to clear the bar through commonly accepted means - then it's false.

You guys have every right to create your own alternative realities, but don't expect us to join you.

Thanks.

Loonie Leftie

Our evidence?
The only evidence that has been presented in court was rejected because of one reason....lack of merit.
Do you understand that?
It means that no state has been able to complete a full audit of the votes yet. Arizona is the only state that is in the process of doing so....and the Democrats have thrown every legal trick in the book at them.
Why are they so afraid of discovery?
A judge cannot entertain a lawsuit unless the state has proven the claims of the plaintiff. They knew this going in.....so this is why they pulled this fraud. They knew it would take months or even years for the courts to work it out.
The Supreme Court could have issued a stay on the certification until the evidence was reviewed fully, but elected not to...thanks to Chief Justice Roberts owing a favor to the Bush family.

Your proof doesn’t exist fir one reason, it doesn’t exist.

You haven't mastered the art of critical thinking. That much is certain.

 

[mudwhistle]

Only to Republicans trying to overthrow democracy.

Actually, we are a Republic. The word 'democracy' doesn't appear in the Constitution.

Actually that's mostly semantics in this context, but that's the game you like to play. We have a democratic form of government it's just not a straight out democracy.

Why does the idea of a representative form of government, such as ours, upset you so much you are scrambling to overturn it?

Why are you claiming anyone is trying to overturn the election? If rampant fraud was found, it won’t undo the election, especially the Presidential one. It will just enable the people to see who broke the law and what laws need to be changed to make the elections cleaner and more transparent.

Why are you against transparent elections?

Why are you claiming they weren't trying to overturn an election? They picked 1/6 at the Capitol out of a hat? Really?

Why - in absence of any evidence - do you insist on audit after audit? This is number 3 or 4 for Arizona isn't it?

So you in absence of evidence you just insist on more. That's when you leave rational behavior behind and enter whackadoodle territory.

Rational behavior - we have a system for contesting that has endured for several centuries - we can request recounts, we can send to the courts, we can have the DoJ look for frauds - all of which have applied. And no evidence of significant fraud.

At point will you be satisfied? Rhetorical question. You won't be. Because that's the way conspiracy theories work (or sore losers who can't admit their guy was so crappy he lost to an opponent portrayed as an old geezer). So now, as each level of investigation FAILS to produce evidence of fraud - the investigators and officials themselves are then incorporated into the conspiracy theory - they are "in on the fraud". That's why your reduced to a crackpot group with no experience in election fraud, looking for bamboo fibers in the ballots.

And billing the taxpayers for your crap! All because your leader refuses to admit that He. Is. A. Loser.

The American people are the ones who are paying for this.

"Why - in absence of any evidence - do you insist on audit after audit? This is number 3 or 4 for Arizona isn't it?" You are either blind or real stupid.

Coyote is a looney lefty that can’t face reality.

Absence of evidence? This isn’t looney liberal world, this is the real world where there is plenty of evidence. Repeating “dEbUnKeD” as many times as you want, it doesn’t change the evidence that is there.

Dear Loonie Righty

What you call "looney" is requiring substantiation.

If your "evidence" constantly FAILS to clear the bar through commonly accepted means - then it's false.

You guys have every right to create your own alternative realities, but don't expect us to join you.

Thanks.

Loonie Leftie

Our evidence?
The only evidence that has been presented in court was rejected because of one reason....lack of merit.
Do you understand that?
It means that no state has been able to complete a full audit of the votes yet. Arizona is the only state that is in the process of doing so....and the Democrats have thrown every legal trick in the book at them.
Why are they so afraid of discovery?
A judge cannot entertain a lawsuit unless the state has proven the claims of the plaintiff. They knew this going in.....so this is why they pulled this fraud. They knew it would take months or even years for the courts to work it out.
The Supreme Court could have issued a stay on the certification until the evidence was reviewed fully, but elected not to...thanks to Chief Justice Roberts owing a favor to the Bush family.

Your proof doesn’t exist fir one reason, it doesn’t exist.

You said yesterday that more Trump Supporters should have been murdered on Jan 6th. That seems to be something worth banning.

No less different than maga fuckups calling the hanging of mike pence or violence against BLM protesters.

And what makes you think that was an actual Trump Supporter?
BTW, I don't see a problem with people calling for violence against an aggressor. In a court of law that's call 'self-defense'. BLM is a Marxist terrorist organization that specializes in harassing people and at times creating an atmosphere of violence. If they would stop blocking roads and harassing people eating in restaurants then maybe they wouldn't have to worry about people getting angry at them.

 

[theHawk]

Only to Republicans trying to overthrow democracy.

Actually, we are a Republic. The word 'democracy' doesn't appear in the Constitution.

Actually that's mostly semantics in this context, but that's the game you like to play. We have a democratic form of government it's just not a straight out democracy.

Why does the idea of a representative form of government, such as ours, upset you so much you are scrambling to overturn it?

Why are you claiming anyone is trying to overturn the election? If rampant fraud was found, it won’t undo the election, especially the Presidential one. It will just enable the people to see who broke the law and what laws need to be changed to make the elections cleaner and more transparent.

Why are you against transparent elections?

Why are you claiming they weren't trying to overturn an election? They picked 1/6 at the Capitol out of a hat? Really?

Why - in absence of any evidence - do you insist on audit after audit? This is number 3 or 4 for Arizona isn't it?

So you in absence of evidence you just insist on more. That's when you leave rational behavior behind and enter whackadoodle territory.

Rational behavior - we have a system for contesting that has endured for several centuries - we can request recounts, we can send to the courts, we can have the DoJ look for frauds - all of which have applied. And no evidence of significant fraud.

At point will you be satisfied? Rhetorical question. You won't be. Because that's the way conspiracy theories work (or sore losers who can't admit their guy was so crappy he lost to an opponent portrayed as an old geezer). So now, as each level of investigation FAILS to produce evidence of fraud - the investigators and officials themselves are then incorporated into the conspiracy theory - they are "in on the fraud". That's why your reduced to a crackpot group with no experience in election fraud, looking for bamboo fibers in the ballots.

And billing the taxpayers for your crap! All because your leader refuses to admit that He. Is. A. Loser.

The American people are the ones who are paying for this.

"Why - in absence of any evidence - do you insist on audit after audit? This is number 3 or 4 for Arizona isn't it?" You are either blind or real stupid.

Coyote is a looney lefty that can’t face reality.

Absence of evidence? This isn’t looney liberal world, this is the real world where there is plenty of evidence. Repeating “dEbUnKeD” as many times as you want, it doesn’t change the evidence that is there.

Dear Loonie Righty

What you call "looney" is requiring substantiation.

If your "evidence" constantly FAILS to clear the bar through commonly accepted means - then it's false.

You guys have every right to create your own alternative realities, but don't expect us to join you.

Thanks.

Loonie Leftie

Our evidence?
The only evidence that has been presented in court was rejected because of one reason....lack of merit.
Do you understand that?
It means that no state has been able to complete a full audit of the votes yet. Arizona is the only state that is in the process of doing so....and the Democrats have thrown every legal trick in the book at them.
Why are they so afraid of discovery?
A judge cannot entertain a lawsuit unless the state has proven the claims of the plaintiff. They knew this going in.....so this is why they pulled this fraud. They knew it would take months or even years for the courts to work it out.
The Supreme Court could have issued a stay on the certification until the evidence was reviewed fully, but elected not to...thanks to Chief Justice Roberts owing a favor to the Bush family.

Your proof doesn’t exist fir one reason, it doesn’t exist.

You said yesterday that more Trump Supporters should have been murdered on Jan 6th. That seems to be something worth banning.

No less different than maga fuckups calling the hanging of mike pence or violence against BLM protesters.

Who has ever called for “hanging” Pence?

Violence against BLM rioters is completely warranted since you know…BLM are violent.

 

[otto105]

Only to Republicans trying to overthrow democracy.

Actually, we are a Republic. The word 'democracy' doesn't appear in the Constitution.

Actually that's mostly semantics in this context, but that's the game you like to play. We have a democratic form of government it's just not a straight out democracy.

Why does the idea of a representative form of government, such as ours, upset you so much you are scrambling to overturn it?

Why are you claiming anyone is trying to overturn the election? If rampant fraud was found, it won’t undo the election, especially the Presidential one. It will just enable the people to see who broke the law and what laws need to be changed to make the elections cleaner and more transparent.

Why are you against transparent elections?

Why are you claiming they weren't trying to overturn an election? They picked 1/6 at the Capitol out of a hat? Really?

Why - in absence of any evidence - do you insist on audit after audit? This is number 3 or 4 for Arizona isn't it?

So you in absence of evidence you just insist on more. That's when you leave rational behavior behind and enter whackadoodle territory.

Rational behavior - we have a system for contesting that has endured for several centuries - we can request recounts, we can send to the courts, we can have the DoJ look for frauds - all of which have applied. And no evidence of significant fraud.

At point will you be satisfied? Rhetorical question. You won't be. Because that's the way conspiracy theories work (or sore losers who can't admit their guy was so crappy he lost to an opponent portrayed as an old geezer). So now, as each level of investigation FAILS to produce evidence of fraud - the investigators and officials themselves are then incorporated into the conspiracy theory - they are "in on the fraud". That's why your reduced to a crackpot group with no experience in election fraud, looking for bamboo fibers in the ballots.

And billing the taxpayers for your crap! All because your leader refuses to admit that He. Is. A. Loser.

The American people are the ones who are paying for this.

"Why - in absence of any evidence - do you insist on audit after audit? This is number 3 or 4 for Arizona isn't it?" You are either blind or real stupid.

Coyote is a looney lefty that can’t face reality.

Absence of evidence? This isn’t looney liberal world, this is the real world where there is plenty of evidence. Repeating “dEbUnKeD” as many times as you want, it doesn’t change the evidence that is there.

Dear Loonie Righty

What you call "looney" is requiring substantiation.

If your "evidence" constantly FAILS to clear the bar through commonly accepted means - then it's false.

You guys have every right to create your own alternative realities, but don't expect us to join you.

Thanks.

Loonie Leftie

Our evidence?
The only evidence that has been presented in court was rejected because of one reason....lack of merit.
Do you understand that?
It means that no state has been able to complete a full audit of the votes yet. Arizona is the only state that is in the process of doing so....and the Democrats have thrown every legal trick in the book at them.
Why are they so afraid of discovery?
A judge cannot entertain a lawsuit unless the state has proven the claims of the plaintiff. They knew this going in.....so this is why they pulled this fraud. They knew it would take months or even years for the courts to work it out.
The Supreme Court could have issued a stay on the certification until the evidence was reviewed fully, but elected not to...thanks to Chief Justice Roberts owing a favor to the Bush family.

Your proof doesn’t exist fir one reason, it doesn’t exist.

You said yesterday that more Trump Supporters should have been murdered on Jan 6th. That seems to be something worth banning.

No less different than maga fuckups calling the hanging of mike pence or violence against BLM protesters.

Who has ever called for “hanging” Pence?

Violence against BLM rioters is completely warranted since you know…BLM are violent.

Fail

 

[otto105]

Only to Republicans trying to overthrow democracy.

Actually, we are a Republic. The word 'democracy' doesn't appear in the Constitution.

Actually that's mostly semantics in this context, but that's the game you like to play. We have a democratic form of government it's just not a straight out democracy.

Why does the idea of a representative form of government, such as ours, upset you so much you are scrambling to overturn it?

Why are you claiming anyone is trying to overturn the election? If rampant fraud was found, it won’t undo the election, especially the Presidential one. It will just enable the people to see who broke the law and what laws need to be changed to make the elections cleaner and more transparent.

Why are you against transparent elections?

Why are you claiming they weren't trying to overturn an election? They picked 1/6 at the Capitol out of a hat? Really?

Why - in absence of any evidence - do you insist on audit after audit? This is number 3 or 4 for Arizona isn't it?

So you in absence of evidence you just insist on more. That's when you leave rational behavior behind and enter whackadoodle territory.

Rational behavior - we have a system for contesting that has endured for several centuries - we can request recounts, we can send to the courts, we can have the DoJ look for frauds - all of which have applied. And no evidence of significant fraud.

At point will you be satisfied? Rhetorical question. You won't be. Because that's the way conspiracy theories work (or sore losers who can't admit their guy was so crappy he lost to an opponent portrayed as an old geezer). So now, as each level of investigation FAILS to produce evidence of fraud - the investigators and officials themselves are then incorporated into the conspiracy theory - they are "in on the fraud". That's why your reduced to a crackpot group with no experience in election fraud, looking for bamboo fibers in the ballots.

And billing the taxpayers for your crap! All because your leader refuses to admit that He. Is. A. Loser.

The American people are the ones who are paying for this.

"Why - in absence of any evidence - do you insist on audit after audit? This is number 3 or 4 for Arizona isn't it?" You are either blind or real stupid.

Coyote is a looney lefty that can’t face reality.

Absence of evidence? This isn’t looney liberal world, this is the real world where there is plenty of evidence. Repeating “dEbUnKeD” as many times as you want, it doesn’t change the evidence that is there.

Dear Loonie Righty

What you call "looney" is requiring substantiation.

If your "evidence" constantly FAILS to clear the bar through commonly accepted means - then it's false.

You guys have every right to create your own alternative realities, but don't expect us to join you.

Thanks.

Loonie Leftie

Our evidence?
The only evidence that has been presented in court was rejected because of one reason....lack of merit.
Do you understand that?
It means that no state has been able to complete a full audit of the votes yet. Arizona is the only state that is in the process of doing so....and the Democrats have thrown every legal trick in the book at them.
Why are they so afraid of discovery?
A judge cannot entertain a lawsuit unless the state has proven the claims of the plaintiff. They knew this going in.....so this is why they pulled this fraud. They knew it would take months or even years for the courts to work it out.
The Supreme Court could have issued a stay on the certification until the evidence was reviewed fully, but elected not to...thanks to Chief Justice Roberts owing a favor to the Bush family.

Your proof doesn’t exist fir one reason, it doesn’t exist.

You said yesterday that more Trump Supporters should have been murdered on Jan 6th. That seems to be something worth banning.

No less different than maga fuckups calling the hanging of mike pence or violence against BLM protesters.

And what makes you think that was an actual Trump Supporter?
BTW, I don't see a problem with people calling for violence against an aggressor. In a court of law that's call 'self-defense'. BLM is a Marxist terrorist organization that specializes in harassing people and at times creating an atmosphere of violence. If they would stop blocking roads and harassing people eating in restaurants then maybe they wouldn't have to worry about people getting angry at them.

Fail, why are you not banned.

 

[mudwhistle]

Only to Republicans trying to overthrow democracy.

Actually, we are a Republic. The word 'democracy' doesn't appear in the Constitution.

Actually that's mostly semantics in this context, but that's the game you like to play. We have a democratic form of government it's just not a straight out democracy.

Why does the idea of a representative form of government, such as ours, upset you so much you are scrambling to overturn it?

Why are you claiming anyone is trying to overturn the election? If rampant fraud was found, it won’t undo the election, especially the Presidential one. It will just enable the people to see who broke the law and what laws need to be changed to make the elections cleaner and more transparent.

Why are you against transparent elections?

Why are you claiming they weren't trying to overturn an election? They picked 1/6 at the Capitol out of a hat? Really?

Why - in absence of any evidence - do you insist on audit after audit? This is number 3 or 4 for Arizona isn't it?

So you in absence of evidence you just insist on more. That's when you leave rational behavior behind and enter whackadoodle territory.

Rational behavior - we have a system for contesting that has endured for several centuries - we can request recounts, we can send to the courts, we can have the DoJ look for frauds - all of which have applied. And no evidence of significant fraud.

At point will you be satisfied? Rhetorical question. You won't be. Because that's the way conspiracy theories work (or sore losers who can't admit their guy was so crappy he lost to an opponent portrayed as an old geezer). So now, as each level of investigation FAILS to produce evidence of fraud - the investigators and officials themselves are then incorporated into the conspiracy theory - they are "in on the fraud". That's why your reduced to a crackpot group with no experience in election fraud, looking for bamboo fibers in the ballots.

And billing the taxpayers for your crap! All because your leader refuses to admit that He. Is. A. Loser.

The American people are the ones who are paying for this.

"Why - in absence of any evidence - do you insist on audit after audit? This is number 3 or 4 for Arizona isn't it?" You are either blind or real stupid.

Coyote is a looney lefty that can’t face reality.

Absence of evidence? This isn’t looney liberal world, this is the real world where there is plenty of evidence. Repeating “dEbUnKeD” as many times as you want, it doesn’t change the evidence that is there.

Dear Loonie Righty

What you call "looney" is requiring substantiation.

If your "evidence" constantly FAILS to clear the bar through commonly accepted means - then it's false.

You guys have every right to create your own alternative realities, but don't expect us to join you.

Thanks.

Loonie Leftie

Our evidence?
The only evidence that has been presented in court was rejected because of one reason....lack of merit.
Do you understand that?
It means that no state has been able to complete a full audit of the votes yet. Arizona is the only state that is in the process of doing so....and the Democrats have thrown every legal trick in the book at them.
Why are they so afraid of discovery?
A judge cannot entertain a lawsuit unless the state has proven the claims of the plaintiff. They knew this going in.....so this is why they pulled this fraud. They knew it would take months or even years for the courts to work it out.
The Supreme Court could have issued a stay on the certification until the evidence was reviewed fully, but elected not to...thanks to Chief Justice Roberts owing a favor to the Bush family.

Your proof doesn’t exist fir one reason, it doesn’t exist.

You said yesterday that more Trump Supporters should have been murdered on Jan 6th. That seems to be something worth banning.

No less different than maga fuckups calling the hanging of mike pence or violence against BLM protesters.

And what makes you think that was an actual Trump Supporter?
BTW, I don't see a problem with people calling for violence against an aggressor. In a court of law that's call 'self-defense'. BLM is a Marxist terrorist organization that specializes in harassing people and at times creating an atmosphere of violence. If they would stop blocking roads and harassing people eating in restaurants then maybe they wouldn't have to worry about people getting angry at them.

Fail, why are you not banned.

Because I practice what I preach and I do my best to follow forum rules.

 

[otto105]

Only to Republicans trying to overthrow democracy.

Actually, we are a Republic. The word 'democracy' doesn't appear in the Constitution.

Actually that's mostly semantics in this context, but that's the game you like to play. We have a democratic form of government it's just not a straight out democracy.

Why does the idea of a representative form of government, such as ours, upset you so much you are scrambling to overturn it?

Why are you claiming anyone is trying to overturn the election? If rampant fraud was found, it won’t undo the election, especially the Presidential one. It will just enable the people to see who broke the law and what laws need to be changed to make the elections cleaner and more transparent.

Why are you against transparent elections?

Why are you claiming they weren't trying to overturn an election? They picked 1/6 at the Capitol out of a hat? Really?

Why - in absence of any evidence - do you insist on audit after audit? This is number 3 or 4 for Arizona isn't it?

So you in absence of evidence you just insist on more. That's when you leave rational behavior behind and enter whackadoodle territory.

Rational behavior - we have a system for contesting that has endured for several centuries - we can request recounts, we can send to the courts, we can have the DoJ look for frauds - all of which have applied. And no evidence of significant fraud.

At point will you be satisfied? Rhetorical question. You won't be. Because that's the way conspiracy theories work (or sore losers who can't admit their guy was so crappy he lost to an opponent portrayed as an old geezer). So now, as each level of investigation FAILS to produce evidence of fraud - the investigators and officials themselves are then incorporated into the conspiracy theory - they are "in on the fraud". That's why your reduced to a crackpot group with no experience in election fraud, looking for bamboo fibers in the ballots.

And billing the taxpayers for your crap! All because your leader refuses to admit that He. Is. A. Loser.

The American people are the ones who are paying for this.

"Why - in absence of any evidence - do you insist on audit after audit? This is number 3 or 4 for Arizona isn't it?" You are either blind or real stupid.

Coyote is a looney lefty that can’t face reality.

Absence of evidence? This isn’t looney liberal world, this is the real world where there is plenty of evidence. Repeating “dEbUnKeD” as many times as you want, it doesn’t change the evidence that is there.

Dear Loonie Righty

What you call "looney" is requiring substantiation.

If your "evidence" constantly FAILS to clear the bar through commonly accepted means - then it's false.

You guys have every right to create your own alternative realities, but don't expect us to join you.

Thanks.

Loonie Leftie

Our evidence?
The only evidence that has been presented in court was rejected because of one reason....lack of merit.
Do you understand that?
It means that no state has been able to complete a full audit of the votes yet. Arizona is the only state that is in the process of doing so....and the Democrats have thrown every legal trick in the book at them.
Why are they so afraid of discovery?
A judge cannot entertain a lawsuit unless the state has proven the claims of the plaintiff. They knew this going in.....so this is why they pulled this fraud. They knew it would take months or even years for the courts to work it out.
The Supreme Court could have issued a stay on the certification until the evidence was reviewed fully, but elected not to...thanks to Chief Justice Roberts owing a favor to the Bush family.

Your proof doesn’t exist fir one reason, it doesn’t exist.

You said yesterday that more Trump Supporters should have been murdered on Jan 6th. That seems to be something worth banning.

No less different than maga fuckups calling the hanging of mike pence or violence against BLM protesters.

And what makes you think that was an actual Trump Supporter?
BTW, I don't see a problem with people calling for violence against an aggressor. In a court of law that's call 'self-defense'. BLM is a Marxist terrorist organization that specializes in harassing people and at times creating an atmosphere of violence. If they would stop blocking roads and harassing people eating in restaurants then maybe they wouldn't have to worry about people getting angry at them.

Fail, why are you not banned.

Because I practice what I preach and I do my best to follow forum rules.

Sure, the aggressor on 1/6 was not the news media.

So, what's your policy for aggressors?

 

[mudwhistle]

Only to Republicans trying to overthrow democracy.

Actually, we are a Republic. The word 'democracy' doesn't appear in the Constitution.

Actually that's mostly semantics in this context, but that's the game you like to play. We have a democratic form of government it's just not a straight out democracy.

Why does the idea of a representative form of government, such as ours, upset you so much you are scrambling to overturn it?

Why are you claiming anyone is trying to overturn the election? If rampant fraud was found, it won’t undo the election, especially the Presidential one. It will just enable the people to see who broke the law and what laws need to be changed to make the elections cleaner and more transparent.

Why are you against transparent elections?

Why are you claiming they weren't trying to overturn an election? They picked 1/6 at the Capitol out of a hat? Really?

Why - in absence of any evidence - do you insist on audit after audit? This is number 3 or 4 for Arizona isn't it?

So you in absence of evidence you just insist on more. That's when you leave rational behavior behind and enter whackadoodle territory.

Rational behavior - we have a system for contesting that has endured for several centuries - we can request recounts, we can send to the courts, we can have the DoJ look for frauds - all of which have applied. And no evidence of significant fraud.

At point will you be satisfied? Rhetorical question. You won't be. Because that's the way conspiracy theories work (or sore losers who can't admit their guy was so crappy he lost to an opponent portrayed as an old geezer). So now, as each level of investigation FAILS to produce evidence of fraud - the investigators and officials themselves are then incorporated into the conspiracy theory - they are "in on the fraud". That's why your reduced to a crackpot group with no experience in election fraud, looking for bamboo fibers in the ballots.

And billing the taxpayers for your crap! All because your leader refuses to admit that He. Is. A. Loser.

The American people are the ones who are paying for this.

"Why - in absence of any evidence - do you insist on audit after audit? This is number 3 or 4 for Arizona isn't it?" You are either blind or real stupid.

Coyote is a looney lefty that can’t face reality.

Absence of evidence? This isn’t looney liberal world, this is the real world where there is plenty of evidence. Repeating “dEbUnKeD” as many times as you want, it doesn’t change the evidence that is there.

Dear Loonie Righty

What you call "looney" is requiring substantiation.

If your "evidence" constantly FAILS to clear the bar through commonly accepted means - then it's false.

You guys have every right to create your own alternative realities, but don't expect us to join you.

Thanks.

Loonie Leftie

Our evidence?
The only evidence that has been presented in court was rejected because of one reason....lack of merit.
Do you understand that?
It means that no state has been able to complete a full audit of the votes yet. Arizona is the only state that is in the process of doing so....and the Democrats have thrown every legal trick in the book at them.
Why are they so afraid of discovery?
A judge cannot entertain a lawsuit unless the state has proven the claims of the plaintiff. They knew this going in.....so this is why they pulled this fraud. They knew it would take months or even years for the courts to work it out.
The Supreme Court could have issued a stay on the certification until the evidence was reviewed fully, but elected not to...thanks to Chief Justice Roberts owing a favor to the Bush family.

Your proof doesn’t exist fir one reason, it doesn’t exist.

You said yesterday that more Trump Supporters should have been murdered on Jan 6th. That seems to be something worth banning.

No less different than maga fuckups calling the hanging of mike pence or violence against BLM protesters.

And what makes you think that was an actual Trump Supporter?
BTW, I don't see a problem with people calling for violence against an aggressor. In a court of law that's call 'self-defense'. BLM is a Marxist terrorist organization that specializes in harassing people and at times creating an atmosphere of violence. If they would stop blocking roads and harassing people eating in restaurants then maybe they wouldn't have to worry about people getting angry at them.

Fail, why are you not banned.

Because I practice what I preach and I do my best to follow forum rules.

Sure, the aggressor on 1/6 was not the news media.

So, what's your policy for aggressors?

Yes it was. They created the situation thru their inflammatory rhetoric before anything happened......most of America saw this thru the eyes of a bunch of snowflakes that are scared to death of Trump Supporters. They made it appear worse than it really was. All the Democrats did was just copy what CNN and MSNBC had already said.....like a bunch of lying scoundrels. CNN and MSNBC were the first to claim it was an insurrection....that way Pelosi and the rest couldn't be accused of starting a panic. And as usual....you idiots fell for it. I bet you've never seen a real riot before.....but this wasn't a riot.

 

[mudwhistle]

This is a protest.....that last video wasn't a protest. This is a riot.......this is Democrat rioters in Washington D.C. after Trump won the election.


There is real violence shown in this video.....so this pretty much shows that anything you can't see on USMB cannot have a rating that triggers the age-restricted function.

 

[asaratis]

Only to Republicans trying to overthrow democracy.

Actually, we are a Republic. The word 'democracy' doesn't appear in the Constitution.

Actually that's mostly semantics in this context, but that's the game you like to play. We have a democratic form of government it's just not a straight out democracy.

Why does the idea of a representative form of government, such as ours, upset you so much you are scrambling to overturn it?

Why are you claiming anyone is trying to overturn the election? If rampant fraud was found, it won’t undo the election, especially the Presidential one. It will just enable the people to see who broke the law and what laws need to be changed to make the elections cleaner and more transparent.

Why are you against transparent elections?

Why are you claiming they weren't trying to overturn an election? They picked 1/6 at the Capitol out of a hat? Really?

Why - in absence of any evidence - do you insist on audit after audit? This is number 3 or 4 for Arizona isn't it?

So you in absence of evidence you just insist on more. That's when you leave rational behavior behind and enter whackadoodle territory.

Rational behavior - we have a system for contesting that has endured for several centuries - we can request recounts, we can send to the courts, we can have the DoJ look for frauds - all of which have applied. And no evidence of significant fraud.

At point will you be satisfied? Rhetorical question. You won't be. Because that's the way conspiracy theories work (or sore losers who can't admit their guy was so crappy he lost to an opponent portrayed as an old geezer). So now, as each level of investigation FAILS to produce evidence of fraud - the investigators and officials themselves are then incorporated into the conspiracy theory - they are "in on the fraud". That's why your reduced to a crackpot group with no experience in election fraud, looking for bamboo fibers in the ballots.

And billing the taxpayers for your crap! All because your leader refuses to admit that He. Is. A. Loser.

The American people are the ones who are paying for this.

"Why - in absence of any evidence - do you insist on audit after audit? This is number 3 or 4 for Arizona isn't it?" You are either blind or real stupid.

Coyote is a looney lefty that can’t face reality.

Absence of evidence? This isn’t looney liberal world, this is the real world where there is plenty of evidence. Repeating “dEbUnKeD” as many times as you want, it doesn’t change the evidence that is there.

If there's plenty of "evidence" where has it been hiding?

What has it been doing in the 7 months on the lamb?


Did it commit more crimes that we don't have any evidence of?

Did it ever make in to Chile?

Forensic audits will expose it. Some evidence (sworn affidavits) has already been established. The courts refused to hear the evidence bacause there was no way to prove enough fraud to reverse the election results. Forensic audits in several states may offer that proof. That is why the Democrats are frantic to stop the audits.

Only to Republicans trying to overthrow democracy.

Actually, we are a Republic. The word 'democracy' doesn't appear in the Constitution.

Actually that's mostly semantics in this context, but that's the game you like to play. We have a democratic form of government it's just not a straight out democracy.

Why does the idea of a representative form of government, such as ours, upset you so much you are scrambling to overturn it?

Why are you claiming anyone is trying to overturn the election? If rampant fraud was found, it won’t undo the election, especially the Presidential one. It will just enable the people to see who broke the law and what laws need to be changed to make the elections cleaner and more transparent.

Why are you against transparent elections?

Why are you claiming they weren't trying to overturn an election? They picked 1/6 at the Capitol out of a hat? Really?

Why - in absence of any evidence - do you insist on audit after audit? This is number 3 or 4 for Arizona isn't it?

So you in absence of evidence you just insist on more. That's when you leave rational behavior behind and enter whackadoodle territory.

Rational behavior - we have a system for contesting that has endured for several centuries - we can request recounts, we can send to the courts, we can have the DoJ look for frauds - all of which have applied. And no evidence of significant fraud.

At point will you be satisfied? Rhetorical question. You won't be. Because that's the way conspiracy theories work (or sore losers who can't admit their guy was so crappy he lost to an opponent portrayed as an old geezer). So now, as each level of investigation FAILS to produce evidence of fraud - the investigators and officials themselves are then incorporated into the conspiracy theory - they are "in on the fraud". That's why your reduced to a crackpot group with no experience in election fraud, looking for bamboo fibers in the ballots.

And billing the taxpayers for your crap! All because your leader refuses to admit that He. Is. A. Loser.

The American people are the ones who are paying for this.

"Why - in absence of any evidence - do you insist on audit after audit? This is number 3 or 4 for Arizona isn't it?" You are either blind or real stupid.

Coyote is a looney lefty that can’t face reality.

Absence of evidence? This isn’t looney liberal world, this is the real world where there is plenty of evidence. Repeating “dEbUnKeD” as many times as you want, it doesn’t change the evidence that is there.

Dear Loonie Righty

What you call "looney" is requiring substantiation.

If your "evidence" constantly FAILS to clear the bar through commonly accepted means - then it's false.

You guys have every right to create your own alternative realities, but don't expect us to join you.

Thanks.

Loonie Leftie

Why are your leftist loonie partners in crime trying to stop the audits. (That is a rhetorical question. See answer above.)

 

[otto105]

Only to Republicans trying to overthrow democracy.

Actually, we are a Republic. The word 'democracy' doesn't appear in the Constitution.

Actually that's mostly semantics in this context, but that's the game you like to play. We have a democratic form of government it's just not a straight out democracy.

Why does the idea of a representative form of government, such as ours, upset you so much you are scrambling to overturn it?

Why are you claiming anyone is trying to overturn the election? If rampant fraud was found, it won’t undo the election, especially the Presidential one. It will just enable the people to see who broke the law and what laws need to be changed to make the elections cleaner and more transparent.

Why are you against transparent elections?

Why are you claiming they weren't trying to overturn an election? They picked 1/6 at the Capitol out of a hat? Really?

Why - in absence of any evidence - do you insist on audit after audit? This is number 3 or 4 for Arizona isn't it?

So you in absence of evidence you just insist on more. That's when you leave rational behavior behind and enter whackadoodle territory.

Rational behavior - we have a system for contesting that has endured for several centuries - we can request recounts, we can send to the courts, we can have the DoJ look for frauds - all of which have applied. And no evidence of significant fraud.

At point will you be satisfied? Rhetorical question. You won't be. Because that's the way conspiracy theories work (or sore losers who can't admit their guy was so crappy he lost to an opponent portrayed as an old geezer). So now, as each level of investigation FAILS to produce evidence of fraud - the investigators and officials themselves are then incorporated into the conspiracy theory - they are "in on the fraud". That's why your reduced to a crackpot group with no experience in election fraud, looking for bamboo fibers in the ballots.

And billing the taxpayers for your crap! All because your leader refuses to admit that He. Is. A. Loser.

The American people are the ones who are paying for this.

"Why - in absence of any evidence - do you insist on audit after audit? This is number 3 or 4 for Arizona isn't it?" You are either blind or real stupid.

Coyote is a looney lefty that can’t face reality.

Absence of evidence? This isn’t looney liberal world, this is the real world where there is plenty of evidence. Repeating “dEbUnKeD” as many times as you want, it doesn’t change the evidence that is there.

If there's plenty of "evidence" where has it been hiding?

What has it been doing in the 7 months on the lamb?


Did it commit more crimes that we don't have any evidence of?

Did it ever make in to Chile?

Forensic audits will expose it. Some evidence (sworn affidavits) has already been established. The courts refused to hear the evidence bacause there was no way to prove enough fraud to reverse the election results. Forensic audits in several states may offer that proof. That is why the Democrats are frantic to stop the audits.

Only to Republicans trying to overthrow democracy.

Actually, we are a Republic. The word 'democracy' doesn't appear in the Constitution.

Actually that's mostly semantics in this context, but that's the game you like to play. We have a democratic form of government it's just not a straight out democracy.

Why does the idea of a representative form of government, such as ours, upset you so much you are scrambling to overturn it?

Why are you claiming anyone is trying to overturn the election? If rampant fraud was found, it won’t undo the election, especially the Presidential one. It will just enable the people to see who broke the law and what laws need to be changed to make the elections cleaner and more transparent.

Why are you against transparent elections?

Why are you claiming they weren't trying to overturn an election? They picked 1/6 at the Capitol out of a hat? Really?

Why - in absence of any evidence - do you insist on audit after audit? This is number 3 or 4 for Arizona isn't it?

So you in absence of evidence you just insist on more. That's when you leave rational behavior behind and enter whackadoodle territory.

Rational behavior - we have a system for contesting that has endured for several centuries - we can request recounts, we can send to the courts, we can have the DoJ look for frauds - all of which have applied. And no evidence of significant fraud.

At point will you be satisfied? Rhetorical question. You won't be. Because that's the way conspiracy theories work (or sore losers who can't admit their guy was so crappy he lost to an opponent portrayed as an old geezer). So now, as each level of investigation FAILS to produce evidence of fraud - the investigators and officials themselves are then incorporated into the conspiracy theory - they are "in on the fraud". That's why your reduced to a crackpot group with no experience in election fraud, looking for bamboo fibers in the ballots.

And billing the taxpayers for your crap! All because your leader refuses to admit that He. Is. A. Loser.

The American people are the ones who are paying for this.

"Why - in absence of any evidence - do you insist on audit after audit? This is number 3 or 4 for Arizona isn't it?" You are either blind or real stupid.

Coyote is a looney lefty that can’t face reality.

Absence of evidence? This isn’t looney liberal world, this is the real world where there is plenty of evidence. Repeating “dEbUnKeD” as many times as you want, it doesn’t change the evidence that is there.

Dear Loonie Righty

What you call "looney" is requiring substantiation.

If your "evidence" constantly FAILS to clear the bar through commonly accepted means - then it's false.

You guys have every right to create your own alternative realities, but don't expect us to join you.

Thanks.

Loonie Leftie

Why are your leftist loonie partners in crime trying to stop the audits. (That is a rhetorical question. See answer above.)

I just love it when idiots suck up the terminology of science without actually doing any science. It just like when Christian's try to put Christ in science classes.

 

[asaratis]

Only to Republicans trying to overthrow democracy.

Actually, we are a Republic. The word 'democracy' doesn't appear in the Constitution.

Actually that's mostly semantics in this context, but that's the game you like to play. We have a democratic form of government it's just not a straight out democracy.

Why does the idea of a representative form of government, such as ours, upset you so much you are scrambling to overturn it?

Why are you claiming anyone is trying to overturn the election? If rampant fraud was found, it won’t undo the election, especially the Presidential one. It will just enable the people to see who broke the law and what laws need to be changed to make the elections cleaner and more transparent.

Why are you against transparent elections?

Why are you claiming they weren't trying to overturn an election? They picked 1/6 at the Capitol out of a hat? Really?

Why - in absence of any evidence - do you insist on audit after audit? This is number 3 or 4 for Arizona isn't it?

So you in absence of evidence you just insist on more. That's when you leave rational behavior behind and enter whackadoodle territory.

Rational behavior - we have a system for contesting that has endured for several centuries - we can request recounts, we can send to the courts, we can have the DoJ look for frauds - all of which have applied. And no evidence of significant fraud.

At point will you be satisfied? Rhetorical question. You won't be. Because that's the way conspiracy theories work (or sore losers who can't admit their guy was so crappy he lost to an opponent portrayed as an old geezer). So now, as each level of investigation FAILS to produce evidence of fraud - the investigators and officials themselves are then incorporated into the conspiracy theory - they are "in on the fraud". That's why your reduced to a crackpot group with no experience in election fraud, looking for bamboo fibers in the ballots.

And billing the taxpayers for your crap! All because your leader refuses to admit that He. Is. A. Loser.

The American people are the ones who are paying for this.

"Why - in absence of any evidence - do you insist on audit after audit? This is number 3 or 4 for Arizona isn't it?" You are either blind or real stupid.

Coyote is a looney lefty that can’t face reality.

Absence of evidence? This isn’t looney liberal world, this is the real world where there is plenty of evidence. Repeating “dEbUnKeD” as many times as you want, it doesn’t change the evidence that is there.

If there's plenty of "evidence" where has it been hiding?

What has it been doing in the 7 months on the lamb?


Did it commit more crimes that we don't have any evidence of?

Did it ever make in to Chile?

Forensic audits will expose it. Some evidence (sworn affidavits) has already been established. The courts refused to hear the evidence bacause there was no way to prove enough fraud to reverse the election results. Forensic audits in several states may offer that proof. That is why the Democrats are frantic to stop the audits.

Only to Republicans trying to overthrow democracy.

Actually, we are a Republic. The word 'democracy' doesn't appear in the Constitution.

Actually that's mostly semantics in this context, but that's the game you like to play. We have a democratic form of government it's just not a straight out democracy.

Why does the idea of a representative form of government, such as ours, upset you so much you are scrambling to overturn it?

Why are you claiming anyone is trying to overturn the election? If rampant fraud was found, it won’t undo the election, especially the Presidential one. It will just enable the people to see who broke the law and what laws need to be changed to make the elections cleaner and more transparent.

Why are you against transparent elections?

Why are you claiming they weren't trying to overturn an election? They picked 1/6 at the Capitol out of a hat? Really?

Why - in absence of any evidence - do you insist on audit after audit? This is number 3 or 4 for Arizona isn't it?

So you in absence of evidence you just insist on more. That's when you leave rational behavior behind and enter whackadoodle territory.

Rational behavior - we have a system for contesting that has endured for several centuries - we can request recounts, we can send to the courts, we can have the DoJ look for frauds - all of which have applied. And no evidence of significant fraud.

At point will you be satisfied? Rhetorical question. You won't be. Because that's the way conspiracy theories work (or sore losers who can't admit their guy was so crappy he lost to an opponent portrayed as an old geezer). So now, as each level of investigation FAILS to produce evidence of fraud - the investigators and officials themselves are then incorporated into the conspiracy theory - they are "in on the fraud". That's why your reduced to a crackpot group with no experience in election fraud, looking for bamboo fibers in the ballots.

And billing the taxpayers for your crap! All because your leader refuses to admit that He. Is. A. Loser.

The American people are the ones who are paying for this.

"Why - in absence of any evidence - do you insist on audit after audit? This is number 3 or 4 for Arizona isn't it?" You are either blind or real stupid.

Coyote is a looney lefty that can’t face reality.

Absence of evidence? This isn’t looney liberal world, this is the real world where there is plenty of evidence. Repeating “dEbUnKeD” as many times as you want, it doesn’t change the evidence that is there.

Dear Loonie Righty

What you call "looney" is requiring substantiation.

If your "evidence" constantly FAILS to clear the bar through commonly accepted means - then it's false.

You guys have every right to create your own alternative realities, but don't expect us to join you.

Thanks.

Loonie Leftie

Why are your leftist loonie partners in crime trying to stop the audits. (That is a rhetorical question. See answer above.)

I just love it when idiots suck up the terminology of science without actually doing any science. It just like when Christian's try to put Christ in science classes.

You are among the most laughable idiots on this site. The thought of your contributing either egg or sperm to the production of human offspring causes nausea.

 

[theHawk]

It just like when Christian's try to put Christ in science classes.

Example?

 

[otto105]

Only to Republicans trying to overthrow democracy.

Actually, we are a Republic. The word 'democracy' doesn't appear in the Constitution.

Actually that's mostly semantics in this context, but that's the game you like to play. We have a democratic form of government it's just not a straight out democracy.

Why does the idea of a representative form of government, such as ours, upset you so much you are scrambling to overturn it?

Why are you claiming anyone is trying to overturn the election? If rampant fraud was found, it won’t undo the election, especially the Presidential one. It will just enable the people to see who broke the law and what laws need to be changed to make the elections cleaner and more transparent.

Why are you against transparent elections?

Why are you claiming they weren't trying to overturn an election? They picked 1/6 at the Capitol out of a hat? Really?

Why - in absence of any evidence - do you insist on audit after audit? This is number 3 or 4 for Arizona isn't it?

So you in absence of evidence you just insist on more. That's when you leave rational behavior behind and enter whackadoodle territory.

Rational behavior - we have a system for contesting that has endured for several centuries - we can request recounts, we can send to the courts, we can have the DoJ look for frauds - all of which have applied. And no evidence of significant fraud.

At point will you be satisfied? Rhetorical question. You won't be. Because that's the way conspiracy theories work (or sore losers who can't admit their guy was so crappy he lost to an opponent portrayed as an old geezer). So now, as each level of investigation FAILS to produce evidence of fraud - the investigators and officials themselves are then incorporated into the conspiracy theory - they are "in on the fraud". That's why your reduced to a crackpot group with no experience in election fraud, looking for bamboo fibers in the ballots.

And billing the taxpayers for your crap! All because your leader refuses to admit that He. Is. A. Loser.

The American people are the ones who are paying for this.

"Why - in absence of any evidence - do you insist on audit after audit? This is number 3 or 4 for Arizona isn't it?" You are either blind or real stupid.

Coyote is a looney lefty that can’t face reality.

Absence of evidence? This isn’t looney liberal world, this is the real world where there is plenty of evidence. Repeating “dEbUnKeD” as many times as you want, it doesn’t change the evidence that is there.

If there's plenty of "evidence" where has it been hiding?

What has it been doing in the 7 months on the lamb?


Did it commit more crimes that we don't have any evidence of?

Did it ever make in to Chile?

Forensic audits will expose it. Some evidence (sworn affidavits) has already been established. The courts refused to hear the evidence bacause there was no way to prove enough fraud to reverse the election results. Forensic audits in several states may offer that proof. That is why the Democrats are frantic to stop the audits.

Only to Republicans trying to overthrow democracy.

Actually, we are a Republic. The word 'democracy' doesn't appear in the Constitution.

Actually that's mostly semantics in this context, but that's the game you like to play. We have a democratic form of government it's just not a straight out democracy.

Why does the idea of a representative form of government, such as ours, upset you so much you are scrambling to overturn it?

Why are you claiming anyone is trying to overturn the election? If rampant fraud was found, it won’t undo the election, especially the Presidential one. It will just enable the people to see who broke the law and what laws need to be changed to make the elections cleaner and more transparent.

Why are you against transparent elections?

Why are you claiming they weren't trying to overturn an election? They picked 1/6 at the Capitol out of a hat? Really?

Why - in absence of any evidence - do you insist on audit after audit? This is number 3 or 4 for Arizona isn't it?

So you in absence of evidence you just insist on more. That's when you leave rational behavior behind and enter whackadoodle territory.

Rational behavior - we have a system for contesting that has endured for several centuries - we can request recounts, we can send to the courts, we can have the DoJ look for frauds - all of which have applied. And no evidence of significant fraud.

At point will you be satisfied? Rhetorical question. You won't be. Because that's the way conspiracy theories work (or sore losers who can't admit their guy was so crappy he lost to an opponent portrayed as an old geezer). So now, as each level of investigation FAILS to produce evidence of fraud - the investigators and officials themselves are then incorporated into the conspiracy theory - they are "in on the fraud". That's why your reduced to a crackpot group with no experience in election fraud, looking for bamboo fibers in the ballots.

And billing the taxpayers for your crap! All because your leader refuses to admit that He. Is. A. Loser.

The American people are the ones who are paying for this.

"Why - in absence of any evidence - do you insist on audit after audit? This is number 3 or 4 for Arizona isn't it?" You are either blind or real stupid.

Coyote is a looney lefty that can’t face reality.

Absence of evidence? This isn’t looney liberal world, this is the real world where there is plenty of evidence. Repeating “dEbUnKeD” as many times as you want, it doesn’t change the evidence that is there.

Dear Loonie Righty

What you call "looney" is requiring substantiation.

If your "evidence" constantly FAILS to clear the bar through commonly accepted means - then it's false.

You guys have every right to create your own alternative realities, but don't expect us to join you.

Thanks.

Loonie Leftie

Why are your leftist loonie partners in crime trying to stop the audits. (That is a rhetorical question. See answer above.)

I just love it when idiots suck up the terminology of science without actually doing any science. It just like when Christian's try to put Christ in science classes.

You are among the most laughable idiots on this site. The thought of your contributing either egg or sperm to the production of human offspring causes nausea.

What? Ran out of stupid shit to post already?

 

[Coyote]

It just like when Christian's try to put Christ in science classes.

Example?

Republicans who pushed Arkansas' anti-trans ban just passed a bill to teach creationism in schools

The anti-science connection behind the right's anti-trans push and the move to return creationism to the classroom

www.salon.com

 

[theHawk]

It just like when Christian's try to put Christ in science classes.

Example?

Republicans who pushed Arkansas' anti-trans ban just passed a bill to teach creationism in schools

The anti-science connection behind the right's anti-trans push and the move to return creationism to the classroom

www.salon.com

And? Where is “Christ” in the science classroom?

Give specifics.

 

[asaratis]

It just like when Christian's try to put Christ in science classes.

Example?

Republicans who pushed Arkansas' anti-trans ban just passed a bill to teach creationism in schools

The anti-science connection behind the right's anti-trans push and the move to return creationism to the classroom

www.salon.com

And? Where is “Christ” in the science classroom?

Give specifics.

She can't...

 

[otto105]

It just like when Christian's try to put Christ in science classes.

Example?

Republicans who pushed Arkansas' anti-trans ban just passed a bill to teach creationism in schools

The anti-science connection behind the right's anti-trans push and the move to return creationism to the classroom

www.salon.com

And? Where is “Christ” in the science classroom?

Give specifics.

Have you never heard of the term creation science?

 

[asaratis]

It just like when Christian's try to put Christ in science classes.

Example?

Republicans who pushed Arkansas' anti-trans ban just passed a bill to teach creationism in schools

The anti-science connection behind the right's anti-trans push and the move to return creationism to the classroom

www.salon.com

And? Where is “Christ” in the science classroom?

Give specifics.

Have you never heard of the term creation science?

Give us a link showing the inclusion of "Christ" in it.

 

[otto105]

It just like when Christian's try to put Christ in science classes.

Example?

Republicans who pushed Arkansas' anti-trans ban just passed a bill to teach creationism in schools

The anti-science connection behind the right's anti-trans push and the move to return creationism to the classroom

www.salon.com

And? Where is “Christ” in the science classroom?

Give specifics.

Have you never heard of the term creation science?

Give us a link showing the inclusion of "Christ" in it.

Science Curriculum - Creation Studies Institutem