Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wow he might as well drop out now.
Rubio's inexperience is showing here, he's going to self destruct.
Doesn't bother me none. That's a personal matter. Whether it will help or hurt in the election, I don't know. I doubt it.
Is it a personal matter for all Conservatives, or has all this screaming about evil gays just been smoke and mirrors?
Some of us only scream over government forcing on the issue, not the issue itself.
Yes, social conservatives see homosexuality as sinful, but strict constructional federalists such as myself are more concerned over the sins of progressives when it comes to the constitution, and not any perceived sins of homosexuality itself.
Ok, I can accept that and also appreciate you wording it the way you word it, for that shows some good discernment on your part. Bravo.
Only, not every voter is going to discern as well as you did.
I personally have not problem with Rubio's stance and especially, no problem with his explanation, which made complete sense to me. He too is discerning between a stance for or against an institution and a personal encounter at an event somewhere where he would be invited.
I cannot fault his words or his intentions at all, but I can imagine a number of deep-red conservatives who, as I just indicated about your well-written response, are not going to discern as well. They will see a headline and simply grumble dissatisfaction.
Smile Yoda, It wasn't about breaking anything up, just wanted to make you smile.????? You too?Rubio is young, dynamic, good-looking
Hmmmmm???
I am talking about his optic among voters, specifically, among female voters.
Candidate who project an image of vigor generally tend to do better.
WrongHis problem is he supports states denying gay Americans access to marriage in violation of the 14th Amendment.Marco Rubio I d attend a gay wedding - Nick Gass - POLITICO
(Video at the link)
His reasoning:
...“If there’s somebody that I love that’s in my life, I don’t necessarily have to agree with their decisions or the decisions they’ve made to continue to love them and participate in important events,” he told Ramos.
The senator said he would not hurt that person simply because he disagrees with what they have decided to do.
“Ultimately, if someone that you care for and is part of your family has decided to move in one direction or another or feels that way because of who they love, you respect that because you love them,” he said.
Rubio, who is Catholic, added that it is akin to attending “second marriages” after divorce, which are not exactly encouraged in the Catholic Church.
“If someone gets divorced, I’m not going to stop loving them or having them a part of our lives,” he said....
Discuss. Will this hurt or help him in the GOP primaries?
In your opinion.
Doesn't bother me none. That's a personal matter. Whether it will help or hurt in the election, I don't know. I doubt it.
Is it a personal matter for all Conservatives, or has all this screaming about evil gays just been smoke and mirrors?
Some of us only scream over government forcing on the issue, not the issue itself.
Yes, social conservatives see homosexuality as sinful, but strict constructional federalists such as myself are more concerned over the sins of progressives when it comes to the constitution, and not any perceived sins of homosexuality itself.
Ok, I can accept that and also appreciate you wording it the way you word it, for that shows some good discernment on your part. Bravo.
Only, not every voter is going to discern as well as you did.
I personally have not problem with Rubio's stance and especially, no problem with his explanation, which made complete sense to me. He too is discerning between a stance for or against an institution and a personal encounter at an event somewhere where he would be invited.
I cannot fault his words or his intentions at all, but I can imagine a number of deep-red conservatives who, as I just indicated about your well-written response, are not going to discern as well. They will see a headline and simply grumble dissatisfaction.
That's a problem with every issue, not just this one, and applies to low info voters on your side as well.
WrongHis problem is he supports states denying gay Americans access to marriage in violation of the 14th Amendment.Marco Rubio I d attend a gay wedding - Nick Gass - POLITICO
(Video at the link)
His reasoning:
...“If there’s somebody that I love that’s in my life, I don’t necessarily have to agree with their decisions or the decisions they’ve made to continue to love them and participate in important events,” he told Ramos.
The senator said he would not hurt that person simply because he disagrees with what they have decided to do.
“Ultimately, if someone that you care for and is part of your family has decided to move in one direction or another or feels that way because of who they love, you respect that because you love them,” he said.
Rubio, who is Catholic, added that it is akin to attending “second marriages” after divorce, which are not exactly encouraged in the Catholic Church.
“If someone gets divorced, I’m not going to stop loving them or having them a part of our lives,” he said....
Discuss. Will this hurt or help him in the GOP primaries?
In your opinion.
That's Rubio's position on the issue.
He is softening up conservative homosexuals, also it is a preemptive strike when news come out about one of his "loved" ones being homosexual and got "married"Rubio's inexperience is showing here, he's going to self destruct.
Personally I do not think homosexuality is sin or sinful but I strongly oppose them when they want to change the definition of marriage what has been understood throughout many millennia and the militant "in your face attitude."Yes, social conservatives see homosexuality as sinful, but strict constructional federalists such as myself are more concerned over the sins of progressives when it comes to the constitution, and not any perceived sins of homosexuality itself.
