Doesn't bother me none. That's a personal matter. Whether it will help or hurt in the election, I don't know. I doubt it.
Is it a personal matter for all Conservatives, or has all this screaming about evil gays just been smoke and mirrors?
Some of us only scream over government forcing on the issue, not the issue itself.
Yes, social conservatives see homosexuality as sinful, but strict constructional federalists such as myself are more concerned over the sins of progressives when it comes to the constitution, and not any perceived sins of homosexuality itself.
Ok, I can accept that and also appreciate you wording it the way you word it, for that shows some good discernment on your part. Bravo.
Only, not every voter is going to discern as well as you did.
I personally have not problem with Rubio's stance and especially, no problem with his explanation, which made complete sense to me. He too is discerning between a stance for or against an institution and a personal encounter at an event somewhere where he would be invited.
I cannot fault his words or his intentions at all, but I can imagine a number of deep-red conservatives who, as I just indicated about your well-written response, are not going to discern as well. They will see a headline and simply grumble dissatisfaction.