Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Good job Officers. They did their job and arrested the culprit so he can face justice.
No. They failed to protect the public. The KILLER chose not to further his killing spree. Not the cops. He could've ran down the street and killed another person...because these cops failed their duty and RAN AWAY.
If we encourage this cowardice from police officers...oir society is doomed.
These officers should be reprimanded. That knife weilding man should never have had an opportunity to escape their custody. He'd already killed two and wanted to kill more. And they RAN AWAY and gave him the opportunity to go do more had he chosen to.
And you applaud that?
Would you support cops running away from a mall where a gunman had just shot 2 people and possibly wanted to kill more???
Because he got tired. Why must you always be an idiot?Good job Officers. They did their job and arrested the culprit so he can face justice.
No. They failed to protect the public. The KILLER chose not to further his killing spree. Not the cops. He could've ran down the street and killed another person...because these cops failed their duty and RAN AWAY.
If we encourage this cowardice from police officers...oir society is doomed.
These officers should be reprimanded. That knife weilding man should never have had an opportunity to escape their custody. He'd already killed two and wanted to kill more. And they RAN AWAY and gave him the opportunity to go do more had he chosen to.
And you applaud that?
Would you support cops running away from a mall where a gunman had just shot 2 people and possibly wanted to kill more???
They ran away? How did they arrest the criminal then?
Idiot misses the point like always. I would have shot him on sight, screw the pansy protesters.Good job Officers. They did their job and arrested the culprit so he can face justice.
It's tough being a cop because of idiot spineless thug loving retards who blame the cops when they do their jobs. Officer Wilson did his job and people are still spreading lies.BUCS, you are not helping the situation with your threads and comments, you are hurting your fellow cops with your arrogance.... not necessarily on this thread but most all of your others.
It's tough being a cop, we all understand that, and there truly are few instances of abuse with cops compared to all of the arrests made in a year...
BUT there are some instances where policemen have been just flat out wrong in their judgement, in their killings and punching and choke holding and stealing video's or erasing them etc.... if you just have this good ole boys club of cops and prosecutors and district attorneys that cover up wrong doings by giving each other free passes no one will trust you....
And as long as police and people like you keep covering up or forgiving or giving a ''pass' to those cops who kill when not absolutely necessary, you will have people bad mouthing you/the cops....and I'll be the first in line.
It's tough being a cop because of idiot spineless thug loving retards who blame the cops when they do their jobs. Officer Wilson did his job and people are still spreading lies.BUCS, you are not helping the situation with your threads and comments, you are hurting your fellow cops with your arrogance.... not necessarily on this thread but most all of your others.
It's tough being a cop, we all understand that, and there truly are few instances of abuse with cops compared to all of the arrests made in a year...
BUT there are some instances where policemen have been just flat out wrong in their judgement, in their killings and punching and choke holding and stealing video's or erasing them etc.... if you just have this good ole boys club of cops and prosecutors and district attorneys that cover up wrong doings by giving each other free passes no one will trust you....
And as long as police and people like you keep covering up or forgiving or giving a ''pass' to those cops who kill when not absolutely necessary, you will have people bad mouthing you/the cops....and I'll be the first in line.
These cops have some balls and they made a point that needed to be made.
These cops have some balls and they made a point that needed to be made.
What point? That its ok to just run away from an armed murderer who just killed two people....thus giving him an opportunity to flee and go kill more people?
If your child is randomly murdered....and you find out it was done by a psycho who had already killed 2 others and the COPS HAD HIM IN FRONT OF THEM....hut they chose to run away....would you still be ok with that?
You'd demand the cops be jailed and you know it.
But hey...maybe more cops will take this retreat approach....and you or a loved one will fall victim to a predator who the cops ran away from.
2- THIS one pisses me off most. You are running from him and hes killed two people already. What if while you run...he realizes he wont get you...and he turns and runs next door or down the steeet and kills an innocent mom or grandpa or child?? All because you wanted to avoid protests over you defending yourself...AND OTHERS?!
.
This is silly. The cops should have taken the lunatic and they did. That they ran first is what you make a big deal about, and are trying to blame the people who bitched about cops going WAY over the line in brutalizing citizens.
The two are unrelated. Want to be a cop? Then understand that you can defend yourself (and others) against an armed assailant, but you cannot murder unarmed citizens for no reason. If you cannot see the difference, you need not apply to be an armed servant of the public.
This is silly. The cops should have taken the lunatic and they did. That they ran first is what you make a big deal about, and are trying to blame the people who bitched about cops going WAY over the line in brutalizing citizens.
The two are unrelated. Want to be a cop? Then understand that you can defend yourself (and others) against an armed assailant, but you cannot murder unarmed citizens for no reason. If you cannot see the difference, you need not apply to be an armed servant of the public.
So much stupid , where to start
Hey lets start here.
What does armed have to do with it? You don't think an unarmed man can be dangerous?
Of course being armed makes the man more dangerous , but that doesn't mean an unarmed man is NOT dangerous.
Frankly , the police officer in the story Tom was just relating came closer to doing something wrong than Wilson did.
A man who is just standing there with a knife, making threats is NOT as much of a threat as unarmed 300 lb man who's charging at you is.
This is silly. The cops should have taken the lunatic and they did. That they ran first is what you make a big deal about, and are trying to blame the people who bitched about cops going WAY over the line in brutalizing citizens.
The two are unrelated. Want to be a cop? Then understand that you can defend yourself (and others) against an armed assailant, but you cannot murder unarmed citizens for no reason. If you cannot see the difference, you need not apply to be an armed servant of the public.
So much stupid , where to start
Hey lets start here.
What does armed have to do with it? You don't think an unarmed man can be dangerous?
Of course being armed makes the man more dangerous , but that doesn't mean an unarmed man is NOT dangerous.
Frankly , the police officer in the story Tom was just relating came closer to doing something wrong than Wilson did.
A man who is just standing there with a knife, making threats is NOT as much of a threat as unarmed 300 lb man who's charging at you is.
This is silly. The cops should have taken the lunatic and they did. That they ran first is what you make a big deal about, and are trying to blame the people who bitched about cops going WAY over the line in brutalizing citizens.
The two are unrelated. Want to be a cop? Then understand that you can defend yourself (and others) against an armed assailant, but you cannot murder unarmed citizens for no reason. If you cannot see the difference, you need not apply to be an armed servant of the public.
So much stupid , where to start
Hey lets start here.
What does armed have to do with it? You don't think an unarmed man can be dangerous?
Of course being armed makes the man more dangerous , but that doesn't mean an unarmed man is NOT dangerous.
Frankly , the police officer in the story Tom was just relating came closer to doing something wrong than Wilson did.
A man who is just standing there with a knife, making threats is NOT as much of a threat as unarmed 300 lb man who's charging at you is.
First of all, please point out where I mentioned the Wilson case at all. The Garner murder was much more like what I was talking about, and there are even better examples in the news on a regular basis.
And armed does have something to do with it. Ask a cop what the plans are when dealing with an armed assailant as opposed to an unarmed one. If he says they are the same then he is either ignorant or lying. In this case there was more than one cop, so the procedures WOULD be very different. Remember the old joke about bringing a knife to a gun fight? If these officers had a reasonable suspicion that he had just killed people, then they are WELL justified in using deadly force and they know it.
If you cannot see the difference, you need not apply to be an armed servant of the public.
If you cannot see the difference, you need not apply to be an armed servant of the public.
He used to be one. That's the frightening part, but then, not so surprising. bucs90 exhibits the very abusive attitude all too prevalent in law enforcement today, hence the reason all these protests are now taking place.
If you cannot see the difference, you need not apply to be an armed servant of the public.
He used to be one. That's the frightening part, but then, not so surprising. bucs90 exhibits the very abusive attitude all too prevalent in law enforcement today, hence the reason all these protests are now taking place.