Ah, the legal kerfuffle in the Big Apple, where the New York prosecutor, Bragg, is hot on the heels of former President Trump, accusing a Republican-led committee of meddling in his case. The battling has been rather fierce between Bragg and the House Judiciary Committee since the scent of indictment reached their nostrils.
In a twist worthy of a courtroom drama, the committee has summoned one Mark Pomerantz, an ex-attorney critical of Bragg's tactics. However, Bragg won't stand for it, and has launched a lawsuit to prevent Pomerantz's testimony, claiming that the meddling violates state sovereignty and reeks of politics.
Chairman Jim Jordan retaliates with a tweet, suggesting Trump's indictment is without basis and that Bragg is obstructing their much-needed oversight. As the drama unfolds, a "field hearing" has been scheduled by the House Judiciary Committee just a stone's throw from Bragg's office and the courthouse where Trump's legal fate hangs in the balance.
And so, the story is developing, the plot thickens, now please pass the popcorn.
The New York prosecutor who is pursuing criminal charges against former President Trump says a Republican-led congressional committee is trying to interfere with his case. Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg alleges "an unconstitutional attempt to undermine" his investigation.
The House Judiciary Committee and Bragg have been sparring since it became clear that Trump would be indicted. Last week, the committee subpoenaed a former attorney in the DA's office, Mark Pomerantz, who wrote a book that was critical of Bragg's legal judgments.