House Republican chairman refers Jack Smith’s former deputy to DOJ for prosecution

[Mick2]

Did you read the letter? They’re whining because he took the 5th.

You’re going to prosecute that? Of course not.

If he and his Biden cronies, Garland and Smith, did nothing wrong then why did he take the 5th over and over?

 

[Mick2]

I'm sure the uber experienced and skilled Jack Smith will get a good laugh out of whatever incompetent idiots the fat rapist sends after him in court.

"uber experienced and skilled Jack Smith"






Same doofus who got beaten down time and time again in court while he worked in cahoots with Garland to desperately try to take down Biden's biggest political threat, right?

 

[Marener]

If he and his Biden cronies, Garland and Smith, did nothing wrong then why did he take the 5th over and over?

Because Trump’s DoJ is thoroughly corrupted by politics.

 

[BackAgain]

I'm sure the uber experienced and skilled Jack Smith will get a good laugh out of whatever incompetent idiots the fat rapist sends after him in court.

Nobody cares what some random uber-partisan hack, like you, is “sure” about.

 

[Mick2]

Because Trump’s DoJ is thoroughly corrupted by politics.

The people literally trying to desperate defend those who tried to take down their political enemies and getting exposed for it are now screaming about justice being "corrupted by politics"??



Unf*cking real!

You're trying to be extra stupid today, aren't you?

 

[Marener]

The people literally trying to desperate defend those who tried to take down their political enemies and getting exposed for it are now screaming about justice being "corrupted by politics"??



Unf*cking real!

You're trying to be extra stupid today, aren't you?

You haven’t exposed anything. Trump was prosecuted because he committed crimes.

Now he’s out for revenge because he’s kind of fascist.

 

[Mick2]

You haven’t exposed anything. Trump was prosecuted because he committed crimes.
.

Says who?

The same people who tried to take him down using Biden's Department of Justice and prevent him from defeating Biden at the ballot box? The same people who got humiliated and destroyed in court for their actions? The same people who are now squealing like victimized stuck pigs and desperately pleading the 5th as they get held to account for actions?

Yeah, THOSE people. Sucker.

 

[Marener]

Says who?

The people who tried to take him down using Biden's Department of Justice and prevent him from defeating Biden at the ballot box? The same people who got humiliated and destroyed in court for their actions? The same people who are now squealing like stuck pigs and pleading the 5th as they get held to account for actions?

Yeah, THOSE people. Sucker.

Says the facts and evidence.

The prosecutors did their job. Wanna be fascists like you want to punish them for it.

 

[BackAgain]

I'm sure the uber experienced and skilled Jack Smith will get a good laugh out of whatever incompetent idiots the fat rapist sends after him in court.

How many times did uber experienced and skilled Smith get *****-slapped on appeals of his convictions?

The people literally trying to desperate defend those who tried to take down their political enemies and getting exposed for it are now screaming about justice being "corrupted by politics"??



Unf*cking real!

You're trying to be extra stupid today, aren't you?

They don’t “try.”

It’s all natural.

 

[Mick2]

Says the facts and evidence.

Says who? Do we listen to the deranged in society or our court system which so thoroughly defeated Biden's criminal cabal on this exact claim?

The prosecutors did their job. Wanna be fascists like you want to punish them for it.

Yeah, the job was to eliminate the threat of Biden's biggest political threat. They failed in epic fashion!

And if you think they did nothing wrong then they can have their day in court to defend THEMSELVES and their actions, right?

5th amendment incoming for Biden's cabal!

 

[Marener]

Says who? Do we listen to the deranged in society or our court system which so thoroughly defeated Biden's criminal cabal?


Yeah, the job was to eliminate the threat of Biden's biggest political threat. They failed in epic fashion!

And if you think they did nothing wrong then they can have their day in court to defend THEMSELVES and their actions, right?

5th amendment incoming for Biden's cabal!

The job was to prosecute criminals, one of which is Trump. You can’t challenge the facts or the evidence. Neither could Trump.

 

[Blisterfinger]

So? If he does it 1000 more times, he might catch up to the fat rapist charity thief.

Maybe he can achieve the brain dead level of Joe Biden and not face any consequences because of it.

 

[Mick2]

The job was to prosecute criminals

And "criminals" in this case was code for Biden's chief political threat. They made unconstitutional claims and charges in court. And as such, they failed epically.

You can’t challenge the facts or the evidence

What "facts and evidence". You haven't presented anything to challenge, dummy! The "facts and evidence" are that courts struck down Smith's charges against President Trump as unconstitutional. That is what we call a fact. We have the rulings of the court on one hand and we have the squealings of the deranged and severely mentally ill on the other. Who shall we believe? LOL. Now we get to uncover Smiths' motives and actions for such horrific actions. The 5th amendment has been flying ever since!

 

[Marener]

And "criminals" in this case was code for Biden's chief political threat. They failed epically.

What "facts and evidence". You have presented anything to challenge, dummy! The "facts and evidence" are that courts struck down Smith's charges against President Trump as unconstitutional. That is what we call a fact. Now we get to uncover Smiths' motives and actions. The 5th amendment has been flying!

It wasn’t code. It was criminals who committed crimes.

The facts and evidence were presented in Jack Smith’s indictments and have never been successfully challenged in court. The charges were never struck down as “unconstitutional”.

 

[Mick2]

It wasn’t code. It was criminals who committed crimes.

Charges and violations of defendant's rights and the Constitution are not evidence of crimes by a defendant, dummy. They certainly COULD be crimes by those who brought them, however, depending on motive and who was involved. This is the stage we are at. Investigating the why and how for these violations of the COTUS in an attempt to take down a political foe. The 5th amendment has been flying by Smith's cronies ever since!

The facts and evidence were presented in Jack Smith’s indictments and have never been successfully challenged in court.

Yes, the charges were successfully challenged and thrown out by the courts because they were unconstitutional. Smith was told to go back to the drawing board and start all over and stop being a total sap and loser by the SCOTUS. Why did Smith humiliate himself and try to actually tell the Supreme Court that a President doesn't have immunity on official acts? WTF? That's the sign of a desperate man trying to go around the Constitution and **** it just to take down Biden's threat. That's horrific. There's the EVIDENCE.

 

[Marener]

Charges and violations of defendant's rights that violate are Constitution are not crimes. They certainly COULD be crimes by those who brought them, however, depending on motive and who was involved. This is the stage we are at. Investigating the why and how for these violations of the COTUS in an attempt to take down a political foe. The 5th amendment has been flying by Smith's cronies ever since!



Yes, the charges were successfully challenged and thrown out by the courts because they were unconstitutional. Why did Smith humiliate himself and try to actually tell the Supreme Court that a President doesn't have immunity on official acts? WTF? That's the sign of a desperate man trying to go around the Constitution and **** it just to take down Biden's threat. That's horrific. There's the EVIDENCE.

There’s no evidence that Jack Smith or anyone in his investigation violated anyone’s rights.

No one ever thought the President had immunity for official acts before, as this was a landmark SCOTUS decision which was invented whole cloth (nothing in the constitution says anything about immunity for the President).

The charges weren’t thrown out. Smith returned to court with a slightly altered indictment because Trump’s fraudulent attempt to steal an election was not an official act.

 

[Mick2]

There’s no evidence that Jack Smith or anyone in his investigation violated anyone’s rights.

Bullshit. His charges got zapped because the court deemed them unconstitutional and he was told to go back to the drawing board and see if he could find charges that didn't violate the Constitution if he wanted to continue the case. Smith wasn't even sure how to proceed and they were at a loss. It banged around in desperation for a few months and then fell apart completely after 11/5 when Smith slinked away in shame.

The case was a complete farce. Any prosecutor that would go in front of the SCOTUS and try to declare the President is never immune for official acts while in office is a political goon and incompetent fool. Smith was desperate and doing the bidding of his masters who were also desperate at that point to eliminate Trump as a political threat. They lost big time in the courts.

Period. The case is over. How it played out IS not in dispute.

No one ever thought the President had immunity for official acts before, as this was a landmark SCOTUS decision which was invented whole cloth (nothing in the constitution says anything about immunity for the President).

You are amazingly dumb!

And Smith must have been dumber than even you if he actually thought this argument was legitimate. Fact is he was desperate to eliminate Trump because his masters were going to lose to Trump. Instead of admitting his foolishness he tried to throw a hail mary to the SCOTUS that in reality had 0% of ever being deemed Constitutional. These are people that should be investigated for these egregious political acts.

 

[Marener]

Bullshit. His charges got zapped because the court deemed them unconstitutional and he was told to go back to the drawing board and see if he could find charges that didn't violate the Constitution if he wanted to continue the case. Smith wasn't even sure how to proceed and they were at a loss. It banged around in desperation for a few months and then fell apart completely after 11/5 when Smith slinked away in shame.

The case was a complete farce. Any prosecutor that would go in front of the SCOTUS and try to declare the President is never immune for official acts while in office is a political goon and incompetent fool. Smith was desperate and doing the bidding of his masters who were also desperate at that point to eliminate Trump as a political threat. They lost big time in the courts.

Period. The case is over. How it played out IS not in dispute.







You are amazingly dumb!

And Smith must have been dumber than even you if he actually thought this argument was legitimate. Fact is he was desperate to eliminate Trump because his masters were going to lose to Trump. Instead of admitting his foolishness he tried to throw a hail mary to the SCOTUS that in reality had 0% of ever being deemed Constitutional. These are people that should be investigated for these egregious political acts.

Nowhere does the constitution say the president is immune from prosecution for official acts. SCOTUS had to invent this.

Regardless, Smith filed an amended indictment after the immunity decision with the exact same 4 charges as before. SCOTUS didn’t find the charges unconstitutional at all, because fraudulently stealing an election is not an official act.

You still haven’t handled any of the facts and evidence.

 

[Augustine_]

The embarrassed party is the former prosecutor who took the fifth like a street thug.

Trump invokes Fifth Amendment nearly 450 times in N.Y. AG’s civil probe of his business practices

An attorney for Trump said the former president answered only one question, about his name, during the four-hour deposition.

www.nbcnews.com

 

[Dragonlady]

https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/republicans-judiciary.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/2025-11-19-jdj-to-doj-re-windom-referral.pdf

The House Committee can refer anyone they want for prosecution but you need evidence and a grand jury to get charges.