Manafort juror says one holdout prevented conviction on all charges

[Political Junky]

Well, I guess that clears things up.

https://nypost.com/2018/08/23/manafort-juror-says-one-holdout-prevented-conviction-on-all-charges/

Juror Paula Duncan spoke to Fox News one day after the jury returned a guilty verdict against Manafort on eight financial crime counts and deadlocked on 10 others.

“It was one person who kept the verdict from being guilty on all 18 counts,” Duncan, 52, told the network.

 

[centerleftFL]

Whoops! We had the same thought or read the same story at the same time. Amazing wasn't it! And of course she went to FOX.

 

[mudwhistle]

Well, I guess that clears things up.

https://nypost.com/2018/08/23/manafort-juror-says-one-holdout-prevented-conviction-on-all-charges/

Juror Paula Duncan spoke to Fox News one day after the jury returned a guilty verdict against Manafort on eight financial crime counts and deadlocked on 10 others.

“It was one person who kept the verdict from being guilty on all 18 counts,” Duncan, 52, told the network.

So only one jurist had a conscience.

 

[DrLove]

Well, I guess that clears things up.

https://nypost.com/2018/08/23/manafort-juror-says-one-holdout-prevented-conviction-on-all-charges/

Juror Paula Duncan spoke to Fox News one day after the jury returned a guilty verdict against Manafort on eight financial crime counts and deadlocked on 10 others.

“It was one person who kept the verdict from being guilty on all 18 counts,” Duncan, 52, told the network.

Yep - this was my prediction. There would be one hardened Trump loyalist who never should have been allowed on this jury.
I think Feds should retry the other 10 ... Should be 18 for 18.

 

[mudwhistle]

Well, I guess that clears things up.

https://nypost.com/2018/08/23/manafort-juror-says-one-holdout-prevented-conviction-on-all-charges/

Juror Paula Duncan spoke to Fox News one day after the jury returned a guilty verdict against Manafort on eight financial crime counts and deadlocked on 10 others.

“It was one person who kept the verdict from being guilty on all 18 counts,” Duncan, 52, told the network.

Yep - this was my prediction. There would be one hardened Trump loyalist who never should have been allowed on this jury.
I think Feds should retry the other 10 ... Should be 18 for 18.

I wonder how many hardened anti-Trumpsters were on that jury?

 

[dave p]

Well, I guess that clears things up.

https://nypost.com/2018/08/23/manafort-juror-says-one-holdout-prevented-conviction-on-all-charges/

Juror Paula Duncan spoke to Fox News one day after the jury returned a guilty verdict against Manafort on eight financial crime counts and deadlocked on 10 others.

“It was one person who kept the verdict from being guilty on all 18 counts,” Duncan, 52, told the network.

Yep - this was my prediction. There would be one hardened Trump loyalist who never should have been allowed on this jury.
I think Feds should retry the other 10 ... Should be 18 for 18.

This is exactly how a jury works. However, because you don't like the outcome, you want to throw it out and start all over. You assume it is a Trump loyalist that held it back. Did you notice that the Avid trump supporter voted guilty on all counts? Your theory doesn't hold water.

 

[Silent Warrior]

Well, I guess that clears things up.

https://nypost.com/2018/08/23/manafort-juror-says-one-holdout-prevented-conviction-on-all-charges/

Juror Paula Duncan spoke to Fox News one day after the jury returned a guilty verdict against Manafort on eight financial crime counts and deadlocked on 10 others.

“It was one person who kept the verdict from being guilty on all 18 counts,” Duncan, 52, told the network.

Yep - this was my prediction. There would be one hardened Trump loyalist who never should have been allowed on this jury.
I think Feds should retry the other 10 ... Should be 18 for 18.

I wonder how many hardened anti-Trumpsters were on that jury?

11

 

[BlackFlag]

The party of "law and order" wants to legalize all the crimes Manafort committed so that his type can continue committing them. Truly despicable.

 

[Wyatt earp]

The party of "law and order" wants to legalize all the crimes Manafort committed so that his type can continue committing them. Truly despicable.

Once again I ask what do we pay the IRS for???


If you would bother to read it she also said he never would of got caught if their was no special prosecutor, 12 lawyers and millions of dollars thrown at it ..

 

[JakeStarkey]

The federal juror experts know now what to look for in the retrial on these charges.

 

[WTP]

Probably a Trump a

Well, I guess that clears things up.

https://nypost.com/2018/08/23/manafort-juror-says-one-holdout-prevented-conviction-on-all-charges/

Juror Paula Duncan spoke to Fox News one day after the jury returned a guilty verdict against Manafort on eight financial crime counts and deadlocked on 10 others.

“It was one person who kept the verdict from being guilty on all 18 counts,” Duncan, 52, told the network.

Probably a Trump apologist.

 

[WTP]

Then thank

The party of "law and order" wants to legalize all the crimes Manafort committed so that his type can continue committing them. Truly despicable.

Once again I ask what do we pay the IRS for???


If you would bother to read it she also said he never would of got caught if their was no special prosecutor, 12 lawyers and millions of dollars thrown at it ..

Then thank
goodness for law enforcement right? Or are you a cheerleader for criminals?

 

[blackhawk]

That’s how a jury works if you don’t believe a person is guilty you don’t vote that way if you believe they are guilty you do. If anyone here was on trial for something would you want a member of jury voting with the majority just so they could go along to get along?

 

[WTP]

That’s how a jury works if you don’t believe a person is guilty you don’t vote that way if you believe they are guilty you do. If anyone here was on trial for something would you want a member of jury voting with the majority just so they could go along to get along?

I expect honesty and truthfulness, no matter who you are. Right or Left.

The problem we have today is, we are dealing with the most criminal administration in U.S. history. No presidency has ever come this close, with so much legal liability looming. That's the big difference. Beyond that, the answer to your question is a resounding yes.

 

[blackhawk]

That’s how a jury works if you don’t believe a person is guilty you don’t vote that way if you believe they are guilty you do. If anyone here was on trial for something would you want a member of jury voting with the majority just so they could go along to get along?

I expect honesty and truthfulness, no matter who you are. Right or Left.

The problem we have today is, we are dealing with the most criminal administration in U.S. history. No presidency has ever come this close, with so much legal liability looming. That's the big difference. Beyond that, the answer to your question is a resounding yes.

The onlylegal liability looming is that in the fantasy land between your ears.

 

[rightwinger]

Well, I guess that clears things up.

https://nypost.com/2018/08/23/manafort-juror-says-one-holdout-prevented-conviction-on-all-charges/

Juror Paula Duncan spoke to Fox News one day after the jury returned a guilty verdict against Manafort on eight financial crime counts and deadlocked on 10 others.

“It was one person who kept the verdict from being guilty on all 18 counts,” Duncan, 52, told the network.

Trump voter

 

[Darkman00]

Dupe ))


Fox News : Manafort juror reveals lone holdout prevented Mueller team from convicting on all counts

 

[Maxdeath]

That’s how a jury works if you don’t believe a person is guilty you don’t vote that way if you believe they are guilty you do. If anyone here was on trial for something would you want a member of jury voting with the majority just so they could go along to get along?

I expect honesty and truthfulness, no matter who you are. Right or Left.

The problem we have today is, we are dealing with the most criminal administration in U.S. history. No presidency has ever come this close, with so much legal liability looming. That's the big difference. Beyond that, the answer to your question is a resounding yes.

You must have a really short memory. The last administration had everyone beat.
Bomb a hospital. Check.
Use IRS as own brown shirt squad. Check.
Give large taxpayer gift to campaign sponsor. Check.
Allow CIA to spy on congress. Check.
Allow NSA to spy on citizens. Check.

Do we need to continue through all 20?

 

[WTP]

That’s how a jury works if you don’t believe a person is guilty you don’t vote that way if you believe they are guilty you do. If anyone here was on trial for something would you want a member of jury voting with the majority just so they could go along to get along?

I expect honesty and truthfulness, no matter who you are. Right or Left.

The problem we have today is, we are dealing with the most criminal administration in U.S. history. No presidency has ever come this close, with so much legal liability looming. That's the big difference. Beyond that, the answer to your question is a resounding yes.

You must have a really short memory. The last administration had everyone beat.
Bomb a hospital. Check.
Use IRS as own brown shirt squad. Check.
Give large taxpayer gift to campaign sponsor. Check.
Allow CIA to spy on congress. Check.
Allow NSA to spy on citizens. Check.

Do we need to continue through all 20?

Going off topic and searching old news about others, is totally irrelevant. Today is what counts. Stay focused.

 

[WTP]

That’s how a jury works if you don’t believe a person is guilty you don’t vote that way if you believe they are guilty you do. If anyone here was on trial for something would you want a member of jury voting with the majority just so they could go along to get along?

I expect honesty and truthfulness, no matter who you are. Right or Left.

The problem we have today is, we are dealing with the most criminal administration in U.S. history. No presidency has ever come this close, with so much legal liability looming. That's the big difference. Beyond that, the answer to your question is a resounding yes.

The onlylegal liability looming is that in the fantasy land between your ears.

Really? And yet, we find out tonight that the Trump organization is the latest victim in a civil and criminal investigation, into shady payoffs to porn stars and tax crimes because of the Cohen guilty pleas. They are eyeing charges. And his family is implicated in the crimes. Which are state crimes. Of which, his family cannot be pardoned. If this is a "fantasy", I'm sure loving fantasies right now.