Man who called Dems "parasites" on billboard receives welfare millions

[topspin]

YEA you do.. sure.

Wow...Cut to the quick by yet another one of your stunningly fact-packed posts!

indeed. All one has to do is check your posts for A) demonization of liberal advocating handouts or B) demonization of all handouts. You don't have to start screeching with reproach just because your track record proves how full of shit you are. But, I guess such is an option if you really, really want to fell like less of a shill than you convey yourself to be.

Oh snap, another white trash republican lite burn. Shit go easy on him shogun, he's obviously struggling to be the top dog in his trailer park.

 

[Oddball]

indeed. All one has to do is check your posts for A) demonization of liberal advocating handouts or B) demonization of all handouts. You don't have to start screeching with reproach just because your track record proves how full of shit you are. But, I guess such is an option if you really, really want to fell like less of a shill than you convey yourself to be.

I only just today called the "war" on (some) drugs as a defacto welfare program for both DEA agents and drug hoodlums.

That you ignore statement like that is your problem.

BTW, I didn't know you were in charge of keeping score on my "track record". Care to come up with something a little more substantive than your mere say-so?

 

[Oddball]

Oh snap, another white trash republican lite burn. Shit go easy on him shogun, he's obviously struggling to be the top dog in his trailer park.

You know two things about me, Sparky:

Jack

and

Squat

 

[Shogun]

indeed. All one has to do is check your posts for A) demonization of liberal advocating handouts or B) demonization of all handouts. You don't have to start screeching with reproach just because your track record proves how full of shit you are. But, I guess such is an option if you really, really want to fell like less of a shill than you convey yourself to be.

I only just today called the "war" on (some) drugs as a defacto welfare program for both DEA agents and drug hoodlums.

That you ignore statement like that is your problem.

BTW, I didn't know you were in charge of keeping score on my "track record". Care to come up with something a little more substantive than your mere say-so?

YEA! and how does that ONE example weigh against your usual BOOO HISSSSS EVIL LIBERALS tripe?





yea, like I said. Case closed.

 

[topspin]

Oh snap, another white trash republican lite burn. Shit go easy on him shogun, he's obviously struggling to be the top dog in his trailer park.

You know two things about me, Sparky:

Jack

and

Squat

your lazy and whiny that you proved to me in 2 days you fucking bum. Get a real job.

 

[Oddball]

So, neither of you got anything...Just as I suspected.

 

[Oddball]

indeed. All one has to do is check your posts for A) demonization of liberal advocating handouts or B) demonization of all handouts. You don't have to start screeching with reproach just because your track record proves how full of shit you are. But, I guess such is an option if you really, really want to fell like less of a shill than you convey yourself to be.

I only just today called the "war" on (some) drugs as a defacto welfare program for both DEA agents and drug hoodlums.

That you ignore statement like that is your problem.

BTW, I didn't know you were in charge of keeping score on my "track record". Care to come up with something a little more substantive than your mere say-so?

YEA! and how does that ONE example weigh against your usual BOOO HISSSSS EVIL LIBERALS tripe?





yea, like I said. Case closed.

Who is in charge right now?...Progressive socialist "liberals, that's who.

Anybody who knows me (which excludes you) knows I spend eight years blasting Dubya and his neoconnie glee club.

Case closed, you still lose.

 

[Shogun]

So, neither of you got anything...Just as I suspected.

well, except for the hammer and nail that i've pinned you to the wall with. But hey.. go ahead and pretend that your forum input doesn't make this whole "both equally" tangent a giant punchline.

seriously.

 

[sangha]

I don't have my hand out, first of all.

Secondly, the real hypocrisy here is amongst the progressive socialist do-gooders, like you, who whine-n-cry-moan about the sainted pooooooooooooor, while decrying those who end up on the receiving end of it as ingrate moochers, for no more good reason than their regional politics.

Just doesn't jive for people so supposedly hung up on their self-proclaimed high standards of compassion and non-judgmental mindset...But those of us with any brains never fell for that cheap façade to begin with.

You are full of shit. Had this man not been so ironically brazen about criticism of handouts, while taking handouts, then you wouldn't find yourself crying about liberal hypocrisy as if your selective charge isn't three shades of hilarious.


you are about as credible as Dick Cheney commenting on shotgun safety mechanisms..

So, he's a hypocrite...I said that in #4.

That still doesn't excuse the brazen sanctimony of the left, in constantly mewling about how rural areas get more in welfare handouts than do the urban areas, while refusing to reign in that spending or its abuses.

More than enough hypocrisy to go around here, Skippy.

Dude, concentrate!!!

This thread is about the sanctimony of a rightwing scumbag, not liberals.

Your compulsion to whine about democrats proves your partisan bias. Too bad you're chicken to even admit that you're right wing.

 

[Shogun]

I only just today called the "war" on (some) drugs as a defacto welfare program for both DEA agents and drug hoodlums.

That you ignore statement like that is your problem.

BTW, I didn't know you were in charge of keeping score on my "track record". Care to come up with something a little more substantive than your mere say-so?

YEA! and how does that ONE example weigh against your usual BOOO HISSSSS EVIL LIBERALS tripe?





yea, like I said. Case closed.

Who is in charge right now?...Progressive socialist "liberals, that's who.

Anybody who knows me (which excludes you) knows I spend eight years blasting Dubya and his neoconnie glee club.

Case closed, you still lose.

YEA you did.. sure.







Quick! go rip that W bumper sticker off of your ride!

 

[sangha]

YEA! and how does that ONE example weigh against your usual BOOO HISSSSS EVIL LIBERALS tripe?





yea, like I said. Case closed.

Who is in charge right now?...Progressive socialist "liberals, that's who.

Anybody who knows me (which excludes you) knows I spend eight years blasting Dubya and his neoconnie glee club.

Case closed, you still lose.

YEA you did.. sure.







Quick! go rip that W bumper sticker off of your ride!

Actually, he might be telling the truth. The Dude won't even stand up for himself, so why should anyone think he'd stand up for bush or anyone else

A Dude who stands for nothing, falls for anything

 

[Oddball]

That I don't go rushing in to respond to each and every post of trolls and half wits is not failure to "defend myself"...It's merely not suffering and indulging said trolls and half wits as much as they'd like.

 

[sangha]

That I don't go rushing in to respond to each and every post of trolls and half wits is not failure to "defend myself"...It's merely not suffering and indulging said trolls and half wits as much as they'd like.

I see.

You keep responding to our posts because you don't want to respond to us

 

[blu]

Providing a military, framework for a court system, maintaining national sovereignty, and that's about it.

you mean follow the constitution? what a crazy idea you KOOK!

 

[topspin]

the dude is poor white trash, thinks minorities are holding him down.

 

[Shogun]

the dude is poor white trash, thinks minorities are holding him down.

to be honest I don't know what the dude's economic background is and i really don't care.

 

[Toro]

You misunderstand. I'm not saying the US wasn't prosperous before WWII compared to today/

I'm saying that, by the standards of the time (ie 1918-1931) we were not a prosperous nation.

What standards are those?

Certainly, the Depression made the country poorer, but prior to that in the 1920s, the country was as prosperous as it have ever been, and was doing much better than Europe, which was still recovering from the devastation of WWI.

not quite toro....it was the roaring twenties for ONLY THE ELITE....

Income was stagnant for the average American in the 1920s, but ...

... the nation has a whole was more prosperous, and it was more prosperous than it was 20, 30, 50 years earlier.

 

[sangha]

What standards are those?

Certainly, the Depression made the country poorer, but prior to that in the 1920s, the country was as prosperous as it have ever been, and was doing much better than Europe, which was still recovering from the devastation of WWI.

not quite toro....it was the roaring twenties for ONLY THE ELITE....

Income was stagnant for the average American in the 1920s, but ...

... the nation has a whole was more prosperous, and it was more prosperous than it was 20, 30, 50 years earlier.

Actually, I have to admit you do have a point, but only because I was careless in defining what I meant by prosperous. I assumed (my mistake) that given the nature of the discussion it would be clear that I meant that the people would be prosperous, and not just a few.

Bottom line, you're not wrong, but I disagree. An economic policy that rewards the few is not how the rightwing sells their eco policy so IMO, showing that rightwing eco policy rewards the few does not show that the rightwing economic theory is correct, which was the intention of my challenge - to get a rightwinger to defend their economic claims.

However, I take responsibility for not being clearer about that and must acknowledge that what you say is one way to measure prosperity and that by that measure, you are right. If you missed addressing my intended challenge, it is only because I worded it poorly.

 

[xotoxi]

But when did the U.S. surpass England as the world's leading industrial producer?....Far in advance of the turn of the 20th century, that much is for sure.

I don't know. I'm not sure. Sometime in the late 19th century I think.

All I'm saying is that America was great then and is great now.

The question has nothing to do with "greatness" and nothing to do with surpassing Englands' industrial production

The question is to name a nation that became and remained prosperous by following Dudes model for the fed govt. So far, the dude is too scared to do it

Is Dude scared?

Or is he cold and wet?

 

[Toro]

I don't know. I'm not sure. Sometime in the late 19th century I think.

All I'm saying is that America was great then and is great now.

The question has nothing to do with "greatness" and nothing to do with surpassing Englands' industrial production

The question is to name a nation that became and remained prosperous by following Dudes model for the fed govt. So far, the dude is too scared to do it

Is Dude scared?

Or is he cold and wet?