I've long been aware of “boneless chicken wings” and thought them a valid concept. Chicken wings, as popular as they are in certain contexts, are rather difficult and inefficient to eat, as they contain little meat, and a lot of bone from which to separate the meat, with some difficulty. I do not find the in that form to be worth the trouble of eating them. I've always assumed that “boneless chicken wings” were made of the same meat, somehow separated from the bone, and in that form, I've occasionally had and enjoyed them.
It seems that the basis for this lawsuit is that the “boneless chicken wings” are not actually made from wing meat, but from breast meat. I don't know that one meat is really any better than the other, but that seems like a valid basis for a false advertising lawsuit, if something is advertised to imply that it is one kind of meat, when it is really a different meat.