Major Climate Change Study Retracted

Hafar1014

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
11,770
Reaction score
10,698
Points
2,128
From the Wall Street Journal 12/10 A synopsis

Germanys Potsdamn Inst. For Climate Impact Research Projected climate change
would cause 38 trillion in economic damage a year by 2049.

They also predicted rising CO2 would cause a reduction in Global GDP by 2100.
Their conclusion was the damage in the next 25 years would exceed the cost of stopping global warming by 6 times.
Climate change fanatics claimed look it cost more not to do anything!!!! Were all going to die !!!!!

Well guess what. It was all bullshit.

Scientists who read the study found serious math errors. "rows of data were wrongly printed as decimals not a percentage point." When corrected the results were insignificant
The study had so many errors Nature the publisher has retracted the study
So once again the climate change lie is exposed and falls apart because climate scientists cant do math.
This report wins the Hafar1014 Male cow feces award for Progressive Scientific stupidity
Its a pile of you know what on a nice wooden platform
1765398258973.webp
 
Last edited:
From the Wall Street Journal 12/10 A synopsis

Germanys Potsdamn Inst. For Climate Impact Research Projected climate change
would cause 38 trillion in economic damage a year by 2049.

They also predicted rising CO2 would cause a reduction in Global GDP by 2100.
Their conclusion was the damage in the next 25 years would exceed the cost of stopping global warming by 6 time.
Climate change fanatics claimed look it cost more not to do anything!!!! Were all going to die !!!!!

Well guess what. It was all bullshit.

Scientists who read the study found serious math errors. "rows of data were wrongly printed as decimals not a percentage point." When corrected the results were significant
The study had so many errors Nature the publisher has retracted the study
So once again the climate change lie is exposed and falls apart because climate scientists cant do math.
This report wins the Hafar1014 Male cow feces award for Progressive Scientific stupidity
Its a pile of you know what on a nice wooden platform
View attachment 1192393
The climate change racket was and continues to be heavily promoted by Chinas MSS. An agency that ran the most successful, multi-operational campaign for decades. Perhaps the most successful in the history of the world. I mean truly mean that and as much as I begrudgingly respect their accomplishments, I can't deny their successes/

When people say "wow, those Russian (or Chinese) sleeper cells remain quiet for a decade before becoming operational, they are really patient", that pales in comparison to having thousands of agents and/or assets/influencers across a broad swath of Western industries and pillars of society to isolate and pick off one success after another.

I'd love to peek inside CIA or FBI files to see what they have gleaned over the years.

Just from the top of my head, education in America, politicians in California and New York specifically, NGOs, media outlets to promote agendas such as mass migration after the Syrian war (among many others), the climate change racket, gaming the economic information requirements to remain listed on the NYSE and other indexes, accessing Western markets and flooding them with heavily subsidized products until they force the shutting down of Western companies and create a de facto monopoly.

Really I could write a thesis on their successes. This isn't normal free market economic success, this is a dedicated, national campaign of all-out war on America in particular.

One has to wonder, if Trump didn't win in 2016, and, if covid hadn't happened and exposed the influence China had on international agencies such as the WHO and the iron grip they had on critical medical and supplies, would America have woken up?

If Hillary won, what direction would the U.S have gone?
 
From the Wall Street Journal 12/10 A synopsis

Germanys Potsdamn Inst. For Climate Impact Research Projected climate change
would cause 38 trillion in economic damage a year by 2049.

They also predicted rising CO2 would cause a reduction in Global GDP by 2100.
Their conclusion was the damage in the next 25 years would exceed the cost of stopping global warming by 6 times.
Climate change fanatics claimed look it cost more not to do anything!!!! Were all going to die !!!!!

Well guess what. It was all bullshit.

Scientists who read the study found serious math errors. "rows of data were wrongly printed as decimals not a percentage point." When corrected the results were insignificant
The study had so many errors Nature the publisher has retracted the study
So once again the climate change lie is exposed and falls apart because climate scientists cant do math.
This report wins the Hafar1014 Male cow feces award for Progressive Scientific stupidity
Its a pile of you know what on a nice wooden platform
View attachment 1192393

At what point will they decide to admit that Climate Change is a function of Electro Magnetic Forces from the Sun and Galactic centre ?
I guess they want to delay Sheeple madness a little longer .

Very very soon they are going to be forced to admit that the Magnetic Poles are moving faster and faster and that our planet's magnetic force field is weakening disastrously .

The former hints at a Poles reversal event ( likely extinction ) and the latter hints at a literal planet burn out if another Carrington event occurs . Or much worse .
Every computer , phone , light would burn out .
Freezing death whilst starving and dehydrated .
 
The climate change racket was and continues to be heavily promoted by Chinas MSS. An agency that ran the most successful, multi-operational campaign for decades. Perhaps the most successful in the history of the world. I mean truly mean that and as much as I begrudgingly respect their accomplishments, I can't deny their successes/

When people say "wow, those Russian (or Chinese) sleeper cells remain quiet for a decade before becoming operational, they are really patient", that pales in comparison to having thousands of agents and/or assets/influencers across a broad swath of Western industries and pillars of society to isolate and pick off one success after another.

I'd love to peek inside CIA or FBI files to see what they have gleaned over the years.

Just from the top of my head, education in America, politicians in California and New York specifically, NGOs, media outlets to promote agendas such as mass migration after the Syrian war (among many others), the climate change racket, gaming the economic information requirements to remain listed on the NYSE and other indexes, accessing Western markets and flooding them with heavily subsidized products until they force the shutting down of Western companies and create a de facto monopoly.

Really I could write a thesis on their successes. This isn't normal free market economic success, this is a dedicated, national campaign of all-out war on America in particular.

One has to wonder, if Trump didn't win in 2016, and, if covid hadn't happened and exposed the influence China had on international agencies such as the WHO and the iron grip they had on critical medical and supplies, would America have woken up?

If Hillary won, what direction would the U.S have gone?
Me too
 
From the Wall Street Journal 12/10 A synopsis

Germanys Potsdamn Inst. For Climate Impact Research Projected climate change
would cause 38 trillion in economic damage a year by 2049.

They also predicted rising CO2 would cause a reduction in Global GDP by 2100.
Their conclusion was the damage in the next 25 years would exceed the cost of stopping global warming by 6 times.
Climate change fanatics claimed look it cost more not to do anything!!!! Were all going to die !!!!!

Well guess what. It was all bullshit.

Scientists who read the study found serious math errors. "rows of data were wrongly printed as decimals not a percentage point." When corrected the results were insignificant
The study had so many errors Nature the publisher has retracted the study
So once again the climate change lie is exposed and falls apart because climate scientists cant do math.
This report wins the Hafar1014 Male cow feces award for Progressive Scientific stupidity
Its a pile of you know what on a nice wooden platform
View attachment 1192393
Why does our dying bastard of a president want Greenland again?
 
View attachment 1192414

I thought this was supposed to happen YEARS AGO!
Another thing they omit.

Whoopsie daisy.
most hiax deniers
don't know the difference
between searise & erosion.

And sinking fast without a foundation.
Another thing we don't see
is people unloading beachfronts
at firesale prices,
unless they know something we don't.
 
Why does our dying bastard of a president want Greenland again?
National security, end of story. There is more to this but that is the crux of it.

If I were to expand conservatively, Id also suggest that the EU arent going in the right direction socially, culturally, spiritually or militarily. That is perhaps an understatement, and America can no longer rely on them or associate their fate with the EUs who have rarely carried their weight, certainly less so when the world in their foolish greed and naive world view allowed Communist China into the WTO. Clearly China went right to work to influence and weaken the EU and the West.

The world changes. Denmark and their bureaucratic friends in the E.U want to hark back to a time that no longer exists.

You know Roosevelt viewed Churchill as a monarchist, for which he and America were inherently in opposition too. Churchill, in his often drunk stupor, lost credibility with both Stalin and Roosevelt as Germany had in effect, sunk the British Empire through WWI and WWIII.

In essence, Empires fail primarily due to the pompous arrogance of the overlord who misuse their subjects. Puerto Rico want to be in Americas sphere because they know its best for them, economically and socially.

Greenland can choose their destiny but Russia and China (especially) definitely do not want America to have broader influence there. Why do the EU who talk a great game but never walk one want to maintain a state in time that no longer exists?

Speak to America and negotiate. Just ridding themselves of tariffs for say a 50 year period might agreeable to America and it would pay many billions in dividends to the citizens and businesses of Denmark.
 
Biggest scam of our lifetimes and millions still believe it.

I believe that your comment is basically accurate but what you expressed is an idea that can easily be taken too far?

Once we know the truth about WHY Ocean levels worldwide were stable for the previous decades, [and actually for many centuries], we will know that ocean levels could certainly rise in the future, [under certain conditions].

The massive amount of H2O that has cracked and slid off the LAND BASED Greenland Ice Sheet over the past thirty years as icebergs, plus the amount of H2O that has melted off the world glaciers is essentially the exact same amount of H2O that has been ADDED AS ICE TO THE MASSIVE ANTARCTIC ICE SHEETS?!

That is why ocean levels have stayed but Mr. Al Gore and Mr. Bill Gates, [or at least the people who invest in both Al Gore and Bill Gates], may perhaps NOT want you to know about this because A Carbon Tax WAS SEEN AS THE WAY TO GAIN TOTAL CONTROL over the economy of even the USA and Canada, so that the Bill Gates "Innovating to zero" plan could go into effect and force!

"Let us consider Antarctica for a moment.
We have already seen that it is big. It has a land area of 5.5
million square miles, and is presently covered by something in excess
of seven million cubic miles of ice weighing an estimated 19
quadrillion tons (19 followed by 15 zeros). What worries the
theorists of earth-crust displacement is that this vast ice-cap is
remorselessly increasing in size and weight:'at the rate of 293 cubic
miles of ice each year--almost as much as if Lake Ontario were frozen

solidly annually and added to it.(Graham Hancock, Fingerprints of
the Gods, page 480).

"At a symposium of the Union of Geodesy and geophysics, Dr. Pyyotor Shoumsky reported that the south polar ice cap was growing at a minimum rate of 293 cubic miles of ice annually. To put that number in perspective, Lake Erie contains only 109 cubic miles of water. Thus, a volume of ice forms on top of the existing ice at Antarctica each year which is almost three times the volume of water in Lake Erie!" (Expanded Discussion of The HAB Theory, Gershom Gale, Expanded Discussion on the HAB Theory.)

I believe that I should give you the entire article by Mr. Gershom Gale in order to fill in some important details in all of this:


Expanded Discussion of The HAB Theory
Gershom Gale gershon1
@netvision.net.il


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Geophysical science offers rather thin explanations for the periods of history during which great glaciers advanced and retreated from the polar regions, leaving a great deal of physical evidence.

The more one delves into the actual evidence, the more skeptical one becomes of the existing theories. The truth, according to the HAB Theory, is that periodically - at intervals ranging from 3,000 to 7000 years but averaging around 5,500 years apart - great global cataclysms have occurred which destroyed virtually all of whatever life forms or civilizations had developed on the Earth to that point.

The cataclysms occur when the Earth is thrown off balance due to a massive, unbalanced accumulation of ice at the polar regions. As these polar ice caps grow, their enormous weight, accumulating unevenly as it does, creates an imbalance, and a wobble begins to develop in the rotation of the Earth on its axis. Year by year, as the ice caps grow, this eccentricity increases until, with devastating suddenness, the polar masses are thrown toward the point of greatest spin, which is the equator. Quite abruptly, the areas which were polar now become equatorial, and vice versa.

The resultant cataclysm is, of course monumental across the entire face of the Earth, except at the two points which become pivotal when the capsizing effect occurs.


An Analogy:

Picture the Earth as a round ball spinning in place on a glass table top. Imagine then, that on the uppermost part of this spinning ball, you drop a tiny glob of molten metal, just slightly off center. The ball immediately begins to wobble...

Add more weight and that wobble becomes more pronounced. Add still more and the eccentricity becomes so great the centrifugal force of the spinning ball grips the weight and turns the entire ball so that the weighted portion is thrown to the imaginary line encircling the ball where the speed is greatest - which is coincident with the imaginary line on Earth known to us as the equator.

That is precisely what happens periodically to the Earth. The buildup of ice at the poles increases until its weight is suddenly thrown some 90 degrees from pole to equator. Yes, the Earth is 26 miles greater in diameter when measured around the equator than when measured around the poles, and one might argue that this bulge provides a stability that would make such a sudden tipping unlikely. But consider: such a variance, considering the size of the planet, is far less than the manufacturing tolerances of an ivory billiard ball.

As the sun evaporates the oceans, the moisture thus released precipitates as rain or snow all over the Earth. But the snows that fall on the polar caps do not melt or flow off at anything like the rate at which they evaporate elsewhere. Snow at the poles piles up and gradually turns into glacial ice. As this process continues, the ice caps increase in size.

At a symposium of the Union of Geodesy and geophysics, Dr. Pyyotor Shoumsky reported that the south polar ice cap was growing at a minimum rate of 293 cubic miles of ice annually. To put that number in perspective, Lake Erie contains only 109 cubic miles of water. Thus, a volume of ice forms on top of the existing ice at Antarctica each year which is almost three times the volume of water in Lake Erie! That's enough= ice to form a layer one mile wide and two miles high from New York to Chicago. And this is the buildup of only one year!

These figures were confirmed by Franz Loewe of France and Malcolm Mellors of Australia. There is no mistake.

The present ice mass is considerably over 5.5 million square miles. If the South Pole were over Chicago, that would make a two-mile thick slab of ice extending from Hudson's Bay to Key West, Florida.

Even this wouldn't be a threat if the ice were perfectly centered over the Earth's axis of spin, but it is not. The wobble was discovered by astronomers in 1885. It amounted to only a fraction over an inch. By the mid 1930s, this had increased to just over six feet. In 1970, the radial movement was close to 80 yards. And right now (197, the wobble is approaching a half-mile in radius.

There is no known means of calculating the point at which rollover will occur, though the summer equinox is the most dangerous time each year. It could conceivably happen with another fraction of an inch of added eccentricity. Or the system may remain more or less stable even if the wobble worsened by another mile or more.

Eventually, though, it'll reach the point of no return and the capsizing effect will occur, with essentially no warning. Overcoming the gyroscopic stabilizing effect of the Earth's equatorial bulge, and in obedience to the laws of centrifugal force, the weight of the ice will be thrown toward the equator. The Earth will continue spinning on it's axis as before, but with some dramatic differences: The ice caps will be riding on the equator, and practically all life - Man included - will have been extinguished.

This is not just a one-time occurrence; it has happened over and over again=! There have been thousands of such rollovers, perhaps even millions, during the 4.5-billion year history of the Earth.

How much time have we got before the next capsizing occurs?

The interval between each occurrence in the past has ranged between 3,000 and 7,000 years. The longest period between tilts was just about 7,000 years, give or take 50. The physical evidence indicates that our present epoch has lasted approximately 7,500 years; we've been living on borrowed time for quite a while." [Gershom Gale]

So what type of situation could potentially cause ocean levels to rise?

1. Perhaps one or two or three large volcanoes could erupt under the West Antarctic Ice Sheet that is anchored below sea level?

2. Perhaps a massive shift of the magnetic polar north or south by five hundred miles or more could set in motion melting on the Land Based Greenland Ice Sheet.

3. I have little or no fear of a rise in atmospheric carbon dioxide partly because over the past three decades foliage on trees, grasses and other vegetation seems to be surging by about twenty five percent.

4. I suppose that an increase in solar energy hitting the earth for some reason could set in motion a significant rise in ocean levels. I do not claim to know what was being shown to Isaiah by the following comment, but this could become relevant?
The phrase "light sun seven fold" comes from Isaiah 30:26, describing a future time of divine restoration where natural light intensifies dramatically: the moon becomes as bright as the sun, and the sun becomes seven times brighter, like the light of seven days combined, signifying immense healing and joy for God's people as He binds their wounds. It symbolizes ultimate spiritual illumination and God's overwhelming presence, replacing darkness and sorrow with abundant light, a promise of hope beyond worldly troubles

Key Points about Isaiah 30:26:
  • Intense Illumination: A literal and symbolic increase in light, where earthly lights become powerful, overcoming all darkness.
  • Divine Healing: This brightness occurs when the Lord "binds up the bruise of His people and heals the stroke of their wound".
  • Symbol of Restoration: It signifies a new era of peace, joy, and God's unfailing presence after a period of judgment and suffering.
  • Context: The prophecy follows Judah's failed reliance on Egypt, promising a better, everlasting light from God instead of fleeting human alliances


The best guess that I can make as to why the truth about the ADDITION OF H2O to Antarctica may have been HIDDEN, could be that the eight thousand five hundred wealthiest people on earth, as they are advised by their one million to twenty million most highly reimbursed elected officials that they have bought and paid for, plus Hollywood A-list actors, plus C.E.O.'s of large corporations, plus the leaders behind the scenes in all the major wealthy religions of this earth......
DO NOT WANT FOR JEWS AND MUSLIMS AND CHRISTIANS AND ALL EIGHT BILLION OF US TO COOPERATE ON DELIBERATELY TURNING DESERTS GREEN!

The wealthiest of the wealthy know that only by DIVIDING US can Neo - Malthusian Economic Theory and philosophy be implemented by the true leaders of all of this earth.

Neo-Malthusianism is a modern philosophy based on Thomas Malthus's idea that population growth tends to outstrip resource availability, leading to potential ecological disaster, famine, and societal collapse; it advocates for population control, often through contraception, to prevent exceeding Earth's carrying capacity, focusing on finite resources like food, water, and energy, and emphasizing environmental degradation as a key concern. It emerged strongly in the mid-20th century (e.g., The Limits to Growth) and supports family planning, though it's criticized as pessimistic and sometimes leading to coercive policies.
 
Last edited:
15th post
I believe that your comment is basically accurate but what you expressed is an idea that can easily be taken too far?

Once we know the truth about WHY Ocean levels worldwide were stable for the previous decades, [and actually for many centuries], we will know that ocean levels could certainly rise in the future, [under certain conditions].

The massive amount of H2O that has cracked and slid off the LAND BASED Greenland Ice Sheet over the past thirty years as icebergs, plus the amount of H2O that has melted off the world glaciers is essentially the exact same amount of H2O that has been ADDED AS ICE TO THE MASSIVE ANTARCTIC ICE SHEETS?!

That is why ocean levels have stayed but Mr. Al Gore and Mr. Bill Gates, [or at least the people who invest in both Al Gore and Bill Gates], may perhaps NOT want you to know about this because A Carbon Tax WAS SEEN AS THE WAY TO GAIN TOTAL CONTROL over the economy of even the USA and Canada, so that the Bill Gates "Innovating to zero" plan could go into effect and force!





I believe that I should give you the entire article by Mr. Gershom Gale in order to fill in some important details in all of this:




So what type of situation could potentially cause ocean levels to rise?

1. Perhaps one or two or three large volcanoes could erupt under the West Antarctic Ice Sheet that is anchored below sea level?

2. Perhaps a massive shift of the magnetic polar north or south by five hundred miles or more could set in motion melting on the Land Based Greenland Ice Sheet.

3. I have little or no fear of a rise in atmospheric carbon dioxide partly because over the past three decades foliage on trees, grasses and other vegetation seems to be surging by about twenty five percent.

4. I suppose that an increase in solar energy hitting the earth for some reason could set in motion a significant rise in ocean levels. I do not claim to know what was being shown to Isaiah by the following comment, but this could become relevant?



The best guess that I can make as to why the truth about the ADDITION OF H2O to Antarctica may have been HIDDEN, could be that the eight thousand five hundred wealthiest people on earth, as they are advised by their one million to twenty million most highly reimbursed elected officials that they have bought and paid for, plus Hollywood A-list actors, plus C.E.O.'s of large corporations, plus the leaders behind the scenes in all the major wealthy religions of this earth......
DO NOT WANT FOR JEWS AND MUSLIMS AND CHRISTIANS AND ALL EIGHT BILLION OF US TO COOPERATE ON DELIBERATELY TURNING DESERTS GREEN!

The wealthiest of the wealthy know that only by DIVIDING US can Neo - Malthusian Economic Theory and philosophy be implemented by the true leaders of all of this earth.
Hi wow
You just hit a good point,
it's tactical alinsky for divisional purpose.

First
we'll get the people to kill themselves
in the streets over the weather...
Then... ahh. ahhh..

Shouldn't be that hard in Minnesota,
we'll start there.
 
The massive amount of H2O that has cracked and slid off the LAND BASED Greenland Ice Sheet over the past thirty years as icebergs, plus the amount of H2O that has melted off the world glaciers is essentially the exact same amount of H2O that has been ADDED AS ICE TO THE MASSIVE ANTARCTIC ICE SHEETS?!



Humans are doing two things that are pushing ocean levels higher, not much higher, but in that direction.


1. burning fossil fuels produces CO2 and H2O, and that H2O ends up in the oceans.
2. "tonnage displacement of water" meaning cruise ships, aircraft carriers, oil rigs, artificial reefs and islands, dock and piers etc.

AA has grown ice for 40 million consecutive years, and will continue to do that until

1. it moves off South Pole

or

2. it reaches an equilibrium where ice added = ice lost to icebergs, and after 40 million years it still has not reached that point




You say the ice is "sliding off" Greenland. Not exactly. Where the icebergs calve is on the west coast. There is zero evidence Greenland is losing ice. It adds a new ice layer every year. It has not retreated. It has reached its "melting point" about 200 miles south of Arctic Circle, about the same latitude where North American Ice Age melted adjusted for tectonic plate movement.


This is the sea level map of Greenland.... "sliding off" incorrect, ALREADY BELOW SEA LEVEL BEING PUSHED OUT is



New Greenland maps show more glaciers at risk – NASA Sea Level Change ...

R.2f3b773c98f9bb3bbd6da087e7b44713




Greenland Sea Map




This is where North American Ice Age melted per latitude..



R.12b2dd77d50da573593b3262da940b65




North America moves SW about an inch a year. This map is old because it is wrong about Greenland being frozen, and it has the "Glacial Maximum" which was originally dated to 50 million years ago. The latitude of the melt line moved north as North America moved south, and during that time Greenland was moving NW...


Greenland moved NW and it froze

North America moved SW and it melted


hmmmmm.....
 
Humans are doing two things that are pushing ocean levels higher, not much higher, but in that direction.


1. burning fossil fuels produces CO2 and H2O, and that H2O ends up in the oceans.
2. "tonnage displacement of water" meaning cruise ships, aircraft carriers, oil rigs, artificial reefs and islands, dock and piers etc.

AA has grown ice for 40 million consecutive years, and will continue to do that until

1. it moves off South Pole

or

2. it reaches an equilibrium where ice added = ice lost to icebergs, and after 40 million years it still has not reached that point




You say the ice is "sliding off" Greenland. Not exactly. Where the icebergs calve is on the west coast. There is zero evidence Greenland is losing ice. It adds a new ice layer every year. It has not retreated. It has reached its "melting point" about 200 miles south of Arctic Circle, about the same latitude where North American Ice Age melted adjusted for tectonic plate movement.


This is the sea level map of Greenland.... "sliding off" incorrect, ALREADY BELOW SEA LEVEL BEING PUSHED OUT is



New Greenland maps show more glaciers at risk – NASA Sea Level Change ...

R.2f3b773c98f9bb3bbd6da087e7b44713




Greenland Sea Map




This is where North American Ice Age melted per latitude..



R.12b2dd77d50da573593b3262da940b65




North America moves SW about an inch a year. This map is old because it is wrong about Greenland being frozen, and it has the "Glacial Maximum" which was originally dated to 50 million years ago. The latitude of the melt line moved north as North America moved south, and during that time Greenland was moving NW...


Greenland moved NW and it froze

North America moved SW and it melted


hmmmmm.....
Most people don't know that icebergs are fresh water.


also floating icebergs don't add any "rise"
as they melt, as to equal displacement via volume.
However
I just found this
nasa disagrees with me on this point, so i'll try it for my self right here on the Trump Gulf of America.
I'll post the resilts
Now
I'm afraid of a Democrat war on icebergs.

Melting Ocean Ice Affects Sea Level – Unlike Ice Cubes in a Glass – NASA Sea Level Change Portal Melting Ocean Ice Affects Sea Level – Unlike Ice Cubes in a Glass
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom