Maine’s passage of ‘right to food’ amendment stirs celebration, worry

[WinterBorn]

It sounds more like "hate on the Poor". The Law must be this Majestic:

“The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread.”

― Anatole France

Oh, so helping the poor by actually going out and DOING things is hate. But sitting at home and scheming is loving the poor?

 

[struth]

Because they have to demonstrate Contempt of the People first. I have already asked for a summary judgment.

hhahaha

Now, we know you are lying.

You can go right to Federal Court

 

[struth]

It sounds more like "hate on the Poor". The Law must be this Majestic:

“The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread.”

― Anatole France

France, was an outspoken socialist, and supporter of the Russian Revolution that did nothing but bring people to poverty and left them begging in the streets

He was wrong on his views as well

 

[hadit]

General taxation is always to be preferred when raising money for the general welfare.

Then you're not going to get the 2.0 multiplier. You'll get the same as other welfare programs, .8. Why don't you see that?

 

[Papageorgio]

What if you have to report income from any source?

I will be unemployed, equal protection, remember?

 

[WinterBorn]

I will be unemployed, equal protection, remember?

And Daniel forbids there being any means testing, so your retirement money will not be taken into account. Isn't that handy?

 

[hadit]

And Daniel forbids there being any means testing, so your retirement money will not be taken into account. Isn't that handy?

He also doesn't specify who it would be limited to. Of course he jumped right into means testing when I asked him whether children would be covered and he never indicated when people would "retire" from getting paid to not work. Basically, he hasn't thought any of this through.

 

[danielpalos]

I will pay taxes on the extra $31,200 I get annually.

And it is not my story, it is yours. You are the one who has been claiming the 2.0 multiplier means the $2.5 billion would not cost anything.

What if resorting to uc funds puts you in a higher tax bracket automatically if it is not your only source of income?

 

[danielpalos]

Oh, so helping the poor by actually going out and DOING things is hate. But sitting at home and scheming is loving the poor?

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

 

[danielpalos]

hhahaha

Now, we know you are lying.

You can go right to Federal Court

Thanks. The Court has thirty days to respond.

 

[danielpalos]

France, was an outspoken socialist, and supporter of the Russian Revolution that did nothing but bring people to poverty and left them begging in the streets

He was wrong on his views as well

Our understanding of economics was much worse then.

 

[danielpalos]

Then you're not going to get the 2.0 multiplier. You'll get the same as other welfare programs, .8. Why don't you see that?

Because I am not a storyteller appealing to ignorance.

 

[danielpalos]

I will be unemployed, equal protection, remember?

No difference from what we have now, in that specific regard.

 

[danielpalos]

And Daniel forbids there being any means testing, so your retirement money will not be taken into account. Isn't that handy?

That is just You storyteller. You still have to report income from Any source.

 

[danielpalos]

He also doesn't specify who it would be limited to. Of course he jumped right into means testing when I asked him whether children would be covered and he never indicated when people would "retire" from getting paid to not work. Basically, he hasn't thought any of this through.

Unemployed in an at-will employment State could be enough for unemployment compensation.

 

[Papageorgio]

No difference from what we have now, in that specific regard.

So any other funds I may get outside of employment would then be irrelevant. We are talking unemployment funds that my wife and I would get. All things being equal, what I make of investments or other non-employment can’t be taken into account, according to your scenario.

 

[Papageorgio]

That is just You storyteller. You still have to report income from Any source.

But you said no means testing, are you now changing? It seems that unemployment for the unemployed was your goal, did that change?

 

[WinterBorn]

What if resorting to uc funds puts you in a higher tax bracket automatically if it is not your only source of income?

I'll pay higher taxes. No biggie. I'll still be making more money.

 

[WinterBorn]

That is just You storyteller. You still have to report income from Any source.

So there is means testing?

 

[danielpalos]

So any other funds I may get outside of employment would then be irrelevant. We are talking unemployment funds that my wife and I would get. All things being equal, what I make of investments or other non-employment can’t be taken into account, according to your scenario.

You need to report income from Any source. It is my opinion that anyone with an income who applies for unemployment compensation for "greed" instead of need, should be taxed at a higher rate.