Mail in voting - Democrats again the party of despotism

colfax_m

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2019
Messages
14,892
Reaction score
3,857
Points
150
If voting in person is too much of an ordeal then you are unqualified to vote so dont
Really? Says who? Are people with covid unqualified? What about people who do not have vehicles, or their polling places have been shut down? What about disabled folks who can't leave the house? How are they unqualified? If you are unable to answer, then you are nothing but a liar.
Once again shit for brains. 5% of the population has always voted by mail which is not the same as all or mostly all of the voters
And who says so is anyone with an ounce of gumption snd motivation
Typical liberal hoax trying to present the exception as the rule
FYI
23% voted by mail in the last 2018 midterm election...

-------

As many as 64 percent of Americans are expected to vote by mail this year, according to a group of researchers at Harvard, Northeastern, and Rutgers universities, as well as the Harvard Medical School. That’s a huge increase over the 23 percent who voted by mail in 2018, according to census data.

We walked on the moon....

We split the atom....

We can certainly have a safe and accurate election during a pandemic, where the majority vote by mail....

All we need is Leadership....to get it done!

(Instead we have a whining, wimpy, do nothing, trouble making, naysayer!)

We can do this, but we better stop arguing, and get busy making it safe and accurate!
cut the pompom shit.

we have no need to do this other than you think you can cheat your fucking asses off to do it. if you gave a FUCK about safe and accurate voting you'd be for voter ID's and registration.
Your conspiratorial brain, needs a rest.

The only actual lifelong cheater in the lot, is Donald J Trump.....

The president is who is once again, trying to cheat and cause havoc and chaos with his easily brainwashed minions.

President Trump with his swamp creature Mega Donor that he put in charge of the US Postal Service, is sabotaging the postal service....with cuts and delays and mayhem....

He does not want absentee votes counted, except in Republican states like Florida....
Why are you so easily fooled?

Google it and inform yourself for a change, nitwit.
sabotaging the postal service....with cuts and delays and mayhem....

Cuts? Why would the fantastic, hugely profitable postal service ever need any cuts???
Who said the post office is supposed to run a profit?
 

Toddsterpatriot

Diamond Member
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
61,049
Reaction score
10,378
Points
2,030
Location
Chicago
If voting in person is too much of an ordeal then you are unqualified to vote so dont
Really? Says who? Are people with covid unqualified? What about people who do not have vehicles, or their polling places have been shut down? What about disabled folks who can't leave the house? How are they unqualified? If you are unable to answer, then you are nothing but a liar.
Once again shit for brains. 5% of the population has always voted by mail which is not the same as all or mostly all of the voters
And who says so is anyone with an ounce of gumption snd motivation
Typical liberal hoax trying to present the exception as the rule
FYI
23% voted by mail in the last 2018 midterm election...

-------

As many as 64 percent of Americans are expected to vote by mail this year, according to a group of researchers at Harvard, Northeastern, and Rutgers universities, as well as the Harvard Medical School. That’s a huge increase over the 23 percent who voted by mail in 2018, according to census data.

We walked on the moon....

We split the atom....

We can certainly have a safe and accurate election during a pandemic, where the majority vote by mail....

All we need is Leadership....to get it done!

(Instead we have a whining, wimpy, do nothing, trouble making, naysayer!)

We can do this, but we better stop arguing, and get busy making it safe and accurate!
cut the pompom shit.

we have no need to do this other than you think you can cheat your fucking asses off to do it. if you gave a FUCK about safe and accurate voting you'd be for voter ID's and registration.
Your conspiratorial brain, needs a rest.

The only actual lifelong cheater in the lot, is Donald J Trump.....

The president is who is once again, trying to cheat and cause havoc and chaos with his easily brainwashed minions.

President Trump with his swamp creature Mega Donor that he put in charge of the US Postal Service, is sabotaging the postal service....with cuts and delays and mayhem....

He does not want absentee votes counted, except in Republican states like Florida....
Why are you so easily fooled?

Google it and inform yourself for a change, nitwit.
sabotaging the postal service....with cuts and delays and mayhem....

Cuts? Why would the fantastic, hugely profitable postal service ever need any cuts???
Who said the post office is supposed to run a profit?
Not me.
 

BWK

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2018
Messages
13,816
Reaction score
2,334
Points
255
This thread is not about whether or not government mailing ballots all over the place without being prompted is a good idea or not. I think it's not, but that's for another thread.

The parties of course are competing with each other. And realistically, there are only two parties that win any substantial number of elections. Fair play in all competitions is that rules are agreed on before the competition by the contestants.

That Democrats are ramming a new system down everyone's throats is in itself wrong and despotic. The parties should agree to changing the system of deciding who wins those competitions before the competition. One party should not be able to unilaterally change the rules themselves on their own.

Democrats keep saying we're a "democracy." Well, when one side is deciding how we determine the winner, it's not. Democrats are more and more like any despotic government that decides how elections will be run and who will win.

If mail in ballots are better, then we need to take the time and figure out how to make it work so both sides are comfortable.

So the question to address in the thread: Should one party be able to unilaterally be able to change the basic rules of the game over the objections of the other party?

I say no. Republicans should not be able to do it either
Your naked emperor is schizophrenic:

He's fucking nuts. He's lost it.
 

BWK

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2018
Messages
13,816
Reaction score
2,334
Points
255
We know the virus hoax is designed to harm Trump and punish productive freedom seeking Americans. The Great Mail In Hoax now seems to be the mechanism.
Prove the virus is a hoax liar.
 

busybee01

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2017
Messages
17,057
Reaction score
2,615
Points
290
Have you clowns figured out why the Democrats picked the specific - very late - date they did for the 1st debate?

The 1st debate is scheduled for AFTER mail-in voting starts. So Biden can stumble, stutter, forget where he is, declare he hates all blacks and honestly declare Dems only pretend to like Latinos for their votes, and the ballots already cast can't be changed.

:p
Trump can talk about suburban housewives, the head coach of Alabama Lou Saban and honestly say he hates everyone except white males. There is absolutely no reason why people should not be able to vote before the first debate if they have made up their mind. No debate has changed the outcome since the 60s and maybe the 70s.
No debate has changed the outcome since the 60s and maybe the 70s.

Tell that to Dem nominee Michael Bloomberg.
Thedebates did not hurt Bloomberg. It was his inability to win the black vote. When he went to a black church, the parishioners made their views known.

The debates did not hurt Bloomberg.

Hilarious!!!

He was in second place before and irrelevent after the first debate.
Dropped out 2 weeks later.
Despite spending nearly a billion dollars.

View attachment 372975



Feb. 20, 2020 at 12:19 p.m. CST

It took only minutes for the pummeling of former New York mayor Mike Bloomberg to commence at Wednesday’s Democratic presidential debate. “I’d like to talk about who we’re running against, a billionaire who calls women ‘fat broads’ and ‘horse-faced lesbians,’” Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) declared. “And, no, I’m not talking about Donald Trump. I’m talking about Mayor Bloomberg.”


You really believe that. Black voters in SC voted for Biden over Bloomberg. The debate had nothing to do with it.
Black voters in SC voted for Biden over Bloomberg.

By what margin?

The debate had nothing to do with it.

No kidding.
The black vote was 56% of the total in SC and 61% voted for Biden compared to 17 for Sanders. Bloomberg had major issues among black voters. When he attended a black church to speak the congregation turned their backs on him. That had nothing to do with the debate. Also Sanders winning in NH and Nevada united white voters behind Biden.
Hey Busy, haven't you heard the latest?

'BLACK LIVES MAGA! :p




.
You really are dreaming aren't you? Another crazy poll.
 

Toddsterpatriot

Diamond Member
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
61,049
Reaction score
10,378
Points
2,030
Location
Chicago
Have you clowns figured out why the Democrats picked the specific - very late - date they did for the 1st debate?

The 1st debate is scheduled for AFTER mail-in voting starts. So Biden can stumble, stutter, forget where he is, declare he hates all blacks and honestly declare Dems only pretend to like Latinos for their votes, and the ballots already cast can't be changed.

:p
Trump can talk about suburban housewives, the head coach of Alabama Lou Saban and honestly say he hates everyone except white males. There is absolutely no reason why people should not be able to vote before the first debate if they have made up their mind. No debate has changed the outcome since the 60s and maybe the 70s.
No debate has changed the outcome since the 60s and maybe the 70s.

Tell that to Dem nominee Michael Bloomberg.
Thedebates did not hurt Bloomberg. It was his inability to win the black vote. When he went to a black church, the parishioners made their views known.

The debates did not hurt Bloomberg.

Hilarious!!!

He was in second place before and irrelevent after the first debate.
Dropped out 2 weeks later.
Despite spending nearly a billion dollars.

View attachment 372975



Feb. 20, 2020 at 12:19 p.m. CST

It took only minutes for the pummeling of former New York mayor Mike Bloomberg to commence at Wednesday’s Democratic presidential debate. “I’d like to talk about who we’re running against, a billionaire who calls women ‘fat broads’ and ‘horse-faced lesbians,’” Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) declared. “And, no, I’m not talking about Donald Trump. I’m talking about Mayor Bloomberg.”


You really believe that. Black voters in SC voted for Biden over Bloomberg. The debate had nothing to do with it.
Black voters in SC voted for Biden over Bloomberg.

By what margin?

The debate had nothing to do with it.

No kidding.
The black vote was 56% of the total in SC and 61% voted for Biden compared to 17 for Sanders. Bloomberg had major issues among black voters. When he attended a black church to speak the congregation turned their backs on him. That had nothing to do with the debate. Also Sanders winning in NH and Nevada united white voters behind Biden.
Hey Busy, haven't you heard the latest?

'BLACK LIVES MAGA! :p




.
You really are dreaming aren't you? Another crazy poll.
You never said how many more votes Biden got compared to Bloomberg in SC........you ok?
 

Turtlesoup

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2020
Messages
1,032
Reaction score
1,063
Points
1,893
This thread is not about whether or not government mailing ballots all over the place without being prompted is a good idea or not. I think it's not, but that's for another thread.

The parties of course are competing with each other. And realistically, there are only two parties that win any substantial number of elections. Fair play in all competitions is that rules are agreed on before the competition by the contestants.

That Democrats are ramming a new system down everyone's throats is in itself wrong and despotic. The parties should agree to changing the system of deciding who wins those competitions before the competition. One party should not be able to unilaterally change the rules themselves on their own.

Democrats keep saying we're a "democracy." Well, when one side is deciding how we determine the winner, it's not. Democrats are more and more like any despotic government that decides how elections will be run and who will win.

If mail in ballots are better, then we need to take the time and figure out how to make it work so both sides are comfortable.

So the question to address in the thread: Should one party be able to unilaterally be able to change the basic rules of the game over the objections of the other party?

I say no. Republicans should not be able to do it either
Actually neither party should be able to make big changes...their power was initially limited for a reason......which is politicians have throughout time been universally corrupt.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: kaz

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top